Zusiana Elly Triantini
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Jogyakarta

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

INTEGRASI HUKUM PAJAK DAN ZAKAT DI INDONESIA - Telaah terhadap Pemikiran Masdar Farid Mas’udi Triantini, Zusiana Elly
AL-AHKAM Volume 23, Nomor 2, Oktober 2013
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Abstract

Masdar Farid Mas’udi terkenal sebagai ulama ekletik yang menghasilkan ijtihad-ijtihad syar’i yang banyak menjadi bahan perbincangan di kalangan pemikir Islam di Indonesia. Wacana integrasi zakat dan pajak memang bukan hal baru, namun secara substansial pemikirannya dapat dijadikan sebagai pertimbangan terhadap kebijakan-kebijakan zakat dan pajak di Indonesia, bahkan menjadi pencerahan pemahaman Islam substansial di Indonesia. Pemikirannya untuk mengintegrasikan zakat dan pajak menimbulkan kontroversi dan pertanyaan yang cukup beragam, bahkan terkesan ganjil karena seolah menyatukan dua hal yang secara substansi dan kegunaannya berbeda. Namun, jika memahami pemikiran Masdar secara menyeluruh baik dari sisi materi maupun metode ijtihadnya, akan terlihat bahwa sejatinya pemikiran Masdar tentang integrasi penyatuan pajak dan zakat secara substansial, dapat menjadi solusi problem pelaksanaan zakat dan pajak bagi umat Islam di Indonesia. Selanjutnya tulisan ini akan memaparkan pemikiran, metode dan formulasi konsep zakat dan pajak Masdar Farid Mas’udi.***Masdar Farid Masudi is famous as an eclectic scholar who produces Islamic thought (ijtihad), which is becomes a subject of conversation among thinkers of Islam in Indonesia. The discourse of zakat and tax integration actually is not something new, but substantially, his thoughts can be used as a consideration of zakat and tax policies in Indonesia, and even become enlightened understanding of Islamic substance in Indonesia. His thoughts on integration of zakat and tax caused controversy and quite diverse questions. This even seems “strange” because he wanted to unite two things that are different substantially and usefulness. However, if we understand his thought more comprehensively  both its content and his method of ijtihad, it would seem that his real thinking about tax and zakat unification substantially, can be a problem solution of zakat and tax implementation for Muslims in Indonesia. This paper will present ideas, methods and the formulations of zakat and tax’s concept of Masdar Farid Masudi.***Keywords: zakat, pajak, maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, manajemen zakat
INTEGRASI HUKUM PAJAK DAN ZAKAT DI INDONESIA Telaah terhadap Pemikiran Masdar Farid Mas’udi Triantini, Zusiana Elly
Al-Ahkam Volume 23, Nomor 2, Oktober, 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.722 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2013.23.2.22

Abstract

Masdar Farid Mas'udi is famous as an eclectic scholar who produces Islamic thought (ijtihad), which is becomes a subject of conversation among thinkers of Islam in Indonesia. The discourse of zakat and tax integration actually is not something new, but substantially, his thoughts can be used as a consideration of zakat and tax policies in Indonesia, and even become enlightened understanding of Islamic substance in Indonesia. His thoughts on integration of zakat and tax caused controversy and quite diverse questions. This even seems “strange” because he wanted to unite two things that are different substantially and usefulness. However, if we understand his thought more comprehensively both its content and his method of ijtihad, it would seem that his real thinking about tax and zakat unification substantially, can be a problem solution of zakat and tax implementation for Muslims in Indonesia. This paper will present ideas, methods and the formulations of zakat and tax’s concept of Masdar Farid Mas'udi.
Use of Charitable Alms (Zakat) by Incumbent Candidates in Regional Elections in Indonesia (Two Case Studies) Triantini, Zusiana Elly; Masnun, Masnun
PCD Journal Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Post-Clientelistics Elections
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (173.223 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/pcd.31791

Abstract

This article seeks to expose incumbents' tendencies and strategies in using charitable alms (zakat) in regional elections in two areas. Strategies identified include determining binding regulations regarding the use of zakat money, as well as the positioning of persons considered loyal and strategic to incumbents within the leadership structures of zakat institutions. Meanwhile, incumbents worked to integrate and interconnect government programmes with local zakat distribution agencies and attracting public sympathies through the sharing of zakat funds. Incumbents benefit from their power and legitimacy, and can thus easily use zakat funds as an economic resource for gathering the support of zakat recipients (mustahiq[1]). With their power and legitimacy, incumbents are able to claim credit and thus enjoy greater popularity in their re-election campaigns. This power and legitimacy, as well as its benefits, are managed strategically and intelligently to avoid giving the impression of illegality and ease social acceptance. The findings of this research are opposite to those of Samantha May; where May has found that state dominance and control of zakat has met widespread resistance, this research has found that state dominance and control of zakat has not only been well-received by society, but has also had implications for politicians' role in zakat management and distribution. This research, conducted through observation and interviews with zakat distributors/recipients, indicates how clientelism is formed through the government zakat distribution agency (Badan Amil Zakat, 'Zakat Distribution Agency'), the structural/instrumental approaches used by incumbents, and the response of zakat recipients. This article takes two elections in two regions as case studies: Kulon Progo in the 2017 regional election and Magelang Regency in the 2013 regional election.
Revivalisme Islam Versus Keadilan Gender Triantini, Zusiana Elly
Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 (2010)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2010.92.201-218

Abstract

Gender as a subject itself has been around for quite some time in Indonesia, as has the fight for it by government and non-government organizations. Why is it then, that many victimized women still find themselves devoid of rights? Many contemporary views have cast the topic of gender equality as a virus to Indonesian women, especially Muslim women. So why does the fight for gender equality seem stagnant? It seems that for Indonesia, such a cause is mired in by many obstacles. The great wall of patriarchic culture and such defaming claims by 'Islamic' revivalist movements such as HTI, MMI or KPPSI have long lives indeed. Helped along by the comfortable armchair position of men, firmly entrenched in society and backed up by a headstrong dogmatic position on religious interpretation. Sadly, many women still nod to such a position, accepting it as one of the facts of life. Such phenomenon has driven the writer to realize that the struggle for gender equality is far from over. And that a mapping out and elaboration on the extent of challenges facing it would be most beneficial to those fighting for it. In hopes that it would help them in designing proper strategies to more effectively campaign for equality.