Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

Pemilihan Umum Indonesia antara Demokrasi Pancasila dan Demokrasi Liberal Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Bali Membangun Bali: Jurnal Bappeda Litbang Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Generasi Milenial Pemilu 2019 : Membebaskan Bali dari Sampah Plastik
Publisher : Badan Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Provinsi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (596.45 KB) | DOI: 10.51172/jbmb.v2i1.34

Abstract

General election is a tools or facility in implementing democracy which is carried out directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly. This is in accordance with the principle of democracy, namely from the people, by the people, and for the people as mandated by Article 1 paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution. The election is believed to be only as one instrument to encourage the democratic process. Because the increase of mature democracy will reduce injustice and make people's lives more secure in their freedom and encourage the creation more a fair. However, democracy which is carried out through general election in Indonesia now adays is not democracy and the general which is election very suitable for Indonesia. Indonesia has a democratic style mechanism and only exists in Indonesia. Indonesian democracy has been very clearly stated in the 4th principle of Pancasila, which is popularly led by wisdom in deliberation/representation. For this reason, awareness is needed by state leaders and elected board members to be able to understand and explore the values and spirits of Indonesians style democracy. So that Indonesians democracy is getting closer to the spirit and body of Indonesias people.
Keraton Indonesia Antara Pelestarian Budaya Dan Modernitas Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 3, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (127.957 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v3i1.139

Abstract

The palace as a traditional cultural heritage of Indonesia experiences cultural tensionalong with the occurrence of modernity in Indonesia. Modernization has marginalized the role andfunction of the Palace as the center of traditional power. Conversely, efforts to build the existence ofthe Palace can be questioned about its relevance or merely cultural romance. For this reason, thisstudy examines three main problems. First, why does the Keraton preserve the Keraton Culture inIndonesia? Second, how are the forms of preservation of Keraton Culture in Indonesia? Third, whatare the implications of the Keraton Cultural Preservation in Indonesia? These three problems areexamined with three theories, namely the theory of social change, cultural adaptation, and geneticstructuralism. The research method used is qualitative research with three data collection techniques,namely observation, interviews, and document studies. Data were analyzed with descriptiveinterpretativetechniques through three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawingconclusions. The results show that the reasons underlying the preservation of the Keraton Culture in Indonesia include rebuilding the existence of the Palace, maintaining the status quo, structuraldifferentiation, and the charm of modern life. The forms of preservation of Keraton Culture include(1) passive preservation, namely the construction of the physical structure of Keratondan andmaintaining the attributes of royal identity; (2) active preservation, i.e. optimizing capital owned bythe Palace with specific patterns and specific goals in the structure of modern society; and (3)Keraton network preservation, namely strengthening collegial collective systems and networkexpansion. Implications of Keraton Cultural Preservation in social life include reformulation ofsocial relations and shifting the patron-client system. The implication in cultural life is in the form ofstrengthening Keratonsas cultural heritage and strengthening Keratonsas the center of culturaldevelopment.
Revitalisasi Maritim Dalam Pemantapan Geopolitik Indonesia Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 3, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (210.195 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v3i2.197

Abstract

History records that the archipelago is an area with more waters than land. This has been realized by the royal leaders in the archipelago. Since the days of the Srivijaya Kingdom, the Singosari Kingdom and the Majapahit Kingdom have made the sea a real force to build a kingdom. Sea or maritime is not only a support for economic power but more than that. Mari- time has become a geopolitical force to unite the archipelago. Geopolitical power has strength- ened the steps of the kingdoms in the archipelago to increase their political bargaining power against countries in the surrounding region and countries in the world. The strengthening of maritime as a geopolitical force will of course have implications for other sectors, especially in the development sector of land transportation and sea transportation. This implication is very well understood by the leaders of this country. But still until now, maritime development must be put forward because the strength and bargaining value of this country rests on maritime affairs. Apart from being a geopolitical power, there is also a very large economic power contained in it. Even though Indonesia was late in realizing this, President Gus Dur had formed a Department of Marine Exploration which is now the Ministry of Maritime Affairs. Indonesia’s maritime geopolitical strength has been identified in three main straits which are used by the international community as a passage for various ships with large weights so that Indonesia must be more closely monitoring these sea lanes. The three straits are the Malacca Strait, the Sunda Strait and the Lombok Strait. Indonesia must be able to regulate international maritime shipping so that it can play a strategic role in the world political arena.
PERPPU, Bukan Solusi Akhir Pembubaran Ormas Tinjauan Politik dan Hukum Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 1, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (256.388 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v1i1.103

Abstract

Organisasi kemasyarakatan yang terbentuk di Indonesia memiliki tujuan yangberbeda-beda sesuai dengan keinginan kelompok yang membentuknya. Dari sekian banyakorganisasi tersebut, terdapat pula organisasi yang dibentuk untuk tujuan meraih kekuasaan.Terdapatnya organisasi kemasyarakatan radikal yang sering melakukan kegiatan anarkisdi Indonesia telah membuat pemerintah Indonesia harus melakukan pengendalianberupa pembatasan-pembatasan, mulai dari pengendalian ijin kegiatan, tempat kegiatan,seperti yang diatur dalam UU No.17/2013 tentang organisasi kemasyarakatan.UU No.17/2013 tersebut ternyata belum mampu untuk mengatur keberadaan organisasikemasyarakatan secara komprehensif hingga keluarlah Peraturan Pemerintah PenggantiUndang-Undang nomor 2/2017 tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 17/2013.Pembatasan yang sudah dilakukan, sering kali tidak efektif untuk mengendalikan organisasikemasyarakatan karena tidak diimbangi oleh tindakan tegas berupa pembubaran.Pembubaran yang dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang tentang ormas pun tidak serta mertadapat membubarkan ideologi organisasi kemasyarakatan tersebut sehingga gerakan organisasitanpa nama atau tanpa bentuk (OTB) pun menjadi pilihannya dan mereka selaluberlindung di bawah Undang Undang Dasar 1945 pasal 28E ayat 3 yang menyatakansetiap orang berhak atas kebebasan berserikat, berkumpul dan mengeluarkan pendapat.Klausul inilah yang menyulitkan pemerintah dalam membubarkan organisasi kemasyarakatanyang berbahaya bagi bangsa dan negara. Sehingga solusi yang penulistawarkan dalam mengatur keberadaan organisasi kemasyarakatan di Indonesia adalahmelakukan amandemen UUD 1945 dengan menambahkan kewenangan pada lembagaMahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang bukan saja diberikan untuk membubarkan PartaiPolitik tetapi diberikan pula kewenangan untuk membubarkan organisasi kemasyarakatanyang berbahaya bagi kelangsungan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara.
FAKTOR – FAKTOR PENGARUH EFEKTIVITAS KEBIJAKAN SEKOLAH Studi Kasus SMK PGRI Klungkung A. A Ngr. A. Wira Bima Wikrama; Ni Ketut Ari Utami
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 4, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v4i2.305

Abstract

The world of formal education is one of the factors in producing quality human resources (HR), and is an absolute requirement for creating quality work and results. Many factors influence the educational process. One of the most decisive is school policy. School policy will greatly depend on the role of a teacher as an educator in carrying out educational activities and supervision of the school policy system to produce good and quality educational performance. Teachers who are qualified and show effective performance will greatly affect the performance of education itself. This is also what should apply and run at SMK PGRI Klungkung.This study focuses on the Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of School Policies. The research method was carried out with qualitative descriptions combined with quantitative and data analysis using descriptive narratives, namely data reduction, data presentation and triangulation.The results of the study indicate that there are eight factors that influence the effectiveness of school policies. Therefore, the effectiveness of school policies in improving educational performance at SMK PGRI Klungkung has a very good category in terms of planning, management, reporting and evaluation systems. 
Manipol Usdek Sebagai Tantangan Pendidikan Pada Jaman Reformasi Bagi Generasi Penerus Bangsa I Made Arka; Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v4i1.235

Abstract

Manipol USDEK adalah Manisfesto Politik dari Presiden Soekarno atas keadaan Bangsa Indonesia yang terjadi pada 5 Juli 1959 terkait pertanggunjawaban presiden yang isinya yaitu: 1) Undang - Undang Dasar 1945, 2) Sosialisme Indonesia, 3) Demokrasi Terpimpin, 4) Ekonomi Terpimpin, 5) Kepribadian Bangsa Indonesia. Manipol USDEK dapat dikaitkan dalam situasi pendidikan pada jaman reformasi untuk mendapatkan jalan keluar permasalah bangsa dalam memajukan rakyat Indonesia menjadi masyarakat yang cerdas, berbudi pekerti, dan mempunyai karakter nasionalisme dalam membangun Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Dalam perjalanan Bangsa Indonesia yang dari negara terjajah sampai menjadi negara berkembang dan menuju negara maju perlu diulas kembali maksud dan tujuan dari pertanggungjawaban Presiden Soekarno agar masyarakat tahu sejarah bangsa Indonesia dalam menjalankan roda kepemerintahan. Pada jaman reformasi ini perkembangan teknologi sangat pesat maka perlu diselaraskan antara konsep yang disiapkan dan konsep tindaklajut keadaan perkembangan situasi bangsa agar jangan masyarakat hanya terpaku dalam kejadian masa lalu yang mengakibatkan bangsa ini menjadi paranoid terhadap perkembangan jaman. Maka hanya melalui pendidikan rakyat Indonesia bisa membangun bangsa ini lebih baik dan bisa bersaing di kancah internasional jika pendidikan yang tepat dapat diberikan kepada generasi penerus bangsa
Pusaka Rempah Di Negeri Maritim Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 2, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (221.275 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v2i1.118

Abstract

Spice inheritance in the oceanic country affairs can be used as a mirror for us,because the storyline of the Republic of Indonesia in facing future challenges wich is verymulti-dimensional seems to fade away, there fore many groups lately often discuss backto the 1945 Constitution. In fact, many of them rolled out “NKRI Harga Mati”. So far,all efforts have been made is a productive or preventive action in compousting together astring of reunion a sovereign country, which is always on the moves in an atmosphere ofopposition and full of competitions. It seems that this nation and country have not beenable to utilize the cultural and scientific treasures, local and national wisdom to appearcreative in solving their problems and dare to take the greatest risks and formulate uniqueenigmatic solutions into a large current in preserving the history of maritime culture.Starting from the philosophy that our beaches face each other and the islands are ours. Sothat the palace and the traditional institutions contained inside running to regulate the people.Secondly Pamalayu Expedition is a military diplomatic expedition carried out by theSingasari Kingdom during The King Kertanagara’s dated 1275-1293 against the Malay’sKingdom (also known as the Kingdom of Dharmasraya or the Kingdom of Jambi). At thattime, the Singasari Kingdom wanted the entire Southeast Asian region to be ruled. Surelythey already understood the maritime, defense equipments and the shipping knowledge. The thirdly Srivijaya as the monumenthal of the first millennium in the maritime world,was able to remove the silk’s journey which was originally by land, then changed by seaand cancelled the Tordesilas Agreement made by the Papacy which divided the sea intotwo regions namely the western and eastern regions. Srivijaya could prove and dismissthe notion that parts of the sea after India were apparently not ruled by hooligans, pirates,and etc. The fourthly Majapahit Kingdom was able to unite and organize all the maritimeelements in the archipelago led by the sea commander in comand named Ranggalawe andsupported by the national shipping conglomerate at the time named Nyai Kanggotan whohad a shipping industry centered in Tuban with the strength of forces more than 3200 Javajung or Javanese tradicional ships.
Politik Mahar Di Indonesia: Antara Ada dan Tiada Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 1, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2263.233 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v1i2.13

Abstract

Political parties are the only institution that has the right to propose candi- dates for president and vice president as stipulated in Article 6A paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution so that they will have power and legitimacy as heads of state and heads of government. These constitutional rights are not owned by any democratic institution other than political parties. However, in the process of holding the general election, it does not always go as expected, as stated in the KPU’s laws and regulations. There were irregulari- ties committed by candidates and by political parties in the form of Money Politics.According to the political dowry event is in the general election area based on the legal principle of Lex specialis derogat legimitation generaly which states that the law is specific (lex specialis) overrides the general law (lex generalis) the Money Politic event is resolved by an institution, namely Bawaslu (General Election Supervisory Board).Besides the Article 6A paragraph 2 of the 1945, there is also Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment of Law No. 1 in 2015 concerning the stipulation of Perppu (the governmental regulation of low amandement) Number 1 in 2014 according to the governor’s election, regents and mayors, especially in Article 47, Article 187A,Article 187B, Article 187C and Article 187D which regulates general elections. But in reality there are many irregularities in the implementation of the Constitution and etc.Events in the form of political dowry still occured which is evidenced by the infor- mation given by several witnesses and as the victim and perpetrator of the political dowry. Surprisingly, the General Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) as an election watchdog institution mandated by the Act to enforce the prevailing regulations is very difficult to carry out its duties, reminding that Bawaslu has weaknesses in handling the alleged polit- ical dowry. The weakness of Bawaslu is that they do not have the power to take witnesses or people who will be questioned.The author argues that there is a need for a legal protection in the form of a law that provides better opportunities to Bawaslu so that the position of Bawaslu as an election supervisory bord can be much stronger.
Pemilihan Umum Indonesia Antara Demokrasi Pancasila Dan Demokrasi Liberal Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (197.355 KB) | DOI: 10.47532/jic.v2i2.124

Abstract

General election is a tools or facility in implementing democracy which is carried outdirectly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly. This is in accordance with the principle ofdemocracy, namely from the people, by the people, and for the people as mandated by Article 1paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution. The election is believed to be only as one instrument to encouragethe democratic process. Because the increase of mature democracy will reduce injustice and makepeople's lives more secure in their freedom and encourage the creation more a fair. However,democracy which is carried out through general election in Indonesia now adays is not democracy andthe general which is election very suitable for Indonesia. Indonesia has a democratic style mechanismand only exists in Indonesia. Indonesian democracy has been very clearly stated in the 4th principle ofPancasila, which is popularly led by wisdom in deliberation / representation. For this reason,awareness is needed by state leaders and elected board members to be able to understand and explorethe values and spirits of Indonesians style democracy. So that Indonesians democracy is getting closerto the spirit and body of Indonesias people.
DESAK ADAT ASAK MENUJU DESA WISATA Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama
MEDIA BINA ILMIAH Vol 15, No 12: Juli 2021
Publisher : BINA PATRIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33758/mbi.v15i12.1150

Abstract

Bali is a tourist area that is well known both in Indonesia and in the Five Countries. The fragrant name of Bali is a strong attraction for tourists who want to visit Bali and enjoy Bali with its natural and cultural attractions. All districts in Bali have tourist centers both large and small. Starting from the appearance of natural beauty, tradition and culture. All districts have their own peculiarities. Likewise with Karangasem Regency at the East end of the island of Bali. Karangasem Regency has one very unique village, namely Dinas Pertima Village, Karangasem District and its Adat Village called Asak Adat Village. In this article, the writer will present the interesting aspects of Asak Indigenous Village including the origin of the name of Asak Indigenous Village, geographical location, demography, uniqueness, potential and historical heritage of Asak Indigenous Village which can be used as tourist attractions. From each of the sub discussion above, the writer tries to outline in more detail about the intricacies of the Asak Indigenous Village starting from daily life, activities in earning a living, traditional, artistic and religious activities of the Indigenous Asak Village community so that readers can understand and appreciate the desire of the local community to be able to preserve values, customs and religions and traditions that have lasted for generations but can also develop the tourism sector to support the economic resilience of the community and customary institutions in the Asak Adat Village