Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNITY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAWS IN INDONESIA Yulia Monita; Elizabeth Siregar; Dheny Wahyudi
Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Berumpun : International Journal Of Social, Politics, and Humanities
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.075 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/berumpun.v2i2.19

Abstract

Law Enforcement Problems including corruption, both prevention and eradication of corruption are not only the duty of law enforcers, but the duties of all parties including the public, community participation in the prevention and eradication of corruption have been regulated in many laws and regulations in Indonesia, this matter is interesting in detail, whether the regulation of community participation is still not appropriate so that the public does not know it or still needs a deeper analysis of the provisions of the articles on community participation so that the community is more optimal in playing an active role in efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption. Based on the explanation, the problem in this research is: How are the Settings and Forms of Community Participation in the Prevention and Eradication of Corruption in the Perspective of Laws in Indonesia? To answer this problem, the type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research that is a type of research that examines matters that are theoretical, principles, conceptions, legal doctrines and legal norms relating to community participation in the framework of prevention and combating corruption in the perspective of legislation in Indonesia. While the legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study will analyze legally the rules and forms of community participation in the prevention and eradication of criminal acts of corruption in various laws and regulations in Indonesia. There are several regulations that still need to be improved in the formulation of norms so that they can be more understood and understood by the public. Recommendations from this research are the arrangement and forms of community participation in the prevention and eradication of criminal acts of corruption in various laws and regulations in Indonesia must have a good norm formulation and need to be socialized to the public so that people know and participate, so the formulation of norms in the legislation is not only contained in legislation but can be applied by the community in the context of preventing and eradicating criminal acts of corruption in the perspective of legislation in Indonesia.
PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA ANAK DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN ANAK SEI. BULU MUARA BULIAN Monita, Yulia; Hafrida, Hafrida; Siregar, Elisabeth
Publikasi Pendidikan Vol 5, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Prodi PGSD FIP UNM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (595.16 KB) | DOI: 10.26858/publikan.v5i3.1613

Abstract

This research is a multi-years research that is planned to be completed in 2 (two) years.  In this year this research aims to see the implementation of child offender in The Children Penitentiary  Sei. Bulu Muara Bulian Jambi. This research is an ?Empirical Research?, that conducted  field research on The Child Penitentiary Sei. Bulu Muara Bulian, and conduct interviews to Children Inmates and   observations tothe implementation of the development ofthe children inmates, in addition this research also conducted on The Law and Human Rights Ministry of Jambi. The result of the research shows in The Children Penitentiary Sei. Bulu Muara Bulian Jambi not only populated by children in mates, but also combined with adult female in mates. The result of the field research on the 27 may 2015 the number ofadult female in mates reached47 (Forty-seven) people, the number ofchildinmatesare36 (thirty six) people. The results offield research hasserious problems: 1) from Goal of Development aspect ofthere isa big differences, the purpose of fosteringa child in mates are education and training while the fostering goal of adult women in mates are correctional. 2) From the practical aspectsof the available labor builder is a builder who should have the power (tupoksi) to foster in mates child obtains heavier burden than duties that are supposed, the obligation to implement the guidance to adult female in mates. 3) From the aspect of facilities there is no additional facilities relating with the increasing of the work load. 4) from the aspects of employee resources builder also there is no special addition.The head of the law Ministry and Human Rights Jambi province says the consideration of the merger because of the proximity characteristic still possible to combine. Seeing the empirical condition shows the needs  for the application of Law No.11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Justice System where the children criminals tries to avoid a child in the punishment imprison ment through the efforts diversion andrestorative justice. The research on the effectiveness of restorative justice through the application of this diversion will be continued in the research studyon the second year. Keywords: Inmates Children, Children Penitentiary, Development of Inmates Children.
Sidik Jari sebagai Pendukung Alat Bukti dalam Proses Penyidikan Perkara Pidana Uswatun Hasanah; Yulia Monita
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11086

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the use of fingerprints to support the process of proving evidence in the investigation of criminal cases in the Jambi Regional Police and to determine the effectiveness of fingerprints as supporting evidence in the investigation of criminal cases. The number of criminal cases that occurred in Jambi made the police improve their performance, one of which was in the investigation process by looking for evidence of evidence, one of which was a fingerprint. The results of this study are the use of fingerprints can support the process of proving evidence in the investigation of criminal cases, because the discovery of fingerprints of someone suspected of committing a crime will make it easier for the police to find other evidence, for in Jambi itself the use of fingerprints as preliminary evidence rarely seen from 2016-2019, there were only 5 cases that used fingerprints as an initial guide, because in Jambi itself still had many shortcomings such as at the time of the crime scene many fingerprints were found but many were already damaged, and many criminal acts were indirectly reported, for its own effectiveness the Jambi Regional Police have very complete and sophisticated equipment such as those at the National Police Headquarters and are very effective in terms of cases and tools that all 5 cases that occurred were effective using fingerprints as evidence for initial instructions. Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui penggunaan sidik jari bisa mendukung proses pembuktian alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana di Polda Jambi serta untuk mengetahui efektivitas sidik jari sebagai pendukung alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana. Banyaknya kasus kejahatan yang terjadi di Jambi membuat pihak kepolisian semakin meningkatkan kinerjanya yang salah satunya ialah dalam proses penyidikan dengan mencari bukti petunjuk yang salah satunya sidik jari. Hasil penelitian ini adalah penggunaan sidik jari bisa mendukung proses pembuktian alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana, karena dengan ditemukannya sidik jari seseorang yang diduga melakukan tindak pidana maka akan memudahkan pihak kepolisian dalam mencari bukti lain, untuk di Jambi sendiri penggunaan sidik jari sebagai bukti awal jarang dilakukan terlihat dari tahun 2016-2019 hanya terdapat 5 kasus yang menggunakan sidik jari sebagai petunjuk awal, karena di Jambi sendiri masih memiliki banyak kekurangan seperti pada saat olah TKP banyak ditemukan sidik jari akan tetapi banyak yang sudah rusak, dan banyak kejadian tindak pidana yang tidak langsung dilaporkan, untuk efektivitasnya sendiri Polda Jambi memiliki peralatan yang sangat lengkap dan canggih sudah seperti di Mabes Polri dan sangat efektif dari segi kasus dan alatnya bahwa dari 5 kasus yang terjadi semuanya efektif dengan menggunakan sidik jari sebagai alat bukti petunjuk awal.
AN OVERVIEW ON THE JUDICIAL MONITORING AND SUPERVISION URGENCY IN MAKING CLEAN JUDICIARY Yulia Monita; Nys Arfa; Elizabeth Siregar
Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Berumpun : International Journal Of Social, Politics, and Humanities
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/berumpun.v4i1.42

Abstract

A clean judiciary is the hope of all levels of Indonesian society. A clean judiciary is a court that carries out its duties and functions based on the provisions of the applicable laws and prioritizes legal certainty, justice, and benefit. This study aims to see how regulating and changing forms of judicial supervision and warning in realizing clean justice and to answer whether other legal rules are still needed to strengthen the role of the people who participate in and monitor the judicial path. This research is normative legal research, it is a study that examines matters of a theoretical nature, principles, conceptions, legal doctrine, and legal principles related to judicial supervision and supervision in the context of realizing a clean judiciary. Meanwhile, the legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and their sources. The results of this research are a) judicial monitoring and supervision should be done in order to conduct a clean judiciary, b) monitoring and supervising are done not to intervening the results of courts decisions but as a measuring tool to what extent the decisions are fair to the society, c) there are still several judges' decisions which, according to society, are controversial, illustrating the public's distrust of the judiciary.
Kajian Normatif Tentang Penyitaan Barang Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yulia Monita; Hafrida Hafrida; Nys Arfa; Elizabeth Siregar
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Masih banyaknya permasalahan yang terjadi berkenaan dengan penyitaan barang bukti dalam Tindak pidana korupsi, baik mengenai pengaturan maupun implikasi dari penyitaan barang bukti dalam Tindak pidana korupsi. Hal ini penting untuk di teliti, karena pengaturan akan membawa dampak dari keabsahan alat bukti tersebut. Keabsahan alat bukti ini akan berpengaruh untuk hakim dalam pertimbangan hukum dan memutuskan suatu putusan dari suatu kasus Tindak pidana korupsi. Hal ini harus jelas untuk memberikan kepastian hukum berkaitan prosedur penyitaan barang bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi, agar alat bukti yang di sita tersebut memang dilakukan sesuai ketentuan hukum yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Namun ada persoalan jika penyitaan dilakukan tidak sesuai prosedur atau bahkan melanggar ham, tapi alat bukti tersebut tetap dijadikan alat bukti dipersidangan dan tetap dipertimbangakan oleh hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah perangkat hukum untuk penyitaan barang bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi sudah cukup memandai, termasuk impilkasi keabsahan dari barang bukti tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Apakah masih diperlukan aturan hukum lainnya untuk pengaturan penyitaan barang bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Berdasarkan paparan tersebut, maka yang menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah: Bagaimanakah Pengaturan penyitaan barang bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi ? Bagaimana implikasi penyitaan alat bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi terhadap keabsahan alat bukti dalam sistem peradilan pidana Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, maka tipe penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tipe penelitian hukum normatif yaitu suatu tipe penelitian yang mengkaji hal-hal yang bersifat teoritis, asas, konsepsi, doktrin hukum serta kaidah hukum yang berhubungan dengan penyitaan barang bukti dalam tindak pdiana korupsi. Sedangkan bahan hukum yang dipergunakan adalah bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier beserta sumbernya. Dari hasil penelitian menjawab semua permasalahan yang ada dengan cara menganalisis secara yuridis yang dapat memberikan kontribusi berupa pemikiran-pemikiran secara hukum mengenai pengaturan dan implikasi penyitaaan alat bukti dalam tindak pidana korupsi tersebut.
Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sri Dewi Rahayu Dewi; Yulia Monita
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8314

Abstract

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan pidana terhadap pelaku penyalahguna narkotika golongan I bagi diri sendiri. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum Yuridis Normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyebab hakim menjatuhkan putusan berbeda terhadap kedua kasus ini karena terdapat keadaan yang meringankan terhadap kedua terdakwa. Pada studi kasus keadaan yang meringankan yang dipertimbangkan oleh hakim yaitu: karena terdakwa merupakan korban penyalahguna narkotika yang sudah kecanduan serta didukung dengan keterangan saksi di persidangan. Oleh karena itu hakim harus mempertimbangkan fakta yuridis, fakta persidangan dan fakta sosiologis dari terdakwa. Hal ini dilakukan agar terdakwa merasa bahwa hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana sesuai dengan perbuatan terdakwa. ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the basic considerations of judges in convicting criminals against class I narcotics abusers themselves. This research method is a normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that the cause of the judge handed down a different verdict in these two cases because there were circumstances that alleviated the two defendants. In the case study the mitigating circumstances considered by the judge are: because the defendant is a victim of narcotics who are addicted and supported by witness testimony at the trial. Therefore the judge must consider the juridical facts, the facts of the trial and the sociological facts of the defendant. This was done so that the defendant felt that the judge handed down the criminal verdict according to the defendant's actions.
Pidana Denda sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan pada Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Ana Indah Cahyani; Yulia Monita; Elizabeth Siregar
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9560

Abstract

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami pengaturan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga berikut dan  implementasi pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis empiris, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga belum terlaksana. Pidana denda sebagai alternatif pidana penjara pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perlu dikembangkan. Karena pidana denda mampu memberikan efek jera dan selaras dengan tujuan penghapusan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Selain itu, pidana denda lebih mengutamakan keutuhan rumah tangga yang harmonis dan sejahtera guna mengurangi kemungkinan perceraian. Maka dari itu pada kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang tidak terlalu berat perlu diterapkan pidana denda sebagai alternatif dari pidana penjara agar terciptanya keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan terutama bagi masyarakat, korban dan terpidana itu sendiri. ABSTRACT The objectives to be achieved in this study are: 1) to know and understand the regulation of criminal sanction in cases of domestic violence according to the Law Number 23 Year 2004 Elimination of Domestic Violence. 2) to find out the implementation of criminal fine as an alternative punishment in the crime of domestic violence. Using the empirical juridical method, the study has found that criminal fines as an alternative to criminal acts in domestic violence have not been implemented. Criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in domestic violence should be developed because it is able to provide a detterent effect and are aligned with the aim of eliminating domestic violence. Criminal fines prioritize the integrity of a harmonious and prosperous household in order to reduce the possibility of diorce. Therefore in cases of domestic violence that are not too severe it is necessary to apply criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in order to create justice, certainty and benefits especially for the community, victims and convicts themselves.
Pelaksanaan Pembinaan Narapidana Anak yang Dijatuhi Pidana Penjara Jangka Pendek di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA) Tiwi Sasmita; Kabib Nawawi; Yulia Monita
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v2i1.12685

Abstract

This article aims to find out how the implementation of short-term guidance of child prisoners at The Children Penitentiary of Muara Bulian and the obstacles in the implementation of the guidance. The result showed that The Children Penitentiary of Muara Bulian has tried to provide the guidance to child prisoners in accordance with applicable regulations, by providing spiritual guidance by helding a monthly religious lectures by clergy presenters at Muara Bulian. In addition, physical development is also given to child prisoners in the form of routine sports such as morning exercise as well as skills development for child prisoners such as making handicrafts in the form of flower vases made from used paper and plastic. The obstacles in guiding child prisoners at The Children Penitentiary of Muara Bulian include the lack of attention from the inmate’s family, lack of officers and experts, lack of funds, and lack of community participation. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the facilities and infrastructure so that the guidance received by the children runs optimally according to their respective talents, especially in the fields of education and health. Abstrak Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan pembinaan narapidana anak jangka pendek di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Muara Bulian serta kendala dalam pelaksanaan pembinaan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Muara Bulian sudah berusaha melakukan pembinaan terhadap narapidana anak sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku, pembinaan kerohanian/keagamaan dilakukan melalui kegiatan ceramah dan konsultasi religii yang dilaksanakan secara rutin setiap bulan. Pembinaan fisik dilakukan melalui kegiatan senam pagi dan olahraga lain. Untuk pembinaan terhadap peningkatan dilakukan melalui pelatihan keterampilan pembuatan berbagai kerajinan seperti pembuatan vas bunga dari barang bekas. Kendala dalam pembinaan narapidana anak di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Muara BUlian diantaranya, kurangnya perhatian dari keluarga narapidana, kurangnya petugas dan tenaga ahli, kurangnya dana, dan kurangnya partisipasi masyarakat. Oleh karena itu perlu ditingkatkan saran dan prasarana di lembaga pembinaan supaya pembinaan yang didapat oleh anak berjalan maksimal sesuai dengan bakat masing-masing khususnya di bidang pendidikan dan kesehatan.
Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan oleh Jaksa Terhadap Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kejaksaan Negeri Muaro Jambi Tri Nada Sari; Elly Sudarti; Yulia Monita
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v2i2.13716

Abstract

This article aims to find the execution of court decisions by prosecutors in crime of paying subtitute money in criminal deed of corruption at Muaro Jambi District Prosecutor’s Office. Aims to discuss is: why the criminal excecution of payment of subtitute money cannot be carried out optimally and the efforts made by the prosecutor as excecutor to maximizing the payment of compensation in criminal cases of corruption in order to recover state losses. The research results obtained in this research are: 1) the execution of substitute money punishment but the leniency is close to the main criminal. 2) the efforts of executing attorney to maximize the penalty for paying subtitute money, substitute money punishment is from of criminal application aimed to recovering state financial losses, the excecutor prosecutor’s efforts to maximize penalty of subtitute money, namely by ordering convict to pay as much as possible. Obtained from corruption. Prosecutor has authority to confiscate and auction off property, and trace the assets of convicted person to pay subtitute money, if convict’s property is insufficient to pay subtitute money, then he will sentence imprisonment which does not exceed the basic threat of imprisonment.   ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui eksekusi putusan pengadilan oleh jaksa terhadap pidana pembayaran uang pengganti pada tindak pidana korupsi di Kejaksaan Negeri Muaro Jambi, yang dibahas yaitu: mengapa eksekusi pidana pembayaran uang pengganti tidak dapat dilaksanakan secara maksimal dan upaya yang dilakukan oleh jaksa selaku eksekutor untuk memaksimalkan pidana pembayaran uang pengganti dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi demi mengembalikan kerugian negara. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1) Eksekusi pidana uang pengganti, pidana uang pengganti sebagai pidana tambahan pada tindak pidana korupsi merupakan pidana tambahan, pidana pembayaran uang pengganti ini bersifat fleksible. Walaupun pembayaran uang pengganti ini hanya bersifat sebagai pidana tambahan, namun bobot berat-ringannya mendekati pidana pokok. 2) Upaya Jaksa eksekutor dalam memaksimalkan pidana pembayaran uang pengganti, pidana uang pengganti merupakan bentuk penerapan pidana yang bertujuan untuk memulihkan kerugian keuangan negara, upaya jaksa eksekutor dalam memaksimalkan pidana pembayaran uang pengganti yaitu dengan memerintahkan kepada terpidana agar membayar sebanyak-banyaknya sama dengan harta benda yang di peroleh dari tindak pidana korupsi. Jaksa berwenang menyita dan melelang harta benda, serta melacak aset milik terpidana untuk membayar uang pengganti, apabila harta benda terpidana tidak mencukupi untuk membayar uang pengganti, maka dipidana penjara yang lamanya tidak melebihi ancaman pokok pidana penjara.
Problematika dalam Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nurholidah Nurholidah; Sahuri Lasmadi; Yulia Monita
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v2i3.16325

Abstract

This article aims to find out how the investigation into criminal acts of corruption was carried out by the Tanjung Jabung Timur Police investigators, and what were the obstacles in additional investigations to fulfill P-19. The method used is empirical juridical, examining the gap between das sollen and das sein. The results; First, the investigator on corruption at the Tanjung Jabung Timur Police in carrying out additional investigations to fulfill P-19 found various obstacles so the investigator passed the 14-day deadline specified in Article 138 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Second, these obstacles are, the schedule of expert examinations is determined by the appointed expert, the witness does not fulfill the summons of the investigator, the presence of witnesses and experts outside the province, the address of the witness is difficult to find. Suggestions: 1) Investigators should be more careful in examining case file before it is submitted to the public prosecutor so that it can run effectively, efficiently, and giving satisfaction to the public, 2) KUHAP should be revised as soon as possible, especially regarding the 14-day period for investigators to correct the case file because in finding evidence is very unlikely to be done within 14 days and the Criminal Procedure Code can regulate the legal consequences for investigators who violate the provisions of Article 138 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.   ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penyidikan terhadap tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan penyidik Polri Polres Tanjung Jabung Timur, dan apa saja kendala dalam penyidikan tambahan untuk pemenuhan P-19. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, yaitu mengkaji mengenai kesenjangan antara das sollen dengan das sein. Hasil penelitian ini; pertama, penyidik tipikor Polres Tanjung Jabung Timur dalam melakukan penyidikan tambahan untuk memenuhi P-19 menemukan berbagai kendala sehingga penyidik melewati batas waktu 14 hari yang sudah ditentukan dalam Pasal 138 Ayat (2) KUHAP. Kedua, kendala tersebut yaitu, jadwal pemeriksaan ahli ditentukan oleh ahli yang ditunjuk, saksi tidak memenuhi panggilan penyidik, keberadaan saksi dan ahli diluar provinsi, alamat saksi sulit ditemukan. Saran: 1) Penyidik harus lebih teliti memeriksa berkas perkara sebelum diserahkan kepada penuntut umum agar dapat berjalan dengan efektif, efisen, dan memberikan kepuasan kepada masyarakat, 2) KUHAP secepatnya direvisi khususnya mengenai rentang waktu 14 hari bagi penyidik untuk memperbaiki berkas perkara karena dalam menemukan bukti-bukti sangat tidak dimungkinkan dapat dilakukan dalam waktu 14 hari tersebut dan KUHAP dapat mengatur mengenai akibat hukum bagi penyidik yang melanggar  ketentuan Pasal 138 Ayat (2) KUHAP.