Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Representation of Teacher in Andrea Hirata’s Novel Guru Aini: A Study of Literary Psychology Evi Chamalah; Reni Nuryyati; S. T. Nurbaya
Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research Vol 1, No 2 (2020): December 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (146.929 KB) | DOI: 10.30659/jamr.1.2.121-132

Abstract

Novel is one of literary works that is quite enjoyed by people. Novel has an important position in describing the reality of life through its storylines. One of them is Guru Aini novel by Andrea Hirata. The novel, which was just published in 2020, told about a teacher who workedin a remote island in Indonesia. The author's view of the teacher as an educator who could be represented by this literary work is constructed in a novel. Based on this, the study aimed to determine the representation of teachers in the Guru Aini novel by Andrea Hirata. The analysis in the research was conducted through the dimensions of literary psychology. The analysis in this study focused on the role of the teacher as an educator in a literary work. The results in this study indicated that the teacher in the novel Guru Aini by Andrea Hirata was represented in a positively charged construction. In this study, it was found that several teacher representations appeared in the novel, namely the representation of the teacher as an individual status, the representation of the teacher as the status of the teaching force, the representation of the teacher as an educator in the community, the representation of the psychological condition of the teacher, and the representation of the teacher's personality in the novel Guru Aini by Andrea Hirata.
Model bahan ajar membaca pemahaman berbasis teks dengan pendekatan content language integrited learning St Nurbaya; Dwi Hanti Rahayu
Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/hum.v18i2.29238

Abstract

This study aimed to develop reading material teaching based on text with a content language integrated learning approach for students of PBSI FBS UNY. Development design followed the design model developed by Willis, known as the R2D2 model (1995), with steps (1) defining 2) planning and development, 3) dissemination. Products whose developed are text-based reading teaching materials with the CLIL approach. The products have been assessed by peers, reading learning experts, and lecturers of reading comprehension courses. There are five types of texts developed into teaching materials, namely; 1) description text, exposition text, argumentation text, editorial text, and research proposal text. Each text is used as a learning unit. Each learning unit was divided into; 1) learning objectives, 20 teaching materials, 3) texts, and 4) evaluation of learning. The assessment instrument used the teaching material assessment rubric with 4 components, scaled 1-4. The four assessment components; 1) content eligibility with a mean value of 23.00 or with a very good category, 2) language with a mean value of 14.00 or good category, 3) presentation with a mean of 19.30 or in a very good category while the component, 4) the design gets a mean value of 14.60 or good category. Overall, research development on instructional materials is at an average rate of 17.72 or a good category.Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan bahan ajar membaca pemahaman berbasis teks dengan pendekatan content language integrited learning untuk mahasiswa PBSI FBS UNY. Desain pengembangan mengikuti model desain yang dikembangkan oleh Willis yang lebih dikenal dengan model R2D2 (1995,) dengan langkah (1) pendefinisian 2) perencanaan dan pengembangan, 3) penyebarluasan. Produk temuan hasil pengembangan adalah bahan ajar membaca berbasis teks dengan pendekatan CLIL. Produk telah dinilai oleh teman sejawat, pakar pembelajaran membaca, dan dosen-dosen mata kuliah membaca pemahaman. Jenis teks yang dikembangkan menjadi bahan ajar ada lima, yaitu; 1) teks deskripsi, teks ekposisi, teks argumentasi, teks editorial, dan teks proposal penelitian. Masing-masing teks dijadikan unit pembelajaran. Tiap unit pembelajaran terbagi atas ; 1) tujuan pembelajaran, 20 materi ajar, 3) teks yang dibaca, dan 4) evaluasi pembelajaran. Instrumen penilaian menggunakan rubrik penilaian bahan ajar dengan 4 komponen yakni berskala 1-4. Keempat komponen penilaian meliputi; 1) kelayakan isi dengan rerata nilai 23.00 atau dengan kategori sangat baik , 2) kebahasaan dengan rerata nilai 14.00 dan terkategori baik, 3 ) penyajian dengan rerata 19.30 atau berada pada kategori sangat baik, sedangkan komponen , 4) desain mendapatkan rerata nilai 14.60 dengan kategori baik. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian terhadap bahan ajar hasil pengembangan berada pada angka rerata 17,72 atau berada pada kategori baik.
PENERAPAN STRATEGI REDIFINISI KONSTEKSTUAL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PENGUASAAN KOSAKATA DAN AKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN St. Nurbaya St. Nurbaya
LITERA Vol 10, No 2: LITERA OKTOBER 2011
Publisher : Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/ltr.v10i2.1164

Abstract

applying a contextual learning strategy of redefinition in Indonesian. This was an action research study involving the students of Class VIII E of SMP Negeri I Seyegan, Sleman, Yogyakarta. The data were collected through observations, interviews, documents, and a vocabulary test. The research instruments included an interview guide, a checklist, and observation guide, and a vocabulary test. The data werequalitatively described. The results showed that the contextual redefinition strategy managed to improve the vocabulary mastery and learning activities. The students’ vocabulary mastery improved after each action cycle. The learning activities included raising questions, examining the correspondence between questions andlearning materials, using dictionaries to verify word meanings, having discussions,and constructing sentences to express contextual meanings.