Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia: Suatu Eksperimen yang Tidak Kunjung Selesai Rosadi, Otong
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (614.931 KB)

AbstrakPada Pasal 18 UUD 1945 diamanatkan agar pemerintah menjalankan otonomi seluas-luasnya dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Meski demikian, sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1945, UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1948, dan beberapa perundang-undangan lain hingga UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 dan kini UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014, menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk menganut sistem rumah tangga otonomi yang berbeda-beda. Pada sisi lain, dalam Pasal 18 UUD 1945 tidak secara tegas diatur mengenai pemegang titik berat otonomi. Politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang berlaku menyisakan pertanyaan penting apakah Pasal 18 UUD 1945 (sebelum perubahan) dan Pasal 18, Pasal 18A dan Pasal 18B UUD 1945 (pasca perubahan) merupakan politik hukum yang tetap, yang dapat dijadikan dasar konstitusionalitas bagi politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apabila demikian, akan timbul pertanyaan baru terkait penyusunan (politik) perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apakah hal tersebut merupakan kebijakan hukum yang terbuka (open legal policy) sehingga pemerintah dan DPR bisa semaunya memberikan tafsir dan mengisi maksud Pasal 18 sesuai dengan politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang dikehendakinya atau bukan? Perbedaan materi muatan dalam setiap peraturan perundang-undangan dan penempatan titik berat pada level (satuan) pemerintahan yang berbeda-beda membuktikan bahwa pola pengaturan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia merupakan suatu eksperimen yang tidak pernah selesai.Constitutionality of Local Government Regulations in Indonesia: A Never Ending ExperimentAbstractArticle 18 of the 1945 Constitution instructs the implementation of widest possible autonomy in the performance of Regional Government. However, since the implementation of Law Number 1 of 1945, Law Number 22 of 1948, and other legislations up to Law Number 32 of 2004 and even Law Number 23 of 2014, there has been a tendency of adopting differing systems (bylaws) of autonomy between the laws. Meanwhile, Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution does not strictly assign a particular governmental level or unit as the emphasis for the implementation of autonomy. Such legal politics invites a major question to be addressed, namely whether the legislations, including Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution (pre-amandment), as well as Article 18, 18A, and 18D of the 1945 Constitution (post-amandment) are not fixed legal politics to serve as the constitutionally for the legislations on regional government? And if so, is the legislation on regional government an open legal policy that allows the Peoples Consultative Assembly (DPR) and the government to freely interpret the content of Article 18A as they wish? The differing emphasis on the governmental level and unit for autonomy demonstrates that the matter of regional government somehow is a never-ending experimentation. This article utilizes normative and historical approaches in conductiong content analysis on regional goverment legislations.Â DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a7

Ide Bernegara dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: Rekonstruksi Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pascaamandemen Rosadi, Otong
Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, JANUARI 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This article tries to answer the question of whether the idea of the state underlying the amendment of the 1945 Constitution? Then how to put this need in the context of (re) construction of statehood in the future. This writing is a description of the analysis with the normative approach of philosophical and juridical. The conclusion of this article states that the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, which was originally expected to improve the state administration system and state life, has actually reduced the ideas of the state that had originally been arranged systematically and directed by the founders of the state. The fifth amendment of the 1945 Constitution should be placed as the great effort of the Indonesian nation to restore the 1945 Constitution to its authenticity, as the document of the establishment of the State, the milestone of the nation's achievement / goal, the ideals and goals of the state, as well as the philosophy, values, a fundamental constitution.

HUKUM KODRAT, PANCASILA DAN ASAS HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Otong Rosadi
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 10, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.98

Goal of legislation establishment is fair legislation carries out mission of prosperous society. To achieve the goal, process of the establishment has to be based on moral nation as philosophical foundation. For Indonesian people, Pancasila on Preamble of UUD 1945, not only as national goal but also as fundamental basic rule of state, should be the basis of legislation establishment.Keywords: legislation establishment, Pancasila, moral nation, legal principle

Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia: Suatu Eksperimen yang Tidak Kunjung Selesai Otong Rosadi
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (614.931 KB)

AbstrakPada Pasal 18 UUD 1945 diamanatkan agar pemerintah menjalankan otonomi seluas-luasnya dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Meski demikian, sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1945, UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1948, dan beberapa perundang-undangan lain hingga UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 dan kini UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014, menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk menganut sistem rumah tangga otonomi yang berbeda-beda. Pada sisi lain, dalam Pasal 18 UUD 1945 tidak secara tegas diatur mengenai pemegang titik berat otonomi. Politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang berlaku menyisakan pertanyaan penting apakah Pasal 18 UUD 1945 (sebelum perubahan) dan Pasal 18, Pasal 18A dan Pasal 18B UUD 1945 (pasca perubahan) merupakan politik hukum yang tetap, yang dapat dijadikan dasar konstitusionalitas bagi politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apabila demikian, akan timbul pertanyaan baru terkait penyusunan (politik) perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apakah hal tersebut merupakan kebijakan hukum yang terbuka (open legal policy) sehingga pemerintah dan DPR bisa semaunya memberikan tafsir dan mengisi maksud Pasal 18 sesuai dengan politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang dikehendakinya atau bukan? Perbedaan materi muatan dalam setiap peraturan perundang-undangan dan penempatan titik berat pada level (satuan) pemerintahan yang berbeda-beda membuktikan bahwa pola pengaturan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia merupakan suatu eksperimen yang tidak pernah selesai.Constitutionality of Local Government Regulations in Indonesia: A Never Ending ExperimentAbstractArticle 18 of the 1945 Constitution instructs the implementation of widest possible autonomy in the performance of Regional Government. However, since the implementation of Law Number 1 of 1945, Law Number 22 of 1948, and other legislations up to Law Number 32 of 2004 and even Law Number 23 of 2014, there has been a tendency of adopting differing systems (bylaws) of autonomy between the laws. Meanwhile, Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution does not strictly assign a particular governmental level or unit as the emphasis for the implementation of autonomy. Such legal politics invites a major question to be addressed, namely whether the legislations, including Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution (pre-amandment), as well as Article 18, 18A, and 18D of the 1945 Constitution (post-amandment) are not fixed legal politics to serve as the constitutionally for the legislations on regional government? And if so, is the legislation on regional government an open legal policy that allows the People's Consultative Assembly (DPR) and the government to freely interpret the content of Article 18A as they wish? The differing emphasis on the governmental level and unit for autonomy demonstrates that the matter of regional government somehow is a never-ending experimentation. This article utilizes normative and historical approaches in conductiong content analysis on regional goverment legislations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a7

KEWENANGAN CAMAT DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN PEMERINTAH NAGARI DI KECAMATAN SULIKI KABUPATEN LIMA PULUH KOTA Ricky Edwar; Otong Rosadi
UNES Law Review Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i1.203

Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government mandates the District Government to provide guidance and empowerment to the Village / Nagari Government through the Regional Apparatus / Camat organization. Article 226 paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government states that in addition to carrying out the tasks referred to in article 25 paragraph (1) the Camat receives the delegation of part of the Regent / Mayor's authority to carry out part of the government affairs which fall under the authority of the Regency / City. Based on the background of the above thought, the problems discussed are, first, how is the implementation of the Camat's authority in empowering the Nagari government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency? and second, what are the obstacles faced in empowering Nagari government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota district? This research is a descriptive analytical study, with the normative juridical approach as the main approach and the empirical juridical as the support for the main approach. The data collected are secondary data and primary data. Data collection techniques with field studies through interviews for primary data and literature study for secondary data. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and presented in descriptive analytical form, which only described how the Camat's authority was exercised, the obstacles faced and the efforts made to overcome obstacles in the implementation of the Camat's authority in empowering the Nagari Government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, Government Regulation Number 17 of 2018 concerning Districts and Regulation of the Regent of Fifty Cities Number 72 of 2016 concerning the Position of the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions and Administration of the sub-districts has arranged in detail the duties and authorities of the Camat in empowering the Nagari government. However, the fact is that the guidance, empowerment and supervision of the nagari are mostly carried out by sectoral institutions / agencies. This, of course, will indirectly result in a reduction in the authority of the Camat in carrying out activities, especially those concerning Nagari governance. As a result, the control range is too far causing ineffective and inefficient implementation of tasks in the sub-district as well as in the nagari. The obstacles faced by the sub-district head in the process of empowering the village government are the limited and unclear authority which results in unallocated budgets to empower the village government and the lack of coordination between the District Government and the Nagari Government. The effort made by the sub-district head is to continue carrying out his duties in accordance with the Regulation of the Regent of Fifty Cities Number 72 of 2016 concerning 2016 concerning the Position of the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions and Work Procedures of the sub-districts

PENYUSUNAN PRODUK HUKUM SEBAGAI KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAHAN NAGARI DI KECAMATAN BAYANG KABUPATEN PESISIR SELATAN Sahnan Sahuri Siregar; Otong Rosadi; Darmini Roza
BULETIN ILMIAH NAGARI MEMBANGUN Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : LPPM (Institute for Research and Community Services) Universitas Andalas Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/bina.v3i2.203

This community service activity was carried out on Wednesday, August 21, 2019 with the first aim, to find out and analyse the background knowledge and experience of the nagari device to influence knowledge and abilities (expertise) in the preparation of Nagari Legal Products. Second, to find out and analyse how to increase the capacity of knowledge and abilities (expertise) of the Nagari Tool kit in preparing Nagari Legal Products? Third, to find out and analyse the right strategy to increase the capacity of the nagari government apparatus and members of Bamus Nagari so that they are able to draft a Nagari Regulation that is based on the needs of the nagari community. Community service activities in the form of training are carried out using lecture, question-answer, deepening and training methods. The lecture method is used as a preliminary briefing on several theories, concepts, and laws and regulations relating to nagari legal products, as well as to increase the motivation of nagari devices in the preparation of nagari legal products. While the question-and-answer method provides an opportunity for participants to discuss obstacles that arise during their practice and experience in arranging nagari legal products. The training method is used to practice the formulation of nagari regulations. Based on the activities that have been carried out, it can be concluded that almost all the training participants were very enthusiastic in participating in the training that was held with an indication that the active participants were discussing, the nagari as participants were present from the beginning of the opening until the end of the opening. After the training ended, he was able to understand and practice well all the material delivered during the service activities. The obstacle that arises is the limited space in the Bayang Sub district area, so that the place is done in the Nagari Office Hall which is too large and not soundproof so that the implementation of activities must use a loudspeaker.

KOORDINASI ANTARA PENYIDIK POLRES PADANG PARIAMAN DENGAN BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL/ AGRARIA TATA RUANG KABUPATEN PADANG PARIAMAN DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA LARANGAN PEMAKAIAN TANAH TANPA IZIN Otong Rosadi; Hendra Hendra
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i4.283

Article 2 of Law Number 51 Prp of 1960 concerning Prohibition of Land Use Without Permission from the Entitled Person or his legal proxy. This research is a legal research with a descriptive analytical specification. The implementation of coordination between the Padang Pariaman Police Criminal Investigation Unit and the Padang Pariaman BPN/ATR in the investigation of the prohibition of land use without a permit or legal proxy is in terms of proving the status of ownership of the land. The National Land Agency was asked for information regarding land grabbing because the authorities and understanding of land grabbing are related to the legality of ownership of the land, even though the reporting party has shown proof of ownership but still requires information from the National Land Agency. Coordination is also carried out in terms of testing the validity of the documentary evidence collected by investigators in land grabbing cases. Obstacles in Coordination Between the Padang Pariaman Police Criminal Investigation Unit and Padang Pariaman BPN/ATR in Criminal Investigations for Prohibition of Land Use Without a Permit or Legal Proxy, among which are often difficult to distinguish the authenticity of proof of land ownership and the existence of overlapping land ownership which this cannot be proven by BPN as the institution that issued the evidence on the pretext of differences in leadership policies at that time. There are different agencies issuing proof of ownership of the same plot of land to different parties. The existence of falsification of land documents so that the Land Agency takes a long time to test the authenticity of these documents and makes the investigation take a long time.

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PERATURAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP TERSANGKA TINDAK PIDANA Otong Rosadi; Aswad Satria
UNES Law Review Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i1.294

The Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice is the legal basis used by the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office in resolving minor crimes through restorative. Based on this regulation, the Pariaman District Prosecutor's Office for the last 2 (two) years from 2020 to June 2022 succeeded in resolving criminal acts that occurred with the concept of Restorative Justice as part of law enforcement. two) cases, 2 (two) cases of torture. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as the main data and primary data as supporting data, which were collected through library research and field studies with interview techniques. All data were then compiled and analyzed qualitatively, and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Results Based on the research it can be explained that: First, the Juridical Implications of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice Against Criminal Suspects, the Pariaman District Prosecutor's Office succeeded in committing 4 (four) criminal acts throughout 2020 until June 2022 with the Restorative Justice Method. However, only 2 (two) criminal acts ended peacefully and did not proceed to the District Court. Second, the obstacles faced by the Prosecutor's Office in implementing the Regulation of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice against suspects of criminal acts consist of legal and non-legal obstacles. The legal obstacle is that the position of the prosecutor's regulation itself is not strong enough because the process of delaying the regulation is only regulated by a Ministerial-level regulation. Non-legal constraints have 2 (two) parts, namely Internal and External Constraints

PENERAPAN PERATURAN MENTERI ATR/BPN NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2020 DALAM KEGIATAN PELAYANAN HAK TANGGUNGAN TERINTEGRASI SECARA ELEKTRONIK PADA KANTOR PERTANAHAN (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan) Muhammad Reza; Otong Rosadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.513

Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN Number 5 of 2020 concerning Electronically Integrated KPR Services has changed conventional mortgage services to an electronic system. With the enactment of Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN Number 5 of 2020, every land office in Indonesia has provided pawning services electronically. The Pesisir Selatan District Land Office has implemented electronically integrated KPR services. The specification of this research is descriptive analysis. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach as the main approach which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. Based on the results of the research, discussion, and analysis it can be concluded as follows: First, the application of Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN Number 5 of 2020 in Electronically Integrated Pawning Activities at the Land Office of Pesisir Selatan Regency is that when registering Mortgage Rights manually the PPAT must come in person to the BPN office representing the bank takes care of everything up to the issuance of the Mortgage certificate, now the PPAT's task is only to submit APHT through the electronic system. The second obstacle encountered in the Implementation of Permen ATR/BPN Number 5 of 2020 in Electronically Integrated Pawn Service Activities at the Pesisir Selatan District Land Office is more likely to be technical problems related to electronic systems, such as server interruptions and power outages.

IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA KAWASAN KETERLANJURAN Syamsul Bahary; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Otong Rosadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.553

Implementasi Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Penegakan Hukum Bidang Kehutanan Sesuai Dengan Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Oleh Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Sumatera Barat adalah dengan pengenaan Sanksi Administratif sebelum dikenai sanksi pidana terhadap pelanggaran yang bersifat administratif dan tidak menimbulkan dampak kesehatan, keselamatan, dan/atau lingkungan (K2L). Hal ini terutama dilakukan terhadap areal tumpang tindih atau areal keterlanjuran, sehingga sejarah lahan atau kawasan harus menjadi acuan dalam penyelesaiannya. Bagi Pekebun sawit yang kebunnya berada di kawasan hutan sebelum UUCK terbit dan memiliki izin seperti Izin Lokasi, IUP, dan STD-B, maka kepada Pekebun tersebut akan diberikan kesempatan selama 3 (tiga) tahun sejak UUCK terbit untuk memenuhi persyaratan yang ditentukan. Terhadap kebun yang ada di Kawasan hutan produksi akan diterbitkan Persetujuan Pelepasan Kawasan hutan. Jika terdapat tumpang tindih kebun sawit dengan Perizinan Pemanfaatan Hutan, maka akan diteliti mana yang lebih dahulu terbit. Kendala Dalam Implementasi Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Penegakan Hukum Bidang Kehutanan Sesuai Dengan Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Oleh Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Sumatera Barat adalah kenyataan bahwa pelaku perkebunan merupakan korporasi adalah orang-orang yang mempunyai modal/capital yang sangat besar. Keengganan mereka mengurus izin dikarenakan sanksi pidana berupa denda bukanlah masalah besar bagi mereka. Rawannya petani dikriminalisasi karena lahannya diklaim masuk kawasan hutan. Koordinasi yang lemah antara Kepolisian dan dinas Kehutanan karena Kepolisin memiliki pemahaman terbatas dengan berbagai ketentuan perizinan bagi Kawasan keterlanjuran dalam hutan.

Title

Found 11 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 11 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 11 Documents
Search