Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika

MENELISIK METODOLOGI HISAB-RUKYAT DI INDONESIA Sakirman, Sakirman
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Hukum Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This paper deals with the significance of the methods of calculation (ḥisāb) and observation (ru’yah) in determining the beginning of month in Islamic calendar, especially months of Ramaḍān, Shawwāl and Żū al-Ḥijjah, since these months have relationship with sacred Islamic rituals. However, Muslims should review and reexamine the basic method employed in determining  beginning of month in Islamic calendar. Classical dichotomy that has led to controversy until these days relates to ḥisāb and ru’yah. Some said that ru’yah method is final and decisive while ḥisāb is only supporting ru’yah. Others said that it is ḥisāb that is final and decisive, while ru’yah is used to support the method of ḥisāb. From this dispute, there should be a meeting point; that is, ru’yah should be supported by accurate science of ḥisāb.Kata Kunci: Metodologi, Hisab, Rukyat
MENELISIK METODOLOGI HISAB-RUKYAT DI INDONESIA Sakirman, Sakirman
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 8, No 2 (2011): HUKUM ISLAM
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper deals with the significance of the methods of calculation (ḥisāb) and observation (ru’yah) in determining the beginning of month in Islamic calendar, especially months of  Ramaḍān, Shawwāl and Żū al-Ḥijjah, since these months have relationship with sacred Islamic rituals. However, Muslims should review and reexamine the basic method employed in determining  beginning of month in Islamic calendar. Classical dichotomy that has led to controversy until these days relates to ḥisāb and ru’yah. Some said that ru’yah method is final and decisive while ḥisāb is only supporting ru’yah. Others said that it is ḥisāb that is final and decisive, while ru’yah is used to support the method of ḥisāb. From this dispute, there should be a meeting point; that is, ru’yah should be supported by accurate science of ḥisāb.
Telaah Hukum Islam terhadap Nasab Anak Sakirman, Sakirman
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 12, No 2 (2015): HUKUM ISLAM
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The classical scholars of jurisprudence agreed that nasab child has only nasab relationship to his parents, nasab determination is one of the most important rights of a child and is something that a lot of impact on the childs personality and future. Fiqh scholars say that the concept nasab is one solid foundation in building a domestic life that can bind between individuals based on the unity of blood. In Indonesia Islamic law, the problem of the origin of the child, there are several different legal provisions. It is influenced by a plurality of the nation, especially in terms of religion and customs, the applicable law is varied. There are laws, ie Islamic law (fiqh) formulated in a fixed rule the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI).
MENELISIK METODOLOGI HISAB-RUKYAT DI INDONESIA Sakirman, Sakirman
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 8 No 2 (2011): HUKUM ISLAM
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/jsi.v8i2.368.341-362

Abstract

This paper deals with the significance of the methods of calculation (ḥisāb) and observation (ru’yah) in determining the beginning of month in Islamic calendar, especially months of  Ramaḍān, Shawwāl and Żū al-Ḥijjah, since these months have relationship with sacred Islamic rituals. However, Muslims should review and reexamine the basic method employed in determining  beginning of month in Islamic calendar. Classical dichotomy that has led to controversy until these days relates to ḥisāb and ru’yah. Some said that ru’yah method is final and decisive while ḥisāb is only supporting ru’yah. Others said that it is ḥisāb that is final and decisive, while ru’yah is used to support the method of ḥisāb. From this dispute, there should be a meeting point; that is, ru’yah should be supported by accurate science of ḥisāb.
Telaah Hukum Islam terhadap Nasab Anak Sakirman, Sakirman
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 12 No 2 (2015): HUKUM ISLAM
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/jsi.v12i2.398.357-375

Abstract

The classical scholars of jurisprudence agreed that nasab child has only nasab relationship to his parents, nasab determination is one of the most important rights of a child and is something that a lot of impact on the child's personality and future. Fiqh scholars say that the concept nasab is one solid foundation in building a domestic life that can bind between individuals based on the unity of blood. In Indonesia Islamic law, the problem of the origin of the child, there are several different legal provisions. It is influenced by a plurality of the nation, especially in terms of religion and customs, the applicable law is varied. There are laws, ie Islamic law (fiqh) formulated in a fixed rule the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI).