Maxasai Indra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KOORDINASI DAN SUPERVISI KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM MENCEGAH DAN MEMBERANTAS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI ', Syahrul; ', Erdianto; Indra, Maxasai
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Wisuda Februari 2015
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is widespread in society. In law enforcement, corruption, of the Corruption Eradication Commission can not do it alone, given the vast area of Indonesia. Corruption Eradication Commission should cooperate with other law enforcement agencies. Undag Act No. 30 of 2002 explained that the Corruption Eradication Commission may conduct coordination and supervision against Corruption, and act as Coordinator of the Institute. Coordination and supervision is done during this time to experience the tension between the phases of the Anti-Corruption Commission with the Indonesian National Police, for example, is the case of the SIM Simulator. The purpose of writing this thesis: first, to determine the coordination and supervision arrangements in preventing and combating corruption in Indonesia. Secondly, To know the concept of coordination and supervision ideally in preventing and combating corruption in Indonesia. From the research there are two main things that can be inferred. First, the function of coordination and supervision remains a secondary function of the Corruption Eradication Commission, in addition to the MOU of 2012 on Optimization of Anti-Corruption Coordination and Supervision weaken the authority possessed by the Corruption Eradication Commission. In practice there are sectoral ego, it arises as a result of an investigation into corruption can be done by several investigators agencies. Additionally Limitations of Human Resources is also a problem of weak coordination and supervision of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Second, to improve the coordination and supervision of one of the ways you can do is to establish the Integrated Anti-Corruption Coordination Center (SKPKT), so that the cooperation between the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Police and the Attorney General can be done with the same institutional standards.Keywords : Coordination - Supervision- Corruption Eradication Commission – Prevention - Corruption
EFEKTIFITAS FUNGSI PENGAWASAN PANITIA PENGAWAS PEMILU KOTA PEKANBARU DALAM PELAKSANAAN PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD DAN DPRD TAHUN 2014 BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2012 Ferdy Aryona Putra; Emilda Firdaus; Maxasai indra
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Wisuda Februari 2015
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The occurance of elections in Indonesia is held directly, thus, supervising the ececution of the election is required. As set out in Constitution Act number 15 of 2011 (Undang-Undang No.15 Tahun 2011), Election Supervisory Committee has duties , powers and obligations in the conduct of elections . In the 2014 legislative elections helt in the city of Pekanbaru , some form of violation occurred, for instance, administrative offense , criminal offense , violation of code of conduct , and those are not a violation of the election instead. Based on this conception , the writing of this thesis generates three formulation of the problem , whic are : First , how is the function of supervising the Election Supervisory Committee ( Panwaslu ) of Pekanbaru city in carrying out the task of monitoring the election of members of DPR , DPD and DPRD 2014 by Constitution Act number 8 of 2012 (Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2012)? Secondly , What are the obstacles regarding the Election Supervisory Committee ( Panwaslu ) in the implementation's monitoring of election of members of DPR, DPD and DPRD in Pekanbaru city? The research method in this study start with first, the type of research is sociological and descriptive . Secondly, the research site of Election Supervisory Committee of Pekanbaru city. The source of data is supported by the primary, secondary, and tertiary data sources. Thirdly, the data agregation methods used are interviews , and a review of literature. After the data are collected and undergo qualitative analysis, then the sum up of conclusions is done within deductive thinking method, which is by analyzing problems from general into specific form Based on the conduction of the research, there are three main issues that can be concluded , first , the supervision function Election Supervisory Committee ( Panwaslu ) of Pekanbaru city in carrying out the task of monitoring the election of members of DPR , DPD and DPRD 2014 by Constitution Act number 8 of 2012 (Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2012) has not gone properly and not in maximum effort, because the presence of obstacles experienced by the Election Supervisory Committee . Secondly, the barriers faced by the Election Supervisory Committee ( Panwaslu ) in supervising the implementation of the legislative elections in the city of Pekanbaru include the factor of human resources, recruitment and formation factor of Election Supervisory Committee, and also geographical conditions .Keywords : Function - Election Supervisory Committee - Pekanbaru