Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mawarid Jurnal Hukum Islam PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Jurnal Konstitusi
Nurhidayatuloh Nurhidayatuloh
(Scopus ID: 57211560728) Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi

 1 
Anomali Asas Non-Retroaktif dalam Kejahatan Genosida, Bertentangan dengan HAM? Nurhidayatuloh Nurhidayatuloh; Akhmad Idris; Rizka Nurliyantika; Fatimatuz Zuhro
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1923

Abstract

The crime of genocide is one of the most serious international crimes stipulated in the Rome Statute. Previously, genocide was regulated in the Convention on Genocide entered into force on 12 January 1951. The convention and the Rome Statute do not allow retroactivity. However, retroactivity appears in the Indonesian Law on the Human Rights Court and is strengthened through the Indonesian Constitutional Court's Decision. This study focuses on the neglect of the non-retroactive principle in the Law on Human Rights Courts and the extent to which the retroactive period. This research uses normative-legal method with a statutory and case approaches. The result shows that ignoring the non-retoactive principle is contrary to international law and international human rights regulations. Hence, the Constitutional Court's decision that strengthens retroactivity can be interpreted that the Court maintains human rights while at the same time violates human rights by not accurately interpreting the word “derogation” and “restriction” in Article 28J of the 1945 Constitution.
Dilema Pengujian Undang-Undang Ratifikasi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Konteks Ketetanegaraan RI Nurhidayatuloh Nurhidayatuloh
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (319.669 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk915

Abstract

Constitutional Court is an  state  institution  given  with  the  authority,  by  the constitution, to review act toward constitution, UUD 1945, in the first    and final level of which the decision has binding power. The existence of ratification act becomes a problem to the constitutional enforcement system  in Indonesia. Goverment’s binding to the international conventions/agreements are given on the grounds of ratification by The House of Representatives and the President in the form of act. This is because Indonesia recognizes intenational laws after the adoption of the international coventions/agreements. This “special adoption” regarding international coventions/agreements are formed by national law with the same level as the act. Because of taking the form of an act, it is then becomes a problem whether this ratification act can be categorized in the hierarchy of laws based on Law No. 12 Year 2011 and thus can be judicially reviewed by the Constitutional Court.
Co-Authors Abunawar Basyeban Achmad Romsan Adrian Nugraha Agus Ngadino Akhmad Idris Annisa Fitri Arum Apriandi, Mada Faiq Tobroni Farida Ali Fatimatuz Zuhro Fatimatuz Zuhro Febrian Febrian Leni Marlina Nyimas Olivia Rd. Muhammad Ikhsan Rizka Nurliyantika Suzanna Mohamed Isa Yoshua Alexander