M. Asikin, M.
Jurusan Maematika, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Style of Students on Double Loop Problem Solving Model with RME Approach Fajriyah, Euis; Mulyono, Mulyono; Asikin, M.
Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Vol 8 No 1 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (755.266 KB)

Abstract

Mathematical literacy ability and students cognitive styles play important role in mathematics learning. The purpose of this study was to know the quality of learning and mathematical literacy ability reviewed from the students' cognitive style in learning by using Double Loop Problem Solving model with the RME approach. This study conducted on VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 40 Semarang in the academic year of 2017/ 2018. This study applied a mixed method with concurrent embedded designs. The results of the study showed that learning by using Double Loop Problem Solving model with RME approach on students' mathematics literacy abilities is good qualified. Students with reflective cognitive style were able to master communication, mathematizing, reasoning and argumentation, and devising strategies for solving problems very well, the components of representation, using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation, and using mathematics tools were quite well mastered. Students with impulsive cognitive style were able to master communication very well, the components of mathematizing, reasoning and argumentation, representation, devising strategies for solving problems, using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation, were quite well mastered, and the component of using mathematical tools, have not been able to be mastered. Students with fast accurate cognitive style were able to master communication, mathematizing, representation, devising strategies for solving problems, using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation, and using mathematics tools very well, the component of reasoning and argumentation were quite well mastered. Students with slow-inaccurate cognitive style were quite well to master communication, mathematizing, reasoning and argumentation, devising strategies for solving problems, and using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation, the components of representation and using mathematics tools have not been able to be mastered.
KOMPARASI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA MENGGUNAKAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA HUMANISTIK DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DALAM SETTING MODEL PELATIHAN INNOMATTS Cahyaningsih, Restu; Asikin, M.
JURNAL NALAR PENDIDIKAN Vol 3, No 1 (2015): JURNAL NALAR PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Mahasiswa Penalaran UNM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (275.738 KB) | DOI: 10.26858/jnp.v3i1.1984

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis apakah terdapat kesesuaian antaraproses pembelajaran dengan RPP, untuk menguji apakah pendekatan PembelajaranMatematika Humanistik (PMH) dan pendekatan Problem Based Learning (PBL) dapatmencapai ketuntasan belajar dan apakah terdapat perbedaan antara kemampuanberpikir kreatif matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan PMH, pendekatan PBL, danpembelajaran konvensional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII SMPN4 Semarang tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 dan secara cluster random sampling diperolehtiga sampel kelas yaitu siswa kelas VIIA dan VIIB sebagai kelas eksperimen serta kelasVIIC sebagai kelas kontrol. Analisis data menggunakan uji proporsi dan uji ANAVA SatuJalur.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kesesuaian antara prosespembelajaran dengan RPP.Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa kedua kelaseksperimen telah mencapai ketuntasan belajar.Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan antarakemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan PMH,pendekatan PBL, dan pembelajaran konvensional.Disimpulkan bahwa kemampuanberpikir kreatif matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan PBL lebih baik daripadamenggunakan pendekatan PMH, dan pembelajaran konvensional.Kata kunci: PMH Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis, PBL.
MODEL INNOMATTS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETRAMPILAN GURU MATEMATIKA SMP DALAM MENERAPKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN PENILAIAN AUTENTIK Junaedi, I.; Asikin, M.
Rekayasa : Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi dan Pembelajaran Vol 13, No 2 (2015): Desember 2015
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/rekayasa.v13i2.5611

Abstract

This article to study how mathematics teacher to applies scientific approach and authentic assessment corresponds to curriculum 2013? Method that are utilized to know mathematics teacher in applies scientific approach and authentic assessment are done with training, assistance, observation, and interview. Based on observing and analisis are known (1 ) Lesson Plan with INNOMATTS’S models for scientific approach and authentic essessment that arranged by category “good ”, (2) teacher ability increaces, and (3 ) student response for active, criticak, and collaboration increases.
MODEL INNOMATTS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETRAMPILAN GURU MATEMATIKA SMP DALAM MENERAPKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN PENILAIAN AUTENTIK Junaedi, I.; Asikin, M.
Rekayasa : Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi dan Pembelajaran Vol 13, No 2 (2015): Desember 2015
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/rekayasa.v13i2.5611

Abstract

This article to study how mathematics teacher to applies scientific approach and authentic assessment corresponds to curriculum 2013? Method that are utilized to know mathematics teacher in applies scientific approach and authentic assessment are done with training, assistance, observation, and interview. Based on observing and analisis are known (1 ) Lesson Plan with INNOMATTS’S models for scientific approach and authentic essessment that arranged by category “good ”, (2) teacher ability increaces, and (3 ) student response for active, criticak, and collaboration increases.