Articles
<![CDATA[Rekontruksi Asas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Dalam Gugatan Sengketa Konsumen ]]>
<![CDATA[Tanaya, Velliana]]>
<![CDATA[ Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14421/asy-syir'ah.2013.%x
<![CDATA[In a dispute over consumer protection, the plaintiff in this case is that consumers do not necessarily use the basic claim (posita) with the construction of Tort, but need to be reviewed again is there any legal relationship between consumers and business actors. If there is any relationship between the consumer and an entrepreneur based on contract thus the claim is based on breach of contract and if the consumer complaint using the qualification of tort, then the contractual relationship is not required. It is necessary to reconstruct the lawsuit to avoid an obscuur libel lawsuit which will end up to be niet ontvantkelijkverklaard.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Governing Languange Clause dan Translation Clause pada Perjanjian Berbahasa Asing ]]>
<![CDATA[Tanaya, Velliana]]>;
<![CDATA[Nugroho, Harimurti Adi]]>
<![CDATA[ Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol 2 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia, State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Purwokerto, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (315.118 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v2i1.2387
<![CDATA[Since the enactment of Law No. 24/2009 on Flag, Language, National Emblems and the National Anthem (UU Bahasa), many court decisions arise related to the use of foreign languages (English) in agreements made between Indonesian Citizens or Indonesia Legal Entities with Foreigners or Foreign Legal Entities. One of the most well-known verdicts was the verdict that canceled the loan agreement between PT Bangun Karya Pertama Lestasri and Nine AM for violating Article 31 paragraph (1) UU Bahasa. This article discusses 4 cases that have been resolved by the State Court, the High Court and the Supreme Court where almost all of the decisions cancelled the agreements written in foreign languages. It is effected the businessman to use governing language clauses and translation clauses into foreign language agreements based on freedom of contract and pacta sunt servanda]]>
<![CDATA[PENYULUHAN HUKUM TENTANG HUMAN TRAFFICKING DAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA PADA MASYARAKAT SUMBA ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizky P.P. Karo Karo]]>;
<![CDATA[Dian Parluhutan]]>;
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>
<![CDATA[ SABDAMAS Vol 1 No 1 (2019): SABDAMAS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Unika Atma Jaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (386.645 KB)
<![CDATA[Latar belakang pengabdian kepada masyarakat (PkM) ini adalah sebagai pelaksanaan surat No. 74/V.7h/STT-GKS/IV/2019 tertanggal 2 April 2019 tentang Tindak Lanjut MoU UPH dan Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kristen Sumba (STT GKS). Human Trafficking (HT) dan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) di Sumba sudah sangat meresahkan dan menimbulkan banyak korban. Tujuan PkM ini ialah untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum dan pendampingan hukum kepada masyarakat Sumba pada umumnya dan mahasasiswa/mahasiswi serta dosen di Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kristen Sumba (STT GKS) Lewa khususnya tentang pencegahan HT, KDRT dan upaya, serta partisipasi masyarakat dalam penegakan hukum HT dan KDRT. Metode kegiatan ini adalah penyuluhan dan pendampingan hukum serta pendekatan keragaman manusia (a human diversity). Hasil kegiatan ialah telah terlaksana penyuluhan hukum, pendampingan hukum, sosialisasi, dan edukasi tentang upaya preventif, upaya represif, dan upaya pemulihan kondisi korban. Simpulan kegiatan ialah upaya preventif, upaya represif, dan upaya pemulihan kondisi korban sangat penting untuk dilaksanakan. Upaya preventif penting dilakukan guna mencegah HT dan KDRT. Upaya represif penting dilakukan untuk memberi efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pemulihan penting dilakukan agar korban dapat melangsungkan kehidupannya kembali dan beraktivitas secara normal kembali.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN PEMBATASAN SOSIAL BERSKALA BESAR (PSBB) AKIBAT PANDEMI CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SEBAGAI FORCE MAJEURE DALAM KONTRAK [Implementation of Large-scale Social Restrictions due to Coronavirus Disease-19 (Covid-19) Pandemic as Force Majeure in Contract] ]]>
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Jessica Angeline Zai]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3805
<![CDATA[A contract is an agreement made by the parties in written form. An agreement is a binding agreement between two or more people. This incident resulted in a legal relationship between the parties, which in the agreement included the rights and obligations of each party. In a contract, there is always a force majeure clause, the arrangements are made to protect the debtor when carrying out his obligations there has been an unexpected event beyond his fault. Since the end of 2019 until now the spread of Covid-19 has been very widespread and has had an impact on slowing economic growth, resulting in the fulfillment of contract achievements executed by the parties. This article was made to examine the classification of force majeure in contracts in connection with the widespread spread of Covid-19 which resulted in the contract relationship not going well, but it was not automatically used as an excuse to cancel a contract. The research method used is normative legal research with a legal and conceptual approach. The result of the research is that the force majeure clause can be an attempt to restructure or change the contents of the agreement while taking into account the agreement of the parties through the negotiation process. The concept of force majeure in the context of non-natural disasters as regulated in Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020, which is the discharge of responsibility and the release of fulfillment of one party's achievements for a while or is called relative force majeure. The parties' discretion is needed to carry out business contract negotiations such as rearranging the fulfillment of achievements as stated in the contract.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Sebuah perjanjian adalah persetujuan yang dibuat oleh para pihak dalam bentuk tertulis. Perjanjian tersebut kemudian mengikat dua pihak atau lebih. Hal ini menimbulkan hubungan hukum di antara para pihak, di mana di dalamnya terdapat hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak. Dalam sebuah perjanjian akan selalu ada klausul force majeure, yang ditujukan utnuk melindungi debitur jika pada saat melaksanakan kewajibannya terdapat kejadian di luar kesalahannya. Sejak akhir tahun 2019 hingga sekarang, penyebaran Covid-19 semakin meluas dan berdampak pada kelesuan pertumbuhan ekonomi, dan pemenuhan kewajiban dalam perjanjian oleh para pihak. Artikel ini bertujuan meneliti klasifikasi force majeure dalam kontrak dalam hubungannya dengan penyebaran Covid-19 yang berdampak pada hubungan kontraktual menjadi tidak lancar, namun tidak otomatis membatalkan perjanjian tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ialah klausul force majeure dapat menjadi upaya untuk merestuktur atau mengubah isi perjanjian dengan tetap memperhitungkan kesepakatan para pihak melalui proses negosiasi. Konsep force majeure dalam konteks bencana non-alam yang diatur dalam Keputusan Presiden No. 12 Tahun 2020, melepaskan tanggung jawab pemenuhan perjanjian untuk sementara waktu, atau yang disebut dengan force majeure relatif. Keputusan para pihak dibutuhkan dalam bernegosiasi untuk melangsungkan pemenuhan prestasi yang diatur dalam perjanjian.]]>
<![CDATA[BENTUK KETERLIBATAN PEMEGANG SAHAM DALAM PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG DAPAT MEMPERLUAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABANNYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Review Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.19166/lr.v17i3.834
<![CDATA[Limited Liability Company is the most popular form of business entity in Indonesia because law acknowledges the principle of limited liability of its shareholders, which gives advantages for entrepreneurs running a business. Article 3 Subsection 1 Law No. 40 Year 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company stated that company’s shareholders are not personally liable for agreements made on behalf of the Company and are not liable for the Company’s losses in excess of their prospective shareholding. However, in Article 3 Subsection 2 there are some waivers of the principle, one of the exceptions is if the relevant shareholders are involved in illegal actions committed by the Company. It is interesting because in fact, usually, shareholder do not get involved in company’s management. Through normative research with Statute and Conceptual Approach on Piercing the Corporate Veil, shareholders can be accountable for personal responsibility if shareholders in giving his/her voting rights in General Meeting of Shareholders neglect his/her duty of care, or if besides of being shareholders he/she also become Board of Directors and/or Board of Commissioners who runs the Company’s management, or if the shareholders give order or command to Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners or company’s employee to perform actions that causing the Company committed an unlawful act and harm others (tort). Personal liability can be requested if injured party filing a tort lawsuit and set the relevant shareholders as a defendant besides the Company.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM RAHASIA DAGANG DALAM PERJANJIAN FRANCHISE COCOYO ]]>
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Jessica Vincentia Marpaung]]>;
<![CDATA[Audrea Dindya Djohan]]>
<![CDATA[ Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (236.173 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p237-254
<![CDATA[Food and beverage franchise is one of the thriving businesses in Indonesia. In this industry, one of the most important elements is trade secrets. In practice, all franchises agreements have one or several articles governing the provisions regarding the granting of the trade secrets rights and violations of trade secrets. However, in reality, in the Cocoyo franchise agreement there are no clause regarding its trade secrets so it doesn’t provide legal protection for Cocoyo’s trade secrets. This research uses the normative legal research method in which this study will analyze the forms of legal protection against trade secrets in the Cocoyo franchise agreement. The agreement to protect and disclose Cocoyo’s trade secrets confidential was verbal. Although verbal, its trade secrets are still protected by law.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN THE MISAPPROPRIATION THEORY DALAM PENGATURAN INSIDER TRADING DI INDONESIA (THE APLICATION OF THE MISAPPROPRIATION THEORY IN INSIDER TRADING REGULATION IN INDONESIA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Dicky Winata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 12, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (256.53 KB)
|
DOI: 10.54629/jli.v12i1.372
<![CDATA[Sistem Pasar Modal diatur dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang PasarModal, yang memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada masyarakat, perusahaan, dan pihakterkait lainnya. Terlepas dari hukum, beberapa orang atau pihak mencoba mendapatkankeuntungan yang lebih besar dengan menggunakan akses yang mereka miliki untuk mencariinformasi terkait perdagangan dalam pasar modal dan menggunakannya untuk membeli ataumenjual saham perusahaan (yang aksesnya mereka miliki) sebelum penjualan atau pembelianitu diumumkan kepada masyarakat. Aksi semacam itu disebut insider trading dan kebiasaantersebut menyebabkan ketidaknyamanan di antara para penanam modal. Di Amerika Serikat,teori Misaproppriation digunakan untuk menentukan insider trading. Cakupan teori ini dapatbermanfaat jika diterapkan dalam pengaturan hukum mengenai pasar modal kita, sehinggapara “insider” dapat ditangkap.]]>
<![CDATA[OPTIK GENDER DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA KEKERASAN FISIK DALAM RUMAH TANGGA ]]>
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Yudisial Vol 4, No 1 (2011): INDEPENDENSI DAN RASIONALITAS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Komisi Yudisial RI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29123/jy.v4i1.205
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTDomestic violence is such a lot happened phenomenon that it has become quantitatively an object in a court case after the enactment of Act Number 23 year 2004. One important aspect associated with this criminal act is that the victims are almost entirely women, by and large in a position as a wife. Analysis of the decision of District Court of Tangerang does not only highlight on the provision of formal and material aspects of the criminal law, but also consider the perspective of gender equality, which should be put as an initial point for the legal reasoning of the panel of judges.Key words: domestic violence, gender equality, victim ABSTRAKLonjakan perkara Kekerasan rumah tangga di pengadilan meningkat tajam semenjak pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Salah satu aspek yang penting dalam terkait dengan tindak pidana adalah korban selalu di pihak perempuan, dan kebanyakan mereka sebagai isteri. Terkait hal itu, analisa dalam putusan dari Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang tidak hanya mengedepankan ketentuan formal dan materiil dalam hukum pidana sebagai permulaan alasan hukum oleh majelis hakim, namun juga mempertimbankan pandangan kesamaan gender. Kata kunci: kekerasan rumah tangga, persamaan gender, korban. ]]>
<![CDATA[PENILAIAN EFISIENSI EKONOMI DALAM PENYUSUNAN LANGKAH STRATEGIS TERHADAP REGULASI ]]>
<![CDATA[Fajar Sugianto]]>;
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Veronica Putri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 10, No 3 (2021): Desember 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (517.306 KB)
|
DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i3.694
<![CDATA[Salah satu teori terpenting dalam economic analysis of law yang menjadi dasar pengkonstruksian kerangka analisisnya ialah efisiensi ekonomi. Konsep tersebut tidak sederhana, dan oleh banyak ahli dikembangkan melalui konsepsi yang bervariasi yang kesemuanya dapat digunakan untuk memperkuat pemahaman yang tepat. Dari perspektif hukum dan ekonomi, setiap regulasi adalah pengaturan ekonomi. Dapat dikatakan efisien jika tidak ada pengaturan alternatif lainnya yang dapat membuat individu menjadi lebih baik sesuai dengan preferensi mereka sendiri. Ini tidak berarti semua regulasi yang telah diberlakukan tidak efisien. Untuk perluasan perspektif, konsep efisiensi dalam tulisan ini diperluas dengan memahami konsep strategi yang dilihat konsistensi praktik hukum. Gagasan dasar tentang strategi menunjukkan bahwa regulasi membutuhkan strategi yang tepat sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan. Penilaian efisiensi yang diberikan: pertama, bagaimana orang akan bereaksi terhadap pemberlakuan regulasi dan menggunakannya sebagai alat pengaturan diri mereka sendiri, dan kedua, kebutuhan mengembangkannya sebagai dasar keputusan dalam penyusunan regulasi yang baik dan tetap sasaran.]]>
<![CDATA[LAND GRABBING AS UNLAWFUL ACT ]]>
<![CDATA[Catherine Susantio]]>;
<![CDATA[Velliana Tanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Cassey Regina Salamintargo]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Review Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i1.5100
<![CDATA[Land cases in Indonesia are one of the most common types of cases in Indonesia. The forms of land cases that often arise are related to land grabbing, namely illegal taking of land belonging to other party. An example of a land grabbing case can be seen in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1071 K/PDT/2020 where the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of a piece of land with property rights in Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, Jambi Province as proven by the Certificate of Ownership, but then Defendant I came to take the land belonging to the Plaintiff by constructing a building on the land without a permit and refusing to move even though it has been given a warning, so that the Plaintiff feels aggrieved. Therefore, the author intends to find out how an act can be classified as against the law and what kind of compensation arrangements are in accordance with applicable regulations. The research method used is normative legal research method and the approach used is law approach and case approach. The results showed that land grabbing done by Defendant I could be classified as an act against the law because all the elements had been fulfilled; while related to losses due to unlawful acts in the form of land grabbing, the most appropriate compensation is the return of the Plaintiff’s condition to its original state.]]>
