Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Nurini Aprilianda
Universitas Brawijaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
JURIDICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE LEGAL NORM VOID OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA Indrayanti, Kadek Wiwik; Suhariningsih, Suhariningsih; Ruba’i, Masruchin; Aprilianda, Nurini
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (82.864 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01.07

Abstract

Legal void of interfaith marriages in Indonesia to date has not offered legal certainty and sense of fairness to couples of differing religions. Particularly, their rights to form a family and to freedom of religion are unprotected; whereas those rights are guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court’s ruling had rejected Judicial Review on Article 2 section 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The consideration provided by the Bogor District Court regarding the rejection was that the judge’s interpretation of article 2 section 1, yielded the assertion that marrying couples should have been of the same faith. The judge also took into consideration the religious values embraced by the prospective applicant who happened to be a Catholic widow while the prospective groom was a Muslim. A similar consideration was made by the Constitutional Court where in, among others, it was stated that the constitutional rights of marriage entailed the obligation to respect the constitutional rights of other people. Therefore, to avoid any conflicts in the implementation of those constitutional rights, it is necessary to have a regulation on the implementation of constitutional rights conducted by the state.Consequently, the juridical implications of interfaith marriage legal norm void give rise to the judges’ differing interpretations which are unfavorable to interfaith couples. The validity of these marriages cannot be accomplished, resulting in the marriages to be deemed invalid, implicating the status and position of women and children as well as heritance issues.
PHYLOSOPHICAL AND CONSTITUSIONAL PROTECTION TOWARDS RELIGION IN INDONESIA Silfiah, Rossa Ilma; Luth, Thohir; Sugiri, Bambang; Aprilianda, Nurini
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (131.72 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.04

Abstract

Legal protection on religion is certainty for a state with Pancasila principle. The first principle    the Divinity of the Only God has been spirit of the following points, as living guidance for Indonesian country.  The believing of    the Divinity of the Only God shows that the Indonesian Republic is religious based country by protecting freedom to have religion for its people.  This regulation has implication in governmental circle, that the country makes Religion Ministry as one of ministries that its existence has the same position to other state institutions.   The implementation of legal protection toward religion needs legitimating in the field of civil law, showed in issuing President   Decree   No. 1 of 1965 on the Preventing of    Misuse and/or Religion Staining. The existence of this   Decree  in Old Order has been legitimated  newly as a Law  by issuing the Law   No. 5 of 1969, thus the  President Decree has been added to the  Criminal Code, Act   156a.
REKONSTRUKSI MODEL PUTUSAN HAKIM PERKARA KDRT MELALUI PENDEKATAN HUKUM PROGRESIF Endrawati, Lucky; Aprilianda, Nurini; Farikha, Mufatikhatul
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 22, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2015.0048.73-94

Abstract

Case of domestic violence had increased every year, this is caused by people have a paradigm that domestic violence is privat domain. Even though, domestic violence be regulated by domestic violence elimination Act number 23 in 2004, but the victim often don’t recognize justice. In common law jurisdictions concentrate on judges, whose opinions contain masses of reasoning. In civil law jurisdictions, they focus more on the writings of jurists, both because their works are regarded as important evidence of what the law is, and because court judgements are much less elaborate in their ratiocinations, judge legal reasoning used Act priority, specially Act for Domestic Violence Elimination. So, that reasons for use progressive law approach
Implications of Legal Loophole concerning Liability over Delay in Restitution Payment by Criminal Offender Aprilianda, Nurini; Fibriansyah, Ryan Ilham
Jurnal Media Hukum Volume 28, Number 1, June 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v28i1.10411

Abstract

Crime is harmful to society, especially to the victims. Legal protection should be taken into account to help the victims recover from the loss suffered. The protection can be made through the payment of restitution by either the offender or the third party. Such an issue has been addressed in the existing law, especially the Witness and Victim Protection Act 2014 (Amendment) and the Government Regulation No. 7 of 2018 concerning Compensation, Restitution, and Aid for Witness and Victim. Unfortunately, they do not impose any sanction over the delay in restitution payment by the third party or the offender. This paper aims at discussing the implication of this legal loophole. This normative legal research employs a statutory approach. It is found that the legal loophole has exposed the victims to secondary victimization due to uncertainty and injustice.
Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Hakim Berkaitan Diversi yang Melanggar Ketentuan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Endriyanti, Megah Novita; Aprilianda, Nurini; Madjid, Abdul
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Juni 2019
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2947

Abstract

This diversion is the process of resolving cases of violations of law that occur, namely by bringing together the victims and their families and the perpetrators as well as their families to sit together to discuss the settlement of cases in a family manner. Legislation on the juvenile justice system. To answer the purpose of the paper, normative legal research is used, using a legal approach used to examine the Child Criminal Justice System Act, while the case approach uses the determination of judges in the case of Children. The results of the study indicate that the juridical implication of the judges’ determination regarding diversion which violates the provisions of the law on juvenile criminal justice systems is that they can be canceled, which can still be carried out as long as no party submits a cancellation. This diversion effort is a manifestation of restorative justice which aims to avoid children from the judicial process. So when the diversion is successfully carried out and an agreement arises, it means that the goal of restorative justice has been achieved.How to cite item: Endriyanti, M., Aprilianda, N., Madjid, A. (2019). Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Hakim Berkaitan Diversi yang Melanggar Ketentuan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 58-68. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2947
ANALISIS YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN NARAPIDANA SEBAGAI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR Sugiri, Bambang; Aprilianda, Nurini; Hartadi, Hanif
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to examine the inmates position as a justice collaborator in the disclosure of organized crime that can assist law enforcement officers. This is againstthe backdrop of crown witnesses who are often used in proving criminal cases but are judged to be in violation of human rights. The difficulty of disclosure of organized crime is that the perpetrators involved in organized crime are bound by the oath of silence (omerta). Information from inmates related to crime networks he has committed, facilitates the disclosure of organized crime by law enforcement officers. This paper is based on the results of legal research with a statutory approach, conceptual approachand comparative approach. The results showed that inmates as justice collaborators have a role that can be utilized by law enforcement officials in uncovering organized crime as well as as a form of correcting the wrongdoing of the inmates themselvesas in the purpose of funding, so that inmates can be accepted back into society.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Endriyanti, Megah Novita Fibriansyah, Ryan Ilham Hartadi, Hanif Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti Lucky MH SH. Endrawati Luth, Thohir Mufatikhatul Farikha, Mufatikhatul Prema, I Ketut Arjuna Satya Ruba?I, Masruchin Ruba’I, Masruchin Silfiah, Rossa Ilma Sugiri, Bambang Sugiri, Bambang Suhariningsih