This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE'RECHTSSTAAT
Gina Yunita
Faculty of Law, Djuanda University

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

CONSIDERATION OF PANEL OF JUDGES IN THE CASE OF JOINT PROPERTY AGREEMENT TOWARDS POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGE INRELIGIOUS COURT OF CIBINONG CLASS 1B Gina Yunita
JURNAL HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): JURNAL HUKUM "DE'RECHTSSTAAT"
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (645.93 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v4i1.1237

Abstract

A man who has more than one wife is called polygamy. A polygamy often creates legal uncertainty about joint property. The purpose of writing this thesis is to analyze the legal certainty of joint property in polygamous marriage. The research method which used in this paper is Juridical Research Methods with Sociological Approach (Empirical). Authority of the Cibinong Religious Court in examining the case of the joint treasure agreement in polygamous marriage, the Muslim husband who wishes to have more than one wife is required to apply for polygamy permission to the Religious Court under the conditions as set forth in Article 4 and Article 5 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 about Marriage. Regarding the petition for polygamy permit, it is combined with a joint property appointment request which filed by a spouse or husband who files a joint property agreement reconvention. A married husband of more than one person is governed in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the separation of joint property separated in the mediation room, this agreement is made or before or at the time of marriage takes place, which then authorized by religious affairs office (KUA) for Muslims and may be signed before the notary. The consideration of the Panel of Judges about the joint property agreement in polygamous marriage is seen only through evidence at that time which causing injustice to the first wife since there is no explicit law  that regulates t the distribution of joint property in polygamous marriage. Therefore, we need protection of law which is preventive and repressive