Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Analysis and Development of KEBI 1.0 Checker Framework as an Application of Indonesian Spelling Error Detection Tresna Maulana Fahrudin; Ilmatus Sa'diyah; Latipah; Ibnu Zahy Atha Illah; Cagiva Chaedar Beylirna; Burhan Syarif Acarya
Internasional Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Anaylitics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Analytics Vol 1, No 2,
Publisher : International Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Analytics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (859.955 KB) | DOI: 10.33005/ijdasea.v1i2.9

Abstract

At educational institutions, especially at University, writing scientific papers is a skill that must be possessed by academics such as educators and students. However, writing scientific papers is not easy, there are many provisions and rules that need to be fulfilled. Several studies show that there are still many academics who make mistakes in writing their scientific papers. Some of the mistakes made include punctuation errors, typographic writing errors and the use of non-standard words in Indonesian. Researchers in Indonesia have developed various spelling error detection applications in Indonesian-language scientific papers. This study tries to analyze the development of an application framework for detecting Indonesian spelling errors from various assessment indicators. This study tries to compare the application framework for detecting spelling errors between other studies with proposed application that named KEBI 1.0 Checker. KEBI 1.0 Checker as a spelling error detection application has 3 main features, namely detecting errors in the use of punctuation marks, writing typography, and using non-standard words in accordance with the standards of the Big Indonesian Dictionary and the General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling. In addition, this study tries to objectively examine the complexity of the features, advantages and disadvantages, methods and the level of accuracy of each application. The results of the analysis show that KEBI 1.0 Checker has the completeness of features, fast computation time, easy application access, and an attractive user interface. However, it is still necessary to improve the precision in correcting spelling errors in typographic words.