This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax
Cesar Antonio Munthe
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RELEVANSI SANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA DALAM PERPU NO. 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK TERHADAP TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN Cesar Antonio Munthe
Justitia et Pax Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v32i2.1149

Abstract

ABSTRACTTis research was conducted to fnd out the relevance of chemical castration sanctions against the criminal purpose. Tis research used normative method. Te results showed that chemical castration sanctions in Government Regulation No. 1 year 2016 has not met all elements of the criminal purpose. An elements of covered is revenge element and the deterrent element. While protection of the public element and rehabilitation of the criminal is still relatively and needs to be proven deeper.Keywords: Relevance, Chemical Castration, Criminal Purpose.INTISARIPenelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui relevansi sanksi kebiri kimia terhadap tujuan pemidanaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sanksi kebiri kimia dalam Perpu No. 1 Tahun 2016 tidak memenuhi semua unsur tujuan pemidanaan. Unsur yang dipenuhi adalah unsur pembalasan dan unsur menjerakan. Sedangkan unsur Perlindungan terhadap kepentingan umum dan memperbaiki pelaku masih relatif dan perlu dibuktikan lebih dalam.Kata Kunci :Relevansi, Kebiri Kimia, Tujuan Pemidanaan.
THE IMPACT OF PANCASILA AS THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF INDONESIA TOWARD THE PROVISION ON DEATH PENALTY IN THE PENAL CODE BILL Cesar Antonio Munthe; Paulinus Soge
Justitia et Pax Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i1.1629

Abstract

Pancasila has been the state ideology of Indonesia since the day after the independence of Indonesia that is on the 18th of August 1945. It was formulated by our founding fathers by taking our own values and cultures inherited by our ancestors from some old kingdoms  such as Kutai in Kalimantan, Sriwijaya in Sumatra, and Majapahit in Java. One year after the independence  on the 17th of August 1945, Indonesian government promulgated Law No. 1 Year 1946 concerning The Penal Code on 26th  of  February 1946. Through this law the government at that time stated that Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch-Indie  (W.v.S. Ned. Indie (S. 1915 No. 732) as the main written penal code and was formally called  Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) which in Article 10 provides death penalty as the heaviest main punishment. Dealing with that provision there has been a long debate among Indonesian people whether death penalty is in accordance with Pancasila or not. Netherlands as the home base of death penalty dropped it out from its penal code in 1870 because of the strong struggle of human right proponents. In Indonesia a research carried out in 1981/1982 by The Law Faculty of Undip collaborating with the  The Supreme Court  found out that both proponents and opponents of death penalty used Pancasila as “justification”.  In the effort to give respect to both parties  legal drafters of the  Penal Code Bill provide death penalty as “specific punishment” and put it out of the main punishment  in the Penal Code Bill.Key Words: Pancasila, State ideology, Legal drafters, Specific punishment, The Penal Code Bill.