Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2017 - 2022
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
nurnaningsih amriani
Candidate Doctor of Law in Sumatera Utara University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN ATAS PUTUSAN ARBITRASE ICSID DI INDONESIA DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN BEBERAPA NEGARA (The Implementation of Transparency Principles for ICSID Arbitration Awards in Indonesia and the Comparison with Several Countries) Amriani, Nurnaningsih
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 5, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (980.257 KB) | DOI: 10.25216/JHP.5.1.2016.113-134

Abstract

Kerahasiaan putusan arbitrase ICSID sudah mulai diterobos dengan keterbukaan putusan atas peluang yang diberikan oleh Pasal 48 ayat (5) Konvensi ICSID dan Aturan 48 ayat (4) ICSID Arbitration Rules. Perubahan norma hukum dari kerahasiaan menjadi keterbukaan putusan arbitrase ICSID dengan membandingkan penerapannya antara negara Indonesia dengan Malaysia, Singapura dan Jepang, diharapkan memberi manfaat yang besar bagi masyarakat secara luas termasuk didalamnya negara anggota ICSID. Hasil penelitian disertasi ini membuktikan bahwa keterbukaan putusan arbitrase ICSID diperlukan daripada kerahasiaan putusan dengan beberapa alasan penting dan tidak menimbulkan masalah. Bahkan membantu mewujudkan pelaksanaan asas pemerintahan yang baik. Melalui tulisan ini akan diketahui perlunya unifikasi hukum mengenai kewajiban publikasi putusan dan perlunya amandemen Undang-Undang Arbitrase di Indonesia.  Confidentiality ICSID arbitration award already started breached by the transparency award on the opportunity provided by Article 48 paragraph (5) of the ICSID Convention and Rule 48 paragraph  (4) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Changes in the legal norms of confidentiality to transparency of ICSID arbitration award by comparing its application in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Japan, are expected to provide great benefits for society include ICSID member countries. This dissertation research results prove that the ICSID arbitration ruling required transparency rather than confidentiality award for several important reasons and not cause problems. Even it helped realize the implementation of good governance principles. the article will note the need for unification of the laws regarding the responsibility of publication award and the need to amend the Arbitration Law in Indonesia.
PENERAPAN PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN ATAS PUTUSAN ARBITRASE ICSID DI INDONESIA DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN BEBERAPA NEGARA Amriani, Nurnaningsih
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 5, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan MARI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1591.215 KB) | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.113-134

Abstract

Confidentiality ICSID arbitration award already started breached by the transparency award on the opportunity provided by Article 48 paragraph (5) of the ICSID Convention and Rule 48 paragraph (4) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Changes in the legal norms of confidentiality to transparency of ICSID arbitration award by comparing its application in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Japan, are expected to provide great benefits for society include ICSID member countries. This dissertation research results prove that the ICSID arbitration ruling required transparency rather than confidentiality award for several important reasons and not cause problems. Even it helped realize the implementation of good governance principles. the article will note the need for unification of the laws regarding the responsibility of publication award and the need to amend the Arbitration Law in Indonesia.Keywords : principles of transparency, arbitration award, ICSID, state.
INTERPRETATION PUBLIC POLICY IN RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD IN INDONESIA TURN ASIDE THE LEGAL CERTAINTY Amriani, Nurnaningsih
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Legal and Development
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2014.001.01.03

Abstract

Does not violate “public policy (public order/openbaare orde)” is the one of the main reasons for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award in Indonesia. It follow the rules of Article V of the New York Convention 1958 in which Indonesia ratified through Presidential Decree No. 34 of 1981. This article aims to provide a form of judge interpretation of the meaning of public order before and after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, so there is no legal certainty. Therefore the meaning of "public policy" does not limit the scope described in the decree and the Arbitration Act, therefore the interpretation obtained by the decision of the Supreme Court who refused and received recognition of foreign arbitral award in Indonesia. Through the interpretation of this article, the parties involved in the arbitration agreement can predict whether their arbitration award may be given the recognition and implementation in Indonesia.
Co-Authors