Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Signifikansi Maqâsid al-Sharî‘ah sebagai Kerangka Berpikir Epistemik Ijtihad Sanuri, Sanuri
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 8, No 2 (2014): Islamica
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2014.8.2.316-340

Abstract

This paper focuses on the importance of maqâsid al-sharî‘ah for the effectiveness of ijtihad in Islamic law. The emergence of controversies at the beginning of the tenth century AD on the issue of the closing of the gate of ijtihâd has resulted in the rigidity of Islamic law and its methodological framework. Along with these issues, some contemporary scholars on maqâsid agreed that sharî‘ah law (al-Qur’ân) consists of partial (juz’îyât) and universal values (kullîyyât) that should be understood through a holistic approach in the frameworks of maqâsid. Shift in the meaning and orientation of maqâsid al-sharî‘ah in some contemporary Muslim scholars’ views, involving social sciences, philosophy of law, principles of morality, universality, social justice, human dignity, human rights, is a concrete manifestation of how Islamic law is able to provide answers to the current problems faced by the Muslim and non-Muslims community. This awareness has made contemporary Muslim thinkers strive to bring Islamic law into various achievements of progress in many aspects of life by emphasizing the importance of maqâsid al-sharî‘ah.
Dinamika Wacana Pluralisme Keagamaan di Indonesia Sanuri, Sanuri
Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Vol 2 No 1 (2012): March
Publisher : Program Studi Studi Agama-Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (367.351 KB)

Abstract

Religious plurality in Indonesia context is interesting enough to be discussed. The plurality of culture, race, ethnic and religion constitutes a social condition that often becomes disintegrated major. Pluralism in the context of religion such as Islam has a pivotal role in dealing with such issue. In Islam, all religions and beliefs are believed to have the right of life. But for a certain group, this matter is considered as a faith destruction of Muslim. This article discusses the response from both internal and external groups of Islam concerning with the understanding of Islam to religious pluralism which is currently considered as a trend of globalization and modernization—apparently raises ideological suspicions or even new ideologies. Therefore, an effort to re-actualization of meanings and values into the frame of Islamization, SIPILIS (secularism, pluralism and liberalism) in Indonesian context is necessary. In addition, re-interpretation of the term “religious pluralism” will be more oriented to an attempt to search mutual understanding of different cultures, religions, races and tribes. In this context, the social construction method and socio-historical, moral ethics, and theological-philosophical approach under the central issues within a religious pluralism spectrum such as global theology, universal theology, universal friendship, culminated tradition, private faith, relative truth, the real, relative truth, universality and Humanism of Islam are very essential.
Social Justice Under Perspective of Philosophy of Law and Maqâsid Al-Sharî‘Ah Sanuri, Sanuri
TEOSOFI: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2012): December
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (699.921 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2012.2.2.407-431

Abstract

Justice in the philosophy of law becomes a core which must be met through the existing law. Aristotle asserted that justice as the core of the legal philosophy can be understood in terms of numerical equality and equality of proportion. He also distinguished the type of justice into distributive justice and corrective justice. Meanwhile, John Rawls asserted that the enforcement of justice has a social dimension or well-known with social and reciprocal benefits. In Islam, justice is discussed as a matter of theology of divine justice that later emerged the two schools of thought; Mu?tazilah and Ash?arîyah. In addition, the theory of justice is also a fundamental theme in the philosophy of Islamic law, particularly in the discussion of maqâsid al-sharî?ah which asserts that Islamic law is regulated to create and protect the social benefits to mankind. The theory of social benefit was initially introduced by Imam al-Haramayn al-Juwaynî then developed by his student, al-Ghazâlî. The next Islamic legal theorist that specifically discussed about maqâsid al-sharî?ah was ?Izz al-Dîn b. ?Abd. al-Salâm of Shafi?îah. And the discussion about maqâsid al-sharî?ah in a systematic and clear way was carried out by al-Shâtibî of Malikîyah in his book al-Muwâfaqât. In addition, al-Tûfî also provides radical and liberal views about the theory of social benefit. Justice in the philosophy of law becomes a core which must be met through the existing law. Aristotle asserted that justice as the core of the legal philosophy can be understood in terms of numerical equality and equality of proportion. He also distinguished the type of justice into distributive justice and corrective justice. Meanwhile, John Rawls asserted that the enforcement of justice has a social dimension or well-known with social and reciprocal benefits. In Islam, justice is discussed as a matter of theology of divine justice that later emerged the two schools of thought; Mu?tazilah and Ash?arîyah. In addition, the theory of justice is also a fundamental theme in the philosophy of Islamic law, particularly in the discussion of maqâsid al-sharî?ah which asserts that Islamic law is regulated to create and protect the social benefits to mankind. The theory of social benefit was initially introduced by Imam al-H{aramayn al-Juwaynî then developed by his student, al-Ghazâlî. The next Islamic legal theorist that specifically discussed about maqâsid al-sharî?ah was ?Izz al-Dîn b. ?Abd. al-Salâm of Shafi?îah. And the discussion about maqâsid al-sharî?ah in a systematic and clear way was carried out by al-Shâtibî of Malikîyah in his book al-Muwâfaqât. In addition, al-T{ûfî also provides radical and liberal views about the theory of social benefit. Keywords:Social justice, philosophy, Islamic law, maqâsid al-sharî?ah.
ANALISIS PENGARUH FAKTOR INTERNAL DAN EKSTERNAL TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN SAHAM PERBANKAN BUMN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI PERIODE 2010-2014 Sanuri, Sanuri; Kusuma, Desta Rizky
Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis Vol 6, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/fokus.v6i2.1662

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of factors internal and external to the return of registered banking shares Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2014. The population in this study were 4 BUMN bank companies registered in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2010-2014 sampling techniques used is purposive sampling. obtained by 4 state-owned bank companies included in the independent variable criterion studied is Return On Assets (ROA), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Inflation Rate, and Rate of Interest Interest and the dependent variable studied is stock returns. Analysis Techniques used is Panel Data Regression and Hypothesis test using t-test. The results showed that both variables were simultaneously independent Return On Asset (ROA) has no effect on stock returns Partially the variables of the four independent variables are Return On Assets (ROA), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Inflation and Interest Rates are only Inflation and Interest rates that have a significant effect on stock returns. R-square value 33.42%.