Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS IX SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA YANG BERKEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA TINGGI DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi; Muhtarom Muhtarom
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v1i2.9930

Abstract: This study aim to describe the students’ thinking process of 9th grade of Junior High School has a high mathematics capability in solving the mathematics problem based on Polya rule. This study is qualitative descriptive research. The criteria of subject selection included the students’ has a high mathematics capability and communication fluency both spoken and written. The data collection was done using written test and task-based interview techniques. Data analysis done based on written test data and task-based interview techniques data. And then it has been done the method triangulation to get valid subject data. Finally, the result of description thinking process as follows: students with high mathematics capability, in understanding problem using assimilation thinking process, make a plan using assimilation and accommodation thinking process. Assimilation thinking process can be identified when the students can mention the prerequisite material, can directly relate the sides kite (BF = FG) and can directly develop problem solving plan. Meanwhile, accommodation thinking process can be seen when the students drew an auxiliary line from E to the right thereby intersecting with CD line (the intersection was labeled H point), so devided trapezoid AEDG become right triangle EHG and rectangle AEHD. In carrying out a plan and in looking back at the completed solution, the students used assimilation thinking process. Keywords: thinking process, mathematics problem, and problem solving.

PROSES BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PEMBUKTIAN TAHUN AKADEMIK 2014/2015 Dian Devita Yohanie; Imam Sujadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10048

Abstract: This research aimed to describe the thinking process in proof problem solving using direct, contraposition, and contradiction methods in 2nd semester mathematic education students of Nusantara PGRI University of Kediri with (1) high, (2) moderate, and (3) low learning achievements. The research method employed was qualitative approach. Subject of research was selected using purposive sampling technique, consisting of 6 2nd-semester mathematic education students: 2 students with high, 2 with moderate, and 2 with low learning achievements. Data collection was carried out using interview based on proof problem solving assignment. Data validation was carried out using time triangulation, and the valid data was analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The result of research showed that: (1) The thinking process of students with high learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly and completely, did algebraic operation to connect consequence to premise, in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing the process and proof result. (2) The thinking process of students with moderate learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer when their proved. (3) The thinking process of students with low learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase is the same, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise difficultly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise using number example, thereby could not prove the consequence. Then in review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing their proof result.Keywords: Thinking Process, Problem Solving, Proof, Learning Achievement

EFEKTIVITAS STRATEGI HEURISTIK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METAKOGNITIF DAN PENDEKATAN INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI POKOK BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS XII MADRASAH ALIYAH DI PONTIANAK Yudi Darma; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v1i2.9932

Abstract: The purposes of this research are to know of the effectiveness of heuristic learning strategy approach category, creativity, and its interaction to studentss mathematics problem solving ability on material series and sequence. This research is quasi experimental research with factorial design 2 x 3. The population is the studentss of class XII Madrasah Aliyah at Pontianak City the schools odd semester academic year of 2011/2012. The sampling was taken by using stratified cluster random. Sample of the research is 186 studentss. Data collecting is done through school document, problem solving essay test ability and creativity questionnaire. Instrument analysis that was done on essays problem solving ability is content validity, consist of analysis degree of differences, index of difficulty and reliability. Analysis on creativity questionnaire is content validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Data analysis technique used consisting of: Balance test, precondition analysis (Normality and Homogeneity). Hypothesis analysis test used was two way analysis of variance with unequal cell. Using α = 0.05 it can be concluded that: 1) Students who had been taught by using metacognitive learning approach result the better mathematics problem solving ability compared to students who had been taught by using investigation learning approach. 2) Students who have high creativity has better problem solving ability than students that have medium and low creativity, and students that have medium creativity have better problem solving ability than students who have low creativity. 3) Students who were taught by using metacognitive and also investigation learning approach, who have high creativity have better problem solving ability than students with medium and low creativity, and students who have medium creativity have better problem solving ability than students who have low creativity. 4) On high creativity level category, students who were taught by metacognitive learning approach have better mathematics problem solving ability than studentss who were taught by using investigation learning approach. Meanwhile on medium and low creativity, students who were taught by using metacognitive learning approach have the same mathematics problem solving ability with studentss who were taught by using investigation approach.Key words: Heuristic strategy, Metacognitive, Investigation, Creativity and Problem Solving.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA PEMBELAJARAN DIMENSI TIGA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Tarmo Tarmo; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9996

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which one providing better learning achievement, the Jigsaw learning model, GI or direct instruction; 2) which one having better learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low emotional quotient (EQ); 3) in each category of EQ, which one providing better learning achievement, the Jigsaw, GI or direct instruction; 4) in each type of the learning model, which one having better learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low EQ. This research was a quasi-experimental research using factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research were all students of the Public Senior High Schools in Wonogiri Regency. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples of the research were tenth grade students of SMA N 1 Wonogiri, SMA N 2 Wonogiri, and SMA N 1 Sidoharjo. In collecting the data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. The technique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the Jigsaw result in a better learning achievement than GI and direct instruction, the GI result in a better learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) the students with the high EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the medium or low EQ, the students with the medium EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the low EQ; (3) the students with the low EQ, the Jigsaw, GI and direct instruction have the same learning achievement; the students with the medium EQ, the Jigsaw and GI result in the same learning achievement, the GI learning model and direct instruction result in the same learning achievement and the Jigsaw result in a better learning achievement than direct instruction; the students with the high EQ the Jigsaw and GI result in the same learning achievement, and both result in a better learning achievement than the direct instruction; (4) in the Jigsaw and GI, the students with the low and medium EQ result in the same learning achievement, but students with the high EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the low or medium EQ, in the direct instruction, the students with the low, medium and high EQ result in the same learning achievement.Key words: learning model, Jigsaw, GI, emotional quotient.

PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 2 SEMEN KEDIRI BERDASARKAN TAHAP PROSES BERPIKIR SOLSO DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Anis Hanafiah; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10060

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to describe (1) Thinking process of climber students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics. (2) Thinking process of camper students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics (3) Thinking process of quitter students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics. The thinking process in this research uses steps of Solso thinking, forming concept, logically, and taking decision. This research is qualitative descriptive research. The subjects in this research are taken by purposive sampling. The subjects of this research are 3 students from grade VII SMPN 2 Semen, they are 1 student of climber type, 1 student of campers type, and 1 student of quitters type. The data collection of this research uses polling and questionaire technic based on duties that is done for comparison material. The legality of data used in this research is triangulation time and using reference sufficience. The technic of data analysis used is Miles and Huberman concept, these are data reduction, giving data and getting conclution. The results of this research show that (1) the thinking process of climber students, in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem that have done: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision; (b) arranging the plan for problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (c) doing the plan of problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (d) recheck the result by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision; (2) The thinking process of camper students in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (b) arranging the plan for problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) not taking decision. (c) doing the plan for problem solving, by (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (d) recheck the result by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) not taking decision. (3) The thinking process of quitter students in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem by, (i) forming concept, (ii) not thinking logically, (iii) can’t take decision. (b) planning for problem soving: (i) not forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) can’t take decision, (c) can’t run for the probem solving. (d) not rechecking the problem solving.Keywords: thinking process, problem solving, Adversity Quotient (AQ)

PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA KELAS X MAN NGAWI DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH BERDASARKAN LANGKAH KRULIK DAN RUDNICK DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL MATEMATIKA Ulfa Masamah; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i1.10008

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe reflective thinking process of 10th grade MAN Ngawi students with different initial mathematics capability (high, normal, low) in solving problems based on Krulik and Rudnick steps. This research was a kind of qualitative research on a case study. The collecting data in this study used task-based on interview method. The analyzed of the data in this study did with reducing the data, presenting the data, and conclusing the data. The results of this research were: 1) on reading and thinking step, students with normal and low initial mathematics capability convince what they read and thought correctly by reading repeatedly. Students with high initial mathematics capability did it by reading and understanding each question sentences repeatedly; 2) on exploring and planing step, selecting and considering information, both students with high and normal initial mathematics capability did these steps by information identification and analysis of main problems and conditions; to convince that initial problem solving planning was right, they did it by organizing problem and deciding the initial steps planned; 3) on selecting a strategy step, to consider confidently the problem solving step based on information obtained, students with high initial mathematics capability did the step by exploring initial problem solving strategy and using representation result by trial-error and guessing test, concerning problem solving pattern, and recheck every step done. Students with normal initial capability did it by exploring initial problem solving strategy and using representation result by trial-error step, making proper initial plan by question stimulation. 4) on finding an answer step, to understand each steps based on selected problem solving strategy, both students with high and normal initial mathematics capability did it by (a) ascertain formula that used for the area of that shapes, triangle area if known two sides which flank an angle, and comparing trigonometry on special angle correctly (students with normal capability used question stimuly); (b) trying repeatedly using selected patterns and recheck every step and calculation done; and (c) aware of each mistakes (computation, formula, way, and writing) and fixed them (students with normal capability needed question stimuly and wrong answering strategy). Student with high initial capability combined the process by paying attention and rechecking every steps and calculation by step back process. 5) on reflecting and extending step, to considering results and problems, students with high initial mathematics capability did it by reflection to get solution and rechecking by verification process. Students with normal capability did it by rechecking and looking back the problem and result obtained. In every steps, students with high initial mathematics capability always used intuition and self-questioning to convince the step done. 10th grade MAN Ngawi students with low initial mathematics capability did not use reflective thinking in problem solving based on Krulik and Rudnick.Keywords: Process, reflective thinking, problem solving, and initial mathematics capability.

KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 MOJOLABAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Nor Khoiriyah; Imam Sujadi; Sri Subanti
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10040

Abstract. The purpose of this research was to describe the ability of student’s mathematical communication who had low, medium, and high early mathematics ability in class VII SMP Negeri 1 Mojolaban on aspect grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence in solving mathematics problem. This research was a qualitative research. The subjects in this research were seven students of class VIIE SMP Negeri 1 Mojolaban, which consisted of three students who had low early mathematical ability, two students who had medium early mathematics ability, and two students who had high early mathematical ability.The subjects in this research were taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The main instrument used in this research to collect the data was the researcher and the other instrument were a task that contains of test question and interview guide instrument. Data analysis technique were conducted by data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The validity of the data was conducted by using time triangulation that compared the data of the first task based interviews with the data of the second task based interviews. The equal valid data of mathematical communication ability on aspect grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence was made the main finding, whereas the different of valid data was made other finding of the research. The result of this research are the students who had low, medium, and high early mathematics abilities were have imperfect mathematical communication on grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence. The imperfection that appear on each competence caused by some indicators that not fulfilled completely.Keywords: Mathematical communication, grammatical competence, discourse competence

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN SCAFFOLDING BERBASIS MODUL PADA MATERI GEOMETRIDIMENSI TIGA DITINJAUDARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMK KELAS XI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Hartono Hartono; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10030

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning models of Team Assisted Individualization learning model with scaffolding based on module (TAI-S), Team Assisted Individualization learning model (TAI), or direct learning model (DL) results in a better learning achievement in the material of three-dimensional geometry; (2) which independence category of student learning, high, medium or low results in a better learning achievement on the material of three-dimensional geometry; (3) in each category of student learning independence, which learning models of the TAI-S, TAI, or DL model results in better learning achievement on the material of three-dimensional geometry. This research used the quasi experimental method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all the students in Grade XI of Vocational High Schools in Sragen regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified random sampling technique. The data of the research were gathered through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The documentation was employed to investigate the scores of semester test in Mathematics of the students in Semester 1, Academic Year 2012/2013, and was used for balance test among the classes exposed to the TAI-S, TAI, and DL models. The questionnaire was used to find out the independence category of student learning. The test was used to know the students learning achievement in Mathematics with material of three-dimensional geometry. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the TAI-S learning model result in a better learning achievement than both the TAI and DL models. There are no any differences in the learning achievement of the students with the TAI learning model and DL model. (2) the students with the high independence category result in better learning achievement than students with medium and low independence category. The students with medium independence category result in better learning achievement than students in low independence category (3) in each category of student learning independence, based on the material of three-dimensional geometry, the TAI-S learning model, TAI learning model and DL model do not have correlation between one and another.Keywords : TAI-S learning model, TAI learning model, DL learning. Three Dimensional Geometry, Learning Independence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL Habib Ratu Perwira Negara; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i2.9978

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.Keywords: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW BERBANTU MEDIA FLASH PADAMATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Rina Kurniawati; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20244

Abstract: This research was purposed to determine: (1) which one produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash, or direct instruction; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each learning style, which one learning model that produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash or direct instruction (4) on each learning model, which one student had better mathematics learning achievement , student who had visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style. This study was a quasi-experimental study with factorial 3x3 design. Population in this research were eleventh grade students of Vocational High School in Sragen. Sample collection were done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data collection were done by the method of documentation in order to test the balance of the population, the questionnaire were used to determine the students learning style and test were used to know the students achievement on material dimension three. Data analysis techniques used ANAVA two ways with unbalanced cells. The results of this study concluded as follows (1) cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) Students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style; students with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style; (3) on each learning style, cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (4) on each learning model (Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, and direct instruction), students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style.Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, Learning Style, learning achievement

Title

Found 44 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 44 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 44 Documents
Search