Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review): Journal of Accounting and Business Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen
Sendy Cahyadi
Universitas Ma Chung
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH PROSES EVALUASI KINERJA TERHADAP PERSEPSI PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS: STUDI DI PERGURUAN TINGGI Dian Wijayanti; Sendy Cahyadi
SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review) : Journal of Accounting and Business Vol 3 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Program Studi S1 Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Univesitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (793.709 KB) | DOI: 10.20884/1.sar.2018.3.1.1161

Abstract

This study aims to test the process of performance evaluation particularly the formality and participation may effect the procedural fairness. Research conducted in universities as educational institutions that prioritizes quality of education involving all work units. Survey method was apllied by distributing questionnaires to 70 educational staff. 55 questionnaires were returned and 47 questionnaires were qualified to be analyzed in this study. Regression analysis was applied withing the research to conduct hypothesis testing. The results exposes formalities of performance evaluation effects the perception of procedural fairness, yet participation does not effect the perception of procedural fairness. It may happen since respondents prefer to understand the right instrument in assessing performance in performance evaluation is more important than participation in evaluation. Being aware of the results from the research, the process of performance evaluation requires formalized practical implication in order to obtain fairness evaluation process for everyone in the organization.
Analisis Determinan Kualitas Audit Sendy Cahyadi; Cindy Marcellia Sudjoko
Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen Vol 2, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Jur. Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (477.894 KB)

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to analyze the effect of audit tenure, the size of the Public Accounting Firm, and rotation audit to audit quality. The population of this research is banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2009-2015. The data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The results of this study prove that the variables that affect the audit quality only the size of the Public Accounting Firm, while audit tenure and audit rotation did not significantly affect audit qualityAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan pengaruh masa penugasan audit, ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP), dan rotasi audit terhadap kualitas audit. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2009 hingga tahun 2015. Analisis data menggunakan analisis multivariat dengan regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa variabel yang berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit hanya ukuran KAP, sedangkan masa penugasan audit dan rotasi audit tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit.
PENGARUH PROSES EVALUASI KINERJA TERHADAP PERSEPSI PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS: STUDI DI PERGURUAN TINGGI Dian Wijayanti; Sendy Cahyadi
SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review) : Journal of Accounting and Business Vol 3 No 1 (2018): June 2018
Publisher : Program Studi S1 Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Univesitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (793.709 KB) | DOI: 10.20884/1.sar.2018.3.1.1161

Abstract

This study aims to test the process of performance evaluation particularly the formality and participation may effect the procedural fairness. Research conducted in universities as educational institutions that prioritizes quality of education involving all work units. Survey method was apllied by distributing questionnaires to 70 educational staff. 55 questionnaires were returned and 47 questionnaires were qualified to be analyzed in this study. Regression analysis was applied withing the research to conduct hypothesis testing. The results exposes formalities of performance evaluation effects the perception of procedural fairness, yet participation does not effect the perception of procedural fairness. It may happen since respondents prefer to understand the right instrument in assessing performance in performance evaluation is more important than participation in evaluation. Being aware of the results from the research, the process of performance evaluation requires formalized practical implication in order to obtain fairness evaluation process for everyone in the organization.
Co-Authors Cindy Marcellia Sudjoko Dian Wijayanti