Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.654
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dimensi Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal HAM Jurnal Hukum Respublica Ensiklopedia of Journal Menara Ilmu Ensiklopedia Social Review Jurnal Trias Politika PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Jurnal Sosio-komunika Riau Law Journal El Dusturie: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan
Duwi Handoko
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Persada Bunda, Pekanbaru
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PERBANDINGAN ANTARA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI PELAKU KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA HANDOKO, DUWI
Menara Ilmu Vol 11, No 74 (2017): Vol. XI Jilid 1 No. 74, Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v11i74.72

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 confirms that Indonesia is a country of law. The one important principle of state of law is the guarantee of the implementation of independent judicial power, free from the influence of other powers to organize judiciary to enforce the law and justice. This study is based on the curiosity of investigators in uncovering the scope and existence of judicial power in Indonesia. The scope and existence were restricted to two state institutions in the field of the judiciary, the Supreme Court (SC) and the Constitutional Court (CC). Therefore, this study aims to identify and analyze the comparison (similarities and differences) between the authority of the SC and the CC. This study views of its kind is a normative legal research. While the views of nature, descriptive study. SC and the CC have the same authority to be a court decision that is both first and last. SC and the CC provides access to people who can not afford as the recipient of legal aid to be able to act. SC have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, while the CC, does not have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, but the CC decision related to the decriminalization of significant influence in the enforcement of criminal law. SC and the CC differ in their patterns and the supervision of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. SC and the CC different in terms of a court decision is final and binding. The SC decision, are not the first and last because is final and binding and there is also not final but is already binding. There are differences of transparency in the legislation review in the SC and the CC. Keywords: The Rule of Law, Attribution Power, Judicial Power, Justice.
PERBANDINGAN ANTARA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI PELAKU KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA HANDOKO, DUWI
Menara Ilmu Vol 11, No 74 (2017): Vol. XI Jilid 1 No. 74, Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v11i74.72

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 confirms that Indonesia is a country of law. The one important principle of state of law is the guarantee of the implementation of independent judicial power, free from the influence of other powers to organize judiciary to enforce the law and justice. This study is based on the curiosity of investigators in uncovering the scope and existence of judicial power in Indonesia. The scope and existence were restricted to two state institutions in the field of the judiciary, the Supreme Court (SC) and the Constitutional Court (CC). Therefore, this study aims to identify and analyze the comparison (similarities and differences) between the authority of the SC and the CC. This study views of its kind is a normative legal research. While the views of nature, descriptive study. SC and the CC have the same authority to be a court decision that is both first and last. SC and the CC provides access to people who can not afford as the recipient of legal aid to be able to act. SC have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, while the CC, does not have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, but the CC decision related to the decriminalization of significant influence in the enforcement of criminal law. SC and the CC differ in their patterns and the supervision of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. SC and the CC different in terms of a court decision is final and binding. The SC decision, are not the first and last because is final and binding and there is also not final but is already binding. There are differences of transparency in the legislation review in the SC and the CC. Keywords: The Rule of Law, Attribution Power, Judicial Power, Justice.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM TENTANG REGULASI KEJAHATAN TANPA KORBAN DI KAWASAN ASIA Handoko, Duwi; Sukri, Beni
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.281

Abstract

Victimless crime is an important thing to know, both in terms of aspects related to crime patterns and imposition of sanctions against violator. The reason is that it is not appropriate to punish someone who does not harm others.In a discussion that the author does, it is not appropriate if someone is punished for having the potential to become a "criminal". An illustration of this can be read in this research. This research was conducted to reveal the comparison of the legal system (similarities and differences between Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law) related to crime without victims in the Asian region. To achieve these objectives, the research method applied is normative legal research with the nature of descriptive research. The equation of the Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law systems related to the regulation of crime without victims in the Asian region is only an aspect of prohibiting illegal drug users. Whereas the differences are: In the context of gambling players: Indonesia, which implements Civil Law and Saudi Arabia that apply Islamic Law, expressly prohibits every citizen to play gambling, both in the real world and in cyberspace. Whereas in Malaysia, which applies a dual legal system (Islamic Law and Common Law), gambling is a limited legal act. What is that? And how is the comparison in the context of prostitution and narcotics users? The answer can be known from the results of this research.
Politik Hukum Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi di Bidang Hak Cipta Duwi Handoko
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2019): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.99-122

Abstract

Substansi Undang-Undang Hak Cipta di Indonesia, meliputi aspek hukum privat dan hukum publik. Dalam tulisan ini, hanya dikaji unsur hukum publik, khususnya terkait kriminalisasi dan dekriminalisasi. Penelitian ini dilandasi oleh keingintahuan dalam mengungkap dasar pemikiran kriminalisasi dan dekriminalisasi untuk mencapai tujuan, yaitu setiap orang harus mengetahui batasan-batasan terhadap suatu perbuatan yang dapat dipidana. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah secara kualitatif dengan alat pengumpul data berupa studi kepustakaan. Kriminalisasi dan dekriminalisasi di bidang hak cipta adalah bagian dari Politik Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Dasar pemikiran proses kriminalisasi dapat ditinjau dari dua aspek, yaitu kriminalisasi murni dan bukan kriminalisasi murni. Dasar pemikiran proses dekriminalisasi adalah pidana tidak dijatuhkan atas perbuatan pelanggaran hak cipta yang tidak memiliki kepentingan secara komersial. Pemerintah hendaknya secara terus menerus memberikan edukasi kepada pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta dalam menyikapi delik aduan di bidang hak cipta. Pencipta hendaknya terus berkarya dan memahami bahwa tidak semua pelanggaran hak cipta dapat dinyatakan sebagai kejahatan dan terhadap pelakunya disebut penjahat. Hal itu karena ada legalisasi terhadap pelanggaran itu sendiri.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM TENTANG REGULASI KEJAHATAN TANPA KORBAN DI KAWASAN ASIA Duwi Handoko; Beni Sukri
Ensiklopedia Social Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.281

Abstract

Victimless crime is an important thing to know, both in terms of aspects related to crime patterns and imposition of sanctions against violator. The reason is that it is not appropriate to punish someone who does not harm others.In a discussion that the author does, it is not appropriate if someone is punished for having the potential to become a "criminal". An illustration of this can be read in this research. This research was conducted to reveal the comparison of the legal system (similarities and differences between Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law) related to crime without victims in the Asian region. To achieve these objectives, the research method applied is normative legal research with the nature of descriptive research. The equation of the Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law systems related to the regulation of crime without victims in the Asian region is only an aspect of prohibiting illegal drug users. Whereas the differences are: In the context of gambling players: Indonesia, which implements Civil Law and Saudi Arabia that apply Islamic Law, expressly prohibits every citizen to play gambling, both in the real world and in cyberspace. Whereas in Malaysia, which applies a dual legal system (Islamic Law and Common Law), gambling is a limited legal act. What is that? And how is the comparison in the context of prostitution and narcotics users? The answer can be known from the results of this research.
Kajian Terhadap Hak atas Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan serta Hak atas Pekerjaan Duwi Handoko
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v3i1.987

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the freedom to embrace religion and belief and fulfill the right to work in Indonesia. This type of research is normative legal research specifically discussing human rights in the field of religion and work. Regulation on the role and sanction for the government in the context of guaranteeing religious freedom, especially for Muslims, is very important. One form of legal vacuum in the regulation of religious freedom in Indonesia is in the context of the release of someone from Islam who aims to save humanity (of course also for other religions in Indonesia) and embrace other religions of his own free will. Regulations regarding the role and sanctions for the government in the context of guaranteed rights to obtain decent jobs, especially at productive age, are very important. Technically, it is clearly impossible for employers to recruit workers if there are no jobs in accordance with the capacity of the company's needs. From this, it can be said that the fulfillment of the right to work has a correlation with other types of rights so that a worker can have competence. The amount of unemployment that cannot be reduced by the Indonesian government and discriminatory treatment is a form of violation of the right to work.
SEJARAH PEMBENTUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Rustam Rustam; Tat Marlina; Duwi Handoko
JURNAL DIMENSI Vol 11, No 2 (2022): JURNAL DIMENSI (JULI 2022)
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/dms.v11i2.3973

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui ide constitutional review untuk pertama kalinya, tokoh yang berperan terhadap ide judicial review, dan format constitutional review di Indonesia pada saat ini. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang khusus membahas tentang politik hukum judicial review di Indonesia. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara sistematis berdasarkan rumusan masalah dan diuraikan secara kualitatif. Ide constitutional review (dalam format judicial review) untuk pertama kali diterapkan di Amerika Serikat. Tokoh yang berperan terhadap ide judicial review adalah Hans Kelsen, pakar hukum asal Austria.  Format constitutional review di Indonesia saat ini adalah tunggal, yaitu menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam bentuk judicial review.  
PERKEMBANGAN POLITIK HUKUM PRAPERADILAN DI INDONESIA Duwi Handoko; Rustam Rustam; Tat Marlina
JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Oktober 2021, Jurnal Trias Politika
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/jtp.v5i2.3577

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui perkembangan kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia dan organ negara manakah yang berperan dominan dalam menetapkan perubahan terhadap kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia pada saat ini. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang khusus membahas tentang politik hukum praperadilan di Indonesia. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara sistematis berdasarkan rumusan masalah dan diuraikan secara kualitatif. Perkembangan kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia diawali dengan menambah kewenangan praperadilan sampai dengan kewenangan penyidik untuk bisa menetapkan kembali subjek hukum (orang dan/atau badan hukum) sebagai tersangka dengan alat bukti yang sama. Selanjutnya, organ negara yang berperan dominan dalam menetapkan perubahan terhadap kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia pada saat ini adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang ditinjau dari aspek kekuasaan organ negara berada pada cabang kekuasaan yudikatif (bukan eksekutif bahkan legislatif). Hanya saja, produk hukum yang ditetapkan oleh MK tersebut lebih bersifat membentuk peraturan perundang-undangan yang merupakan kewenangan dari organ negara legislatif dan eksekutif.
Klasifikasi Dekriminalisasi dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Duwi Handoko
Jurnal HAM Vol 10, No 2 (2019): Edisi Desember
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.058 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2019.10.145-160

Abstract

Penelitian ini memfokuskan kajian mengenai periodisasi dan klasifikasi dekriminalisasi terhadap pasal-pasal dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dengan teknik pengumpulan data secara studi kepustakaan. Jenis data yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang disajikan secara kualitatif. Dekriminalisasi terhadap delik-delik dalam KUHP pada periode setelah reformasi memiliki perbedaan yang sangat signifikan dengan dekriminalisasi pada periode sebelum reformasi. Setelah reformasi, dibentuk lembaga yang berwenang melakukan dekriminalisasi terhadap delik, baik delik yang terdapat di dalam KUHP maupun delik yang terdapat di luar KUHP. Terdapat empat klasifikasi dekriminalisasi dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia, yaitu dekriminalisasi bukan murni, dekriminalisasi murni, dekriminalisasi murni sebahagian, dan dekriminalisasi bersyarat. Bukan murni berarti suatu delik masih tetap berlaku dan memiliki kekuatan hukum (legal). Murni berarti suatu delik sudah tidak berlaku dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum (tidak legal atau tidak sah). Murni sebahagian berarti suatu delik masih tetap berlaku dan tetap memiliki kekuatan hukum (legal atau sah) terhadap unsur perbuatan pidana yang masih berlaku. Bersyarat berarti menegaskan syarat tertentu dalam hal berlakunya suatu delik secara legal
KETENTUAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM TERHADAP PELAKU MURTAD DIKAITKAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA Duwi Handoko; Martha Hasanah Rustam
Jurnal Hukum Respublica Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Respublica
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/respublica.v21i2.8320

Abstract

Konsep masuk agama Islam tidak ada pemaksaan tetapi keluar dari agama Islam terdapat hukuman bagi pelakunya pada hakikatnya adalah suatu penyampaian Rasulullah kepada umat manusia yang diperintahkan oleh Allah SWT Yang Maha Melihat akan hamba-hamba- Nya. Barangsiapa yang masuk Islam, sesungguhnya mereka telah mendapat petunjuk dan barangsiapa yang murtad, maka kelak Allah akan mendatangkan suatu kaum yang Allah mencintai mereka dan merekapun mencintai-Nya, yang bersikap lemah lembut terhadap orang yang mukmin, yang bersikap keras terhadap orang-orang kafir, yang berjihad di jalan Allah, dan yang tidak takut kepada celaan orang yang suka mencela. Pengaturan pidana terhadap murtad dalam hukum pidana Islam adalah harus dibunuh setelah melewati tenggang waktu penasehatan dan eksekusi dilaksanakan oleh pihak berwenang, yakni atas perintah hakim. Sedangkan dalam hukum pidana positif di Indonesia, yang belum menerapkan hukum pidana Islam, maka orang murtad tidak dibunuh. Ketentuan hukum pidana Islam terhadap pelaku murtad dikaitkan dengan hak asasi manusia berdasarkan hukum positif Indonesia tentunya sesuatu hal yang tidak mungkin dilakukan saat ini.
Co-Authors ASRIL, FERRY Astina Astina, Astina Beni Sukri Beni Sukri Ferry Asril Hamler Hamler Hulaimi Irfan Ardiansyah Irfan Ardiansyah Khairul Azwar Anas Lewiaro Laia Lewiaro Laila Marlina, Tat Maulidi Maulidi Meidizon Rahmad Alamsyah Rahmad Alamsyah Riadi Asra Rahmad Rustam Rustam Rustam Rustam Sukri, Beni Tat Marlina Tat Marlina Tat Marlina Tat Marlina