Garuda Wiko
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

KETIKA TERMOHON MENOLAK TERLIBAT DALAM PERSIDANGAN ARBITRASE Wiko, Garuda
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, JULY 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Tanjungpura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v3i2.37514

Abstract

Although arbitration has been made based on the agreement of the parties and stated in writing in the Main Contract, this does not guarantee that the parties will immediately be willing to participate in the arbitration process when a dispute occurs. It is possible that one of the arbitration parties was absent and was not willing to be involved in the trial process. In very rare circumstances, the arbitration applicant may cancel / deny his participation in the trial process. This article will describe the regulations, practices and expert views in the implementation of the arbitration proceedings without the presence of the respondent. It is expected that from this research, an overview will be obtained in carrying out the arbitration proceedings without the applicant. The findings obtained are that there are no extensive guidelines in Indonesia that can be used as a guide by the arbitrators in carrying out such a trial process, especially related to proof and examination of cases. Some of the principles and regulations set out in the Civil Procedure Code may be adopted to answer some things that are not regulated in the arbitration legal framework in Indonesia. Efforts should be made to develop a guideline framework for arbitrators so that there are similarities and quality assurance of decisions made in the trial process without the presence of the respondent.Meskipun arbitrase telah dibuat berdasarkan kesepakatan para pihak dan dicantumkan secara tertulis di dalam Kontrak Utamanya, hal ini tidak menjamin bahwa para pihak akan serta merta bersedia untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses arbitrase ketika suatu sengketa terjadi. Ada kemungkinan salah satu pihak arbitrase mangkir dan tidak bersedia terlibat dalam proses persidangan. Dalam kondisi yang sangat jarang, termohon arbitrase dapat membatalkan/mengingkari keikutsertaannya dalam proses persidangan. Artikel ini akan mendeskripsikan regulasi, praktik dan pandangan ahli dalam pelaksanaan proses persidangan arbitrase yang dilakukan tanpa kehadiran termohon. Diharapkan dari penulisan ini didapatkan gambaran terkait proses persidangan arbitrase tanpa pihak termohon. Penemuan yang didapat adalah belum ada pedoman yang ekstensif di Indonesia yang dapat dijadikan pedoman oleh arbiter dalam menjalankan proses persidangan seperti itu terutama terkait dengan pembuktian dan pemeriksaan perkara. Beberapa prinsip dan peraturan yang diatur dalam Hukum Acara Perdata mungkin dapat diadopsi untuk menjawab beberapa hal yang tidak diatur di dalam kerangka hukum arbitrase di Indonesia. Perlu adanya upaya untuk mengembangkan suatu kerangka pedoman bagi para arbiter agar terdapat kesamaan dan penjaminan kualitas terhadap putusan-putusan yang dibuat dalam proses persidangan tanpa kehadiran termohon.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis dalam Kerangka Belt and Road Initiative Wiko, Garuda; Kinanti, Fatma Muthia
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 16, No 2 (2021): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.30347

Abstract

Inisiatif kejasama internasional yang diinisiasi oleh Negara Cina yang disebut Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) dikembangkan untuk mewujudkan integrasi ekonomi wilayah Eurasia. Kerjasama ini pada akhirnya memunculkan hubungan hukum yang kompleks antara berbagai entitas baik pada tataran publik maupun privat. Dalam taraf privat, kerjasama maupun proyek yang melibatkan pihak yang berasal dari berbagai kewarganegaraan serta bidang sengketa yang beragam dalam kerangka BRI akan memberikan permasalahan tersendiri. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji aspek penyelesaian sengketa khusus dalam bidang bisnis pada kerangka BRI. Mengingat luasnya ruang lingkup permasalahan hukum yang terkait dengan BRI maka pembahasan akan dibatasi agar lebih fokus yakni menganalisa kerjasama BRI dari konteks penyelesaian sengketa. Ditemukan terdapat beberapa pilihan penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat dipilih oleh para pihak yang terlibat dalam Proyek BRI yakni Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa yang bersifat non-adjudikatif seperti negosiasi maupun mediasi, pengadilan nasional, China’s International Commercial Courts (CICC), forum arbitrase nasional, arbitrase internasional. Indonesia merupakan negara mitra yang penting dalam implementasi BRI. Untuk itu, Indonesia perlu memperhatikan sumber hukum internasional yang mendukung proses penyelesaian sengketa yang bersifat transnasional.   International cooperation initiated by China called the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was developed to realize economic integration from Eurasia. The implementation of this initiative includes cooperation in strategic areas that are very comprehensive. This cooperation ultimately gave rise to complex legal relationships between various entities at both the public and private levels. At the private level, collaborations and projects involving parties of various nationalities as well as various dispute areas within the BRI framework will present significant issues. This article aims to examine aspects of dispute resolution specific to the business sector under the BRI framework. It was found that there are several dispute resolution options that can be chosen by the parties involved in the BRI Project, namely non-adjudicative alternative forms of dispute resolution such as negotiation or mediation, national courts, China's International Commercial Courts (CICC), national arbitration forums, international arbitration. Indonesia is an important partner country in the implementation of BRI. For this reason, Indonesia needs to pay attention to international legal sources that support transnational dispute resolution processes.
Eksistensi Pemikiran Rasionalitas Formal: Refleksi Tentang Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Garuda Wiko
Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA Vol. 24 No. 4 (2006)
Publisher : Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (10269.305 KB)

Abstract

Eksistensi Pemikiran Rasionalitas Formal: Refleksi Tentang Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia
Legality Aspect Of Conducting Documents Only Arbitration In Indonesia Garuda Wiko; Fatma Muthia Kinanti
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 NO. 2 jULY 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.884 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v3i2.9914

Abstract

Documents-Only Arbitration (DOA) is a type of arbitration that is carried out entirely by written documents-only. DOA is beneficial when the burden and substance of the dispute are relatively simple and when there are obstacles to conduct a face-to-face proceeding (instance in the Covid-19 Pandemic or limitation of cost). This study examined the DOA trial method and how it is based on Law No. 30 Year1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution as the lex arbitri in Indonesia. Regulations, Rules, and Procedures from arbitration institutions, both national and international are also studied to better understand the problem. This study aimed to explain the legality of arbitration based on Documents-Only Arbitration in Indonesia. This study concluded that the conduct of DOA is very possible to be implemented in Indonesia and does not conflict with Law No. 30 Year 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Arbitration Law).
ELIMINATION OF NON-TARIFF BARRIERS OF TRADE IN GOODS IN THE ASEAN REGION: WILL IT EVER WORK? Wiko, Garuda; Kinanti, Fatma Muthia
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Within the framework of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), there is a mandate to promote trade liberalization with the aim of increasing intra-ASEAN trade. The realization of the AEC includes the existence of the free flow of goods, services and investments within the ASEAN region. In terms of trade in goods, the regulations within the AEC framework are intended to promote the establishment of single markets and production bases in the ASEAN region that does not only require the elimination of tariff barriers, but also non-tariff barriers.This article concludethat the NTB Regulations in the AEC 2015 are not very well implemented proven by the increase amount of NTMs imposed by ASEAN countries. It was found that several initiatives have been formulated in the AEC Blueprint 2025 in order to further eliminate non-tarrif barriers.