Benny Afwadzi, Benny
UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Religio : Jurnal Studi Agama-agama

TEORI SEMIOTIKA KOMUNIKASI HADIS ALA UMBERTO ECO Afwadzi, Benny
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): DESEMBER
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (649.822 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.2.179-210

Abstract

This article tries to outline the semiotic theory of communication traditions (hadith). This theory is found when doing integration-author of the study interconnect traditions of the Prophet with the theory of communication semiotics Umberto Eco. Semiotic theory of communication traditions include the nine components in the communication process hadith, that source (the Prophet), message I (editorial authentic Prophet), the transmitter (the narrators of hadith), signal I (various editorial traditions verbally), channel (various books of hadith), signal II (various editorial traditions in writing), receiver (reason riwâyah hadith), message II (single editorial hadith), and destination (reason semiotic). Methods of understanding hadith contained in destination components that implement the method of unlimited semiotics to find the final logical interpreting. One more thing that is important here, that the stored channel noise (interference) communication in the form of transformation from spoken language into written language, which can result in distortion of meaning. 
Kritik Hadis dalam Perspektif Sejarawan Afwadzi, Benny
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol 7 No 1 (2017): JUNI
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (337.279 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.1.24-49

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate methodological investigation of ḥadîth criticism of the historians point of view. It also observes the salient differences between them and the scholars of ḥadîth, as both are often on different worldview. Through descriptive-analytical study, the author comes to the conclusion that there are at least two methods of ḥadîth criticism in historian perspective that are [1] critical in analysing the companions of the Prophet and [2] critical to the content (matn) of ḥadîth. By shifting paradigm framework, it suggests that both of them should not be rejected. Both perspectives should be used as a method to develop the tradition of ḥadîth criticism, although at some points, they have to be put on critical consideration. On the other side, the historian perspective might be useful to encourage the weaknesses which has been existed in conventional science of ḥadîth criticism.
KRITIK HADIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF SEJARAWAN Afwadzi, Benny
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017): JUNI
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (337.279 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.1.24-49

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate methodological investigation of ?adîth criticism of the historians point of view. It also observes the salient differences between them and the scholars of ?adîth, as both are often on different worldview. Through descriptive-analytical study, the author comes to the conclusion that there are at least two methods of ?adîth criticism in historian perspective that are [1] critical in analysing the companions of the Prophet and [2] critical to the content (matn) of ?adîth. By shifting paradigm framework, it suggests that both of them should not be rejected. Both perspectives should be used as a method to develop the tradition of ?adîth criticism, although at some points, they have to be put on critical consideration. On the other side, the historian perspective might be useful to encourage the weaknesses which has been existed in conventional science of ?adîth criticism.