Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Psyche 165 Journal
Khrisna Sanubari Limbong
Universitas Prima Indonesia
Education Library & Information Science Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbedaan Adversity Quotient ditinjau dari Coping Stress dan Self Efficacy Diny Atrizka; Kevin Sanjaya; Dea Vanthera; Wulandari Wulandari; Khrisna Sanubari Limbong; Rizky Yusfasari
Psyche 165 Journal Vol. 13 (2020) No. 2
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.653 KB) | DOI: 10.35134/jpsy165.v13i2.89

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the difference adversity quotient in terms of coping stress and self-efficacy of tenth grade students in SMA Swasta Medan. The population of this study was all of the students of tenth grade in SMA Swasta Medan. The subjects used in this study were 146 students who were selected using the disproportionate stratified random sampling method. This study was a comparative quantitative, data collected used Likert Scale which is adversity quotient (AQ), coping stress (CS), and self-efficacy (SE) scale. In this study the data analysis technique used is analysis of varians (ANOVA). The assumptions test consisted of an normality test, a homogenity test, and a hypothesis test.The result of data analysis showed a significant difference adversity quotient in terms of coping stress with Sig .000 < p = .05 and a significant difference adversity quotient in terms of self-efficacy with Sig .000 < p = .05 that owned by the students. The conclusion obtained from this study is a proven hypothesis, namely the difference between adversity quotient (AQ) in terms of coping stress (CS) and adversity quotient (AQ) in terms of self-efficacy (SE), where the contribution percentage of coping stress (CS) in influencing adversity quotient (AQ) was 16.6% and self-efficacy (SE) in influencing adversity quotient (AQ) was 19.5%, the rest was developed by other factors that were not appropriate by the researcher.
Co-Authors Atrizka, diny Dea Vanthera Kevin Sanjaya Rizky Yusfasari Wulandari Wulandari