Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei
Jonny Simamora
Universitas Bengkulu
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
THE COMPLIANCE LEVEL OF OFFICIALS FOR STAFF DEVELOPMENT IN LAW ENFORCEMENT OF STATE CIVIL APPARATUS DISCIPLINE AT THE GOVERNMENT OF BENGKULU PROVINCE Agung Praja Putra; Iskandar Iskandar; Jonny Simamora
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2019): November 2019
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (233.956 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/j_bengkoelenjust.v9i2.9976

Abstract

Government of Bengkulu Province is strongly committed to improve the quality of the bureaucratic reform of Apparatus Resourcesparticularly apparatus resources reform at the environment of Local Government of Bengkulu Province. Based on Attachment 1 of Regulation of the Head of the Civil Service Agency No. 21 of 2010 concerning the Implementing Regulations of Government Regulation No. 53 of 2010 on Discipline of Civil Servants, it is known that the employee dismissal procedures that violate discipline begins by calling the concerned continued with the establishment of inspection team. The results of the examination if proven to do violation, then the competent authorities impose disciplinary punishment. There have been many advances experienced by the government in the field of employment, which previously civil servants performance was rated based on patronage system where the presentation and work are preferred switched to merit systemin which the competence and performance of employees are preferred. However, there are still some violations occurred both violations of discipline and criminal.
BENCHMARK FOR DETERMINATION OF FORCED MONEY IN EXECUTION OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENT Muhammad Ali; Ardilafiza Ardilafiza; Jonny Simamora
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.566 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/j_bengkoelenjust.v10i1.11353

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study about Benchmark Determination of the Administrative Court Decision Execution Forced In. Research methods used in this thesis is a research type normative and descriptive analytical research specifications, and approaches used, namely, the approach Law and approach cases. From the research we concluded that since when the claimant may apply for money of enforced at the time of the initial filing a lawsuit to the Administrative Court, for their money forced / Dwangsom in a decision of the State Administrative Court, it is motivated by a petition of Plaintiff in the lawsuit to beg loading money forced / Dwangsom Defendant if lost and wayward implement administrative court ruling, benchmark application is the amount of money forced the ruling stating Plaintiff granted, judgment and decision condemnatoir who has obtained permanent legal force. Because implementing administrative court ruling is always Agency / Administrative Officers are still active, more effective and efficient if the imposition of forced currency / dwangsom taken / deducted from salaries / allowances officials concerned each month. So it is not charged to the State finances forced money order imposing sanctions / dwangsom and administratively feasible, must be followed by concrete implementing regulations relating to money forced / dwangsom to sync with the Administrative Court Act and the Law on Government Administration.
MEASUREMENT OF THE QUALITY OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE DECISIONS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS Adhi Wirawan Mulyono; Jonny Simamora; Edra Satmaidi
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v12i2.25033

Abstract

The quality of the decisions handed down by judges can be seen from the ratio decidendi or legal arguments given by the judges themselves. Before the judge decides to answer the plaintiff's demands, the judge first makes the basics of legal considerations containing legal arguments or reasons to arrive at a decision finally. Article 109 paragraph (1) of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court stipulates that one thing that must be included in a judge's decision is the legal reason that forms the basis of the decision. The method used in this research is the empirical legal research method. This study used primary data and secondary data. The data obtained were analyzed juridical qualitatively utilizing deductive-inductive thinking. The decision has carried out the breadth of proof, the burden of proof, and the assessment of evidence, and the judge has assessed all evidence based on Article 109 of Law Number 5 of 1986 and supported by two pieces of evidence based on Article 107 of Law Number 5 of 1986, the reasons for the judge's refusal and accept the arguments of the plaintiff and the defendant is because the legal remedies do not carry out the decision. The application of Article 107 of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court was then implemented into Article 109 paragraph 1 point d of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court must be carried out in the context of creating a quality State Administrative Court decision.
LEGALITY OF FINANCIAL RIGHTS OF STATE ADMINISTRATORS SUSPECTED OF CORRUPTION: CAN IT BE QUALIFIED AS AN UNLAWFUL ACT? Sherly Mevitasari; Jonny Simamora; Herlambang Herlambang
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): April 2023
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v13i1.27800

Abstract

In carrying out the government system, Law Number 28 of 1999 concerning Good and Clean State Administrators was formed from Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism which regulates the rights, obligations, prohibitions, and sanctions for state administrators. The consequence of the principle of legality is that in the criminal justice process, the presumption of innocence is imposed until a decision is made. This principle is widely used by state administrators who stumble on corruption to resign when they are named suspects so that they are entitled to pension rights. Therefore, this research aims to describe and analyze the financial rights of state administrators who are suspected of corruption. The method used in this research was descriptive with a normative juridical research design. The legal materials used in this research included primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Analyzed using the deductive logic analysis method by interpreting and discussing research result materials based on the definition of law, legal rule, legal theory, and doctrine related to the problem being studied. The results of the data analysis inferred that law enforcement against corruption cases was still not optimal. The law enforcers only looked at criminal offenses committed without looking more broadly at the elements of criminal acts such as locus delicti and tempus delicti so that they could find out the impact and actions of other related criminal acts. Keywords:   Legality   Principles,   State   Administrators,   State   Financial   Losses/State Economy, Corruption.
PELAKSANAAN PEMUNGUTAN PAJAK SARANG BURUNG WALET DI KABUPATEN KAUR Mayolla Octavia; Jonny Simamora; Wulandari Wulandari
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 21 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkutei.v21i2.24795

Abstract

Salah satu sumber Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Kabupaten Kaur adalah pemungutan terhadap Pajak Sarang Burung Walet yang diatur berdasarkan  Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kaur Nomor 03 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pajak Sarang Burung Walet sebagai pedoman dalam pelaksanaan pemungutan Pajak Sarang Burung Walet. Dalam pelaksanaannya, pemungutan  Pajak Sarang Burung Walet belum berjalan dengan baik terlihat dari belum pernah terpenuhinya target pajak sarang burung walet setiap tahunnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kondisi umum Pajak Daerah Kabupaten Kaur, pelaksanaan dan hambatan serta upaya yang dilakukan terhadap pelaksanaan Pemungutan Pajak Sarang Burung Walet di Kabupaten Kaur. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian yuridis-empiris dan pendekatan non doktrinal. Yang mana hasil penelitian ini diperoleh dari observasi dan wawancara secara langsung kepada Kabid pendapatan BPKAD, Kepala KP2KP, dan 8 (delapan) orang Wajib Pajak.  Dari hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pemungutan Pajak Sarang Burung Walet di Kabupaten Kaur belum terlaksana dengan baik yang disebabkan karena beberapa hambatan diantaranya belum maksimal dalam pengkajian dan pendataan oleh pemerintah daerah, kurangnya kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Kurangnya  pengadaan pejabat fungsional tertentu, Kurangnya informasi dan sosialisasi terhadap kebijakan-kebijakan pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah, lemahnya pengawasan, dan tidak adanya sanksi yang tegas dan jelas bagi pelanggar.   Kata Kunci : Pajak Daerah, Sarang Burung Walet, Hambatan.
Co-Authors Adhi Wirawan Mulyono Agung Praja Putra Ardilafiza Ardilafiza Edra Satmaidi Herlambang Herlambang Iskandar Iskandar Mayolla Octavia Muhammad Ali Sherly Mevitasari Wulandari Wulandari