Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Verstek
Zakki Adlhiyati
UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
DISPARITY ON CUMMULATION CASES OF TORT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT Zakki Adlhiyati; itok dwi kurniawan; muhammad rustamaji; Ismawati septiningsih
Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Vol 3 No 1: Juni 2022
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47492/jip.v3i1.1589

Abstract

The discussion on the differentiation between breach of contract and tort has been prevail in a long time. In addition, there is judge’s disparity on the breach of contract and tort cumulation cases. Three cumulation dicisions were anallysed to understand the legal reasoning of the judges. Legal as well as conceptual approach used to reveal the strong relationship between breach of contract and tort in actual cases. Despite the different nature of the cases, the principle of tort existed on the breach of contract. However, the disparities of the awards occured on the actual cases. Firstly, judge consider that the cumulation is formally invalid hence the claim is unacceptable. Finally, on others cases the former reason is put aside and the judges acknowledge the strong relation between breach of contract and tort. Furthermore, systematical legal reasoning is used to grant the claims. With regard to the fairness, judge as the law enforcer need to give reasonable decision with their intellectuality.
ASPEK KEPERDATAAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PADA PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM ERA PERKEMBANGAN TEKNOLOGI DAN INFORMASI GUNA REFORMULASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM Arsyad Aldyan; Muhammad Rustamaji; Ismawati Septiningsih; Zakki Adlhiyati; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol 11 No 2 (2022): JURNAL GLOBAL CITIZEN JURNAL ILMIAH KAJIAN PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (126.567 KB) | DOI: 10.33061/jgz.v11i2.6743

Abstract

This article discusses the civilian aspect in defamation cases which is intended to reform law enforcement against defamation cases. This article uses normative research methods and uses a legislative approach. Defamation is indeed an act that violates the law and certainly harms the person whose reputation is tarnished, but with this loss, it is seen that it is possible to resolve this issue can be resolved through a civil law approach with aspects of illegal acts. This is because the application of criminal sanctions is the ultimate medium, and also of course the essence is to look at the resolution of the problem. Reformulation of law enforcement policy in defamation cases leading to civil settlement is of course intended so that the aggrieved person also receives compensation from the perpetrator, and also the perpetrator is obliged to pay compensation, so as not to release the perpetrator of defamation for the act committed, but not in the presence of criminal sanctions law enforcement.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum bagi Keterangan Ahli dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Perdata Akbar Syafaat Faadhillah; Zakki Adlhiyati
Verstek Vol 10, No 2: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i2.67701

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah seorang ahli dapat dituntut dan dikriminalisasi serta bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap seorang ahli tersebut atas keterangan yang diberikannya di persidangan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa seorang ahli tidak dapat dituntut dan dikriminalisasi atas keterangan yang diberikannya dipersidangan, karena apabila keterangan ahli dipakai oleh hakim maka sama saja hakim percaya dan berpegang teguh kepada keyakinan tersebut, dan apabila dapat dituntut sama saja itu menuntut keyakinan hakim.  Ahli juga tidak dapat dikriminalisasi karena semua keterangan yang diberikan oleh ahli merupakan semua ilmu pengetahuan yang di pelajarinya selama ini. Perlindungan terhadap ahli sendiri diatur pada Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UndangUndang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban, Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.Kata kunci: Dituntut dan Dikriminalisasi; Perlindungan Hukum; Keterangan Ahli.Abstract: This research aims to determine whether an expert is able to be prosecuted and criminalized and also how the legal protection of an expert regarding his statement given on the court.This research is a descriptively normative legal research. Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that an expert is cannot to be prosecuted and criminalized for his statement on the court, since the expert’s statement is considered as a judge’s belief. Hence, when it became prosecuted it also referred to prosecuting judge’s belief. Experts also cannot be criminalized since all statement given by experts constitutes all the knowledge they have studied so far. The protection of the experts themselves is regulated in Law Number 31 of 2014 amending the Law Number 13 of 2006 on the Witness and Victim Protection, Law Number 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management, Law Number 18 of 2013 on the Forest Eradication Prevention, and Law Number 12 of 2012 on the Higher Education.Keywords: Sued and criminalized; Legal protection; Expert statement. 
LEGAL LIABILITY ON ADMINISTRATIVE TORT: RECENT REGULATION PERSPECTIVE Muhammad Farizka Sisma; Zakki Adlhiyati
Jurnal Cendekia Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v8i2.592

Abstract

The development of judicial power brings some changes. One of them is the evolution of administrative law related to the object of administrative dispute, which embraces concrete action. Thus, the administrative tort was also affected by this change. This writing aims to understand the government's liability on the administrative tort and the regulation of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad before and after the enactment of Law Number 30/2014 on government administration. The normative juridical method reveals that the origin of authority plays a pivotal role in deciding the government's liability. Initially, the article of 1365 Civil Procedural Law was the legal based of an administrative tort, but in 2014 it was also stipulated in the Government Administration Law. In addition, The Law of Government administration broadens the limitation of administrative decisions and allows the administrative court to examine the administrative tort legally.  
KOMPARASI PENGAMPUAN (CURATELE) ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Danindra Kurnia Dafa; Zakki Adlhiyati
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76142

Abstract

This article analyzes the comparison of guardianship or curatele between Indonesia and the United States. This article aims to determine the types and differences between guardianship (curatele) in Indonesia and the United States. The research method used in this article is a normative legal research method. This research has a descriptive research nature. The collection of legal materials is done by literature study with primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that there are differences between Indonesia and the United States, the differences are in the types of guardianship that exist in both countries, namely Indonesia and America. In Indonesia, a guardian (curator) usually only has rights and duties in accordance with what has been decided or determined by the Court at the time of the appointment of a guardian, while in the United States, guardianship is divided into 3, namely, guardianship of the person, guardianship of the estate, and guardian ad litem.Keywords: Comparison, Guardianship, Indonesia and United States
Co-Authors Akbar Syafaat Faadhillah Arsyad Aldyan Danindra Kurnia Dafa Ismawati Septiningsih Ismawati septiningsih Itok Dwi Kurniawan ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Muhammad Farizka Sisma Muhammad Rustamaji muhammad rustamaji