Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENDAMPINGAN MASYARAKAT DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KESADARAN HUKUM TENTANG HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH MELALUI SISTEM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DI DESA ANDAMAN KECAMATAN ANJIR PASAR KABUPATEN BARITO KUALA Hanafi; Nahdhah; Muhammad Syahrial Fitri
Jurnal Pengabdian Sumber Daya Manusia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): EDISI OKTOBER 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (560.326 KB)

Abstract

The development is getting more advanced, placing land in an important aspect in society which is increasingly dynamic as it is today, so that legal certainty is an important factor. We will get the terms of ownership if we register a plot of land in question with the government. There are several ways of registering land that we can take, namely, "systematic registration" and "sporadically". Systematic land registration is based on a work plan and is carried out in areas stipulated by the minister, while sporadically is carried out at the request of interested parties. Due to the lack of community legal awareness regarding the importance of land ownership through the land registration system in Andaman Village, Anjir Pasar Subdistrict, Barito Kuala Regency, it can be seen from the data we collect that only a few people have proof of land ownership in the form of certificate or just a seal. Various factors caused him to be less aware of this, including the problem of costs that must be incurred during the management process and also the perception that the bureaucratic process at BPN is difficult. The purpose of this service is to provide assistance to the community in order to increase the understanding and legal awareness of the Andaman Village community of their land rights through the land registration system, so that the land they own gets legal certainty and can be used as a legal basis when a land dispute occurs. In addition, with this assistance, the Andaman Village apparatus, through its government apparatus, can form a special work unit to receive reports from the community who wish to register their land and make an inventory of lands that have not been registered in the certificate of ownership together with the Extension Team in this community service program. This certainly made it very easy for BPN to conduct field surveys as well as to obtain data on the “free certificate” program which is currently being carried out by the government. Apart from being able to be used as a clear legal basis when a dispute occurs, the existence of a certificate can be used as a loan guarantee in the financial sector, this will certainly bring the productivity value of the people in Andaman Village, where the majority of the population is farming, such as buying fertilizers, agricultural tools, even for increase their agricultural land. This of course also has an impact on increasing the income and welfare of the farming community.
IMPLIKASI YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERKARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016 Hanafi Hanafi; Muhammad Syahrial Fitri
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (764.772 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v12i1.2639

Abstract

Hal yang menjadi tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah, pertama untuk menganalisis kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik dalam sistem pembuktian perkara pidana di Indonesia, kedua untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis kedudukan alat bukti elektronik pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/ 2016 dalam perkara pidana di Indonesia.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang meneliti dan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan penggunaan alat bukti elektronik dalam sistem pembuktian perkara pidana di Indonesia, juga putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/ 2016 yang menjadi dasar pijakan dalam melakukan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pertama, keberadaan alat bukti elektronik / dokumen elektronik memiliki peran penting dalam pembuktian suatu perkara pidana, namun harus memperhatikan tiga aspek yaitu terkait dengan keasliannya (originalitas), terkait dengan isinya (substansi), dan terkait dengan alat bukti lain yang dapat memperkuat alat bukti elektronik tersebut. Kedua, Implikasi yuridis kedudukan alat bukti elektronik pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 dalam perkara pidana di Indonesia adalah bahwa semua alat bukti elektronik / dokumen elektronik tidak dapat dijadikan alat bukti jika tidak dilakukan dalam rangka penegakan hukum.
EKSISTENSI PERSIDANGAN ONLINE DITENGAH PANDEMI COVID19 DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DI INDONESIA Hanafi Hanafi; Muhammad Syahrial Fitri; Fathan Ansori
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v13i2.4493

Abstract

Following the background, the problems in this study are, first, the mechanism for implementing procedural law in E-Court for criminal cases in Indonesia, secondly how E-Court accommodates the process of proof in criminal cases in Indonesia. The method used in this research is pure legal research, which refers to and bases on legal norms and principles, applicable laws and regulations, legal theories and doctrines, jurisprudence, and other literature that are relevant to the topic. The results of this study are, firstly, the mechanism for implementing E-Court procedural law is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation 4/2020 on the Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Electronic Courts provides 2 (two) alternatives for conducting trials in criminal cases, namely Normal Courts and Electronic Courts. Such matters are not previously regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code or other procedural regulations. Second, concerning the process of proofing evidence in criminal cases in E-Court still follows the provisions of the normal criminal procedure law and has the same value or power of evidence as normal trials.