Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bahasa: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Muh. Taufiq
Universitas Negeri Makassar
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Development of Jurisprudence Learning Model Based Debate Materialat Class X SMA Reski Nahal; Muh. Taufiq; Sultan Sultan
Bahasa: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 1, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : ppjbsip

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1359.705 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/bahasa.v1i3.36

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) produce debating teaching materials based on a model of jurisprudence in Wahdah Islamiyah Makassar High School IT; (2) examine the feasibility of debating material teaching materials based on the model of jurisprudence in class X SMA IT Wahdah Islamiyah Makassar. This  research was designed with research and development. The design of this study is R2D2 (Recursive, Reflective Design and Development Model). The data in this study are qualitative and quantitative data from the assessment of experts and practitioners. Qualitative data comes from comments, criticisms, and suggestions from expert and practitioner evaluations of teaching materials. Quantitative data is sourced from scores of expert and practitioner evaluations of the components of teaching materials. The data analysis technique of this study is qualitative data analysis and quantitative data analysis. Qualitative data analysis, namely grouping data and concluding data in the form of comments, suggestions, and criticism from experts and practitioners to improve teaching materials and quantitative data analysis that is looking for the average of each indicator of expert judgment and practitioners for product feasibility. Components of the results of the assessment of teaching materials indicate that the component of content eligibility obtained an average of 3.39, the presentation component of 3.53, the language component of 3.47, the graphic component of 3.64, and the implications for developing competency debating 3.83. This research and development resulted in the product of the Arguing Teaching Material Based on a Model of jurisprudence that had been assessed by experts and practitioners. The results of expert and practitioner evaluations of teaching materials indicate that the assessment is in a very feasible category. 
Co-Authors Reski Nahal Sultan Sultan