Mochammad Bakri, Mochammad
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMBERDAYAAN UMKM DAN LEMBAGA KEUANGAN SYARIAH MELALUI PRINSIP BAGI HASIL Bhakti, Rizki Tri Anugrah; Bakri, Mochammad; Hamidah, Siti
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 5, No 1: Juni 2013
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (446.157 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v5i1.2990

Abstract

This article describes the micro, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which has high ability  to  absorb  labor  market,  as  many  as  97.3%  from  the  total  labor  force  working. However,  the  role  of  micro,  small  and  medium  enterprises  (SMEs)  in  the  reality  have difficulties in some factors, one of the factor is capital issues. This is where Syariah financial institution  with  the  profit  sharing  principal  to  be  expected  become  ideal  solution,  this because on the financing use the profit sharing principal. Observing phenomenon as above it is necessary to have assessment on few point area, first, implementation of financing on Syariah financial institution in the Malang City perceived become ideal solutions. Second, the factors which become the barrier on implementation of financing on Syariah financial institution in Malang City. Third; the right solution to overcome the barrier factors on the implementation at Shariah financial institution in Malang City concerning exact profit sharing principal. Artikel ini membahas tentang kemampuan usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah (UMKM) dalam menyerap tenaga kerja di Indonesia yang cukup besar, yaitu sebanyak 97,3% dari total angkatan kerja yang bekerja. Namun peran tersebut dalam kenyataannya terkendala oleh beberapa hal, diantaranya permasalahan modal. Disinilah peran Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah dengan pembiayaan berprinsip bagi hasil sangat diharapkan. Mengamati fenomena yang demikian maka perlu dikaji mengenai beberapa hal; pertama, pelaksanaan pembiayaan pada Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah di kota Malang yang dirasa ideal bagi usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah (UMKM). Kedua, faktor-faktor penghambat pelaksanaan pembiayaan pada Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah di Kota Malang berkenaan dengan prinsip bagi hasil, dan ketiga,  solusi  untuk  mengatasi  faktor-faktor  penghambat  pelaksanaan  pembiayaan  pada Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah di Kota Malang berkenaan dengan prinsip bagi hasil yang ideal tersebut.
THE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC ECONOMY IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDONESIA Hamidah, Siti; Bakri, Mochammad; Budiono, Abdul Rahmad; Winarno, Bambang
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (214.505 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01.03

Abstract

The development of Islamic Economy has been flourishing in the life of Indonesian people and brings impacts to several aspects of life, including in the field of law serving as the juridical basis. Indonesia is not an Islamic country. Instead, it is a constitutional country that believes in one Supreme God and protects all people to practice their religions. The sociological condition of the majority affects the formulation of law and constributes to the positive law which includes in it the issue on constitutional law.This paper analyzes the flexibility of Indonesian’s constitution in adopting and providing spaces for Islamic Economy as well as becoming the foundation for Islamic economy to fulfill the need of the society. Firstly, the analysis was conducted using theoretical approach viewed from the persepctive of the correlation between the state and religion, and the theory on legal pluralism. Further, the 1945 Constitution of State of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia/UUD NRI 1945), was analyzed to trace the basis of Islamic economy and to develop Islamic economy based on the Indonesian’s constitution.
Implementasi Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 pada Putusan Hakim dalam Pemberian Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik Larasati, Fadhila Restyana; Bakri, Mochammad
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (408.61 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk15410

Abstract

Dalam melindungi pihak yang beritikad baik dalam suatu perjanjian maka dibutuhkan peraturan yang dapat memberikan kepastian hukum. Pada tahun 2016 Mahkamah Agung melakukan rapat pleno dan menerbitkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2016, yang memberikan rumusan mengenai kriteria pembeli yang beritikad baik dalam pembelian tanah. Dalam penelitian ini mengkaji mengenai pertama, implementаsi Surаt Edаrаn Mаhkаmаh Аgung Nomor 4 Tаhun 2016 dаlаm putusаn-putusаn pengаdilаn. Kedua, pertimbаngаn hаkim dаlаm memutus perkаrа berkаitаn dengаn pembeli beritikаd bаik sudаh sesuаi dengаn perаturаn yаng berlаku. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pаdа prаktiknyа sepаnjаng putusаn yаng dikeluаrkаn setelаh terbitnyа SEMА Nomor 4 Tаhun 2016, dаlаm menggunаkаn SEMА sebаgаi dаsаr pertimbаngаn untuk menentukаn kriteriа pembeli beritikаd bаik, hаkim telаh melаkukаn sesuаi petunjuk yаng terterа dаlаm SEMА. Dаri kаsus-kаsus yang sudah diteliti, sаtu diаntаrаnyа telаh mendаsаrkаn pаdа SEMА No. 4 Tаhun 2016, lаlu putusаn yаng keduа mendаsаri pаdа SEMА yаng terbit sebelum SEMА No. 4 Tаhun 2016, dаn putusаn hаkim yаng ketigа tidаk menimbаng berdаsаrkаn SEMА. Sehinggа, pemberlаkuаn SEMА Nomor 4 Tаhun 2016 mаsih belum diikuti oleh pаrа hаkim, sebаgаi pedomаn dаlаm penаngаn perkаrа mengenаi juаl beli tаnаh yаng terjаdi setаlаh dikeluаrkаnnyа SEMА Nomor 4 Tаhun 2016.In protecting parties with good faith inside an agreement, regulations that provide legal certainty are needed. In 2016 the Supreme Court conducted a plenary meeting and issued a Letter of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 4 Year 2016, which provided the criteria of buyers with good intentions in purchasing land. In this study, we examine two things. The first is, the implementation of Letter of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 4 Year 2016 in court injunctions. The second, has the judge consideration followed applicable regulations in deciding the case related to buyer with good faith. The type of this study is normative study. The result of this study shows that practically the judge has followed the regulations in SEMA as the consideration material to determine the criteria of buyer with good intention since SEMA Number 4 Year 2016 was issued. From the cases examined, one of them took SEMA Number 4 Year 2016 into consideration, and then the second injunction took SEMA that issued before SEMA Number 4 Year 2016 into consideration, and the third injunction does not take SEMA into consideration. Thus, the enforcement of SEMA Number 4 Year 2016 is still not used by all the courts yet, as a consideration material in handling cases of land selling-purchasing since SEMA Number 4 Year 2016 issued.