Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Peratun Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Pancasila and Law Review
Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Population and Civil Registration Service of Bandar Lampung City’s Digital Bureaucratic System in Realizing an Effective and Efficient Government Sondika Ragani; Adrian E. Rompis; Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Pancasila and Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (704.783 KB) | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v2i2.2448

Abstract

Nowadays, technological developments cannot be avoided. Technological developments in this era are to facilitate every human activity. The development of technology today is marked by the number of applications that can facilitate the community's affairs. An example is the application of the Community Online Service from the Population and Civil Registry Office of Bandar Lampung City called Pelayanan Online Masyarakat Duduk Manis (Permen Manis). This application is expected to help community services to help manage population documents and realize an effective and efficient government. The problem identified is the application of digital bureaucracy in the Population and Civil Registration Office, or Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil (Disdukcapil) of Bandar Lampung City realizes an effective and efficient government? The research uses normative legal research by collecting and analyzing secondary data. by looking to the public's comments, especially on Permen Manis application users in Bandar Lampung’s Civil Registry Office. By this article the researcher hope the government in Bandar Lampung could improve the services towards the people in Bandar Lampung.
PENUNDAAN PELAKSANAAN (SCHORSING) KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 74/G/2014/PTUN-BDG Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana; Ladyva Rizqina Dinissa; Amanda Khoirunnisa S; Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.137-158

Abstract

The Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court is a pure law which means that there is no obstacle in implementing the State Administrative Decision (KTUN) if the KTUN is sued. However, the Plaintiff can apply to postpone the disputed KTUN as compensation during the examination. The research method of this journal is normative juridical and qualitative descriptive with analytical theory. Since the issuance of the Judicial Administration Law, there have been several developments in delaying the implementation of a decision, especially in its mechanism. There are several factors that become the basis for the judge's consideration in granting a request for a postponement of the implementation of a decision, this is regulated in Article 67 of Law Number 5 of 1986, one of which is the very urgent interest of the Plaintiff. This is because the Plaintiff will suffer huge losses if the decision being sued is issued.
KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM SENGKETA TANAH TERHADAP SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH Onma Ezra Rodi Aprilo; Langgam Ihutan; Eric Halomoan; Anandersah Sinaga; Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.159-174

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to knowing how the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia is and how the competence of the State Administrative Court is if there is a land dispute over land rights certificates. This article was compiled using 2 (two) types of approaches, namely the normative approach and the historical approach where this article is a normative research article. Based on the results of the discussion analysis, the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court is the authority to examine, decide, and resolve state administrative disputes where there are existing restrictions.
PENERAPAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT TERHADAP SKEMA GUGATAN OBJEK GUGATAN KEBIJAKAN KEMENTERIAN PANRB TERKAIT TENAGA HONORER DALAM LINGKUP PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Adzra Arvianda; Annastasya Divana P M; Hanuun Zainum A; Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.95-116

Abstract

Law No. 5 of 2014 regulates the legality of Honorary Personnel as non-ASN employees. In essence, there are provisions regarding the appointment of honorary personnel to become civil servants with conditions that must be met. Moreover, the problem continues when the number of Honorary Personnel in Government Agencies increases and disrupts the balance of the arrangement of human resources (HR) of the apparatus in each of these agencies. As a settlement effort, the PANRB Ministry issued the PANRB Ministerial Letter Number B/185/M.SM.02.03/202 which emphasized the provisions of PP. 49 of 2018. This becomes an interesting topic when it is associated with the issue of the rights of Honorary Personnel and the application of the Citizen Lawsuit lawsuit to the Administrative Court. This writing uses a normative research method with a literature study which is then analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using the inductive method. The conclusion that was found was that the Honorary Personnel had the right to file a lawsuit with the Administrative Court because the object of the disputed letter included the State Administrative Court. However, Citizen Lawsuit is not optimal enough as a scheme for filing a lawsuit and it is better to use ordinary legal practices. Keywords : citizen lawsuit, state administrative courts, honorary staff
Analysis of the Development of the State Administrative Court System (Case Study of Decision No. 35/G/2019/PTUN.SRG) Tiara Bastari Putri; Nadhira Zahra Farida; Alfatesya Haifa; Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2023): IPMHI Law Journal, January 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang in collaboration with Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v3i1.57727

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia terus mengalami perkembangan seiring dengan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan. Perkembangan ini dapat dibuktikan dari pengesahan UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 terkait perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Selain oleh undang-undang tersebut, perkembangan sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara juga dipengaruhi oleh UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Adapun salah satu perkembangan yang paling terlihat adalah adanya perluasan subjek dan objek dalam sengketa tata usaha negara. Pengertian Keputusan Administrasi Pemerintahan/Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara menurut UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 berbeda dengan pengertian menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. Hal yang membedakan adalah dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 1986, keputusan harus bersifat konkrit, individual, dan final serta menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi orang atau badan hukum perdata. Sementara, menurut UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 hal tersebut tidak disyaratkan. Dengan adanya perluasan ini, maka kewenangan PTUN dalam mengadili suatu KTUN semakin meluas. Salah satu contoh penerapan dari perluasan objek sengketa ini adalah dengan adanya Putusan PTUN No. 35/G/2019/PTUN.SRG yang mengabulkan gugatan 6 mahasiswa kepada Direktur PKN STAN atas objek sengketa berupa surat keputusan yang menyatakan bahwa 6 mahasiswa ini tidak lulus dalam ujian. Majelis Hakim dalam amar putusannya memutuskan untuk mengabulkan gugatan Penggugat dengan pertimbangan bahwa Keputusan tersebut dibentuk tanpa memperhatikan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik yaitu asas kecermatan dan asas penyelenggaraan tertib penyelenggaraan negara.
Co-Authors Adrian E. Rompis Adzra Arvianda Alfatesya Haifa Amanda Khoirunnisa S Anandersah Sinaga Annastasya Divana P M Eric Halomoan Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati Hanuun Zainum A Ladyva Rizqina Dinissa Langgam Ihutan Nadhira Zahra Farida Onma Ezra Rodi Aprilo Sondika Ragani Tiara Bastari Putri