Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Budi Suhariyanto, Budi
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA-RI
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agung Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.155 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1318

Abstract

Normatively constitutional court and supreme of court has on equal position with a different authority. However, there is a relationship of authority and point of contact. Morever, potential to cause disharmony on law enforcement. For example, on implementation of the constitutional court’s decision directly followed by the decision of the supreme court but some others not. The constitutional court’s decision characteristic are final and binding general (erga omnes), at the same level with legislation (negatif legislator), undirectly binding and enforced by the supreme court. Fundamentally, judge at the supreme court and the courts below is not a mouthpiece of the law, therefore it has some authority to interpre the statute (was also againts the decision of the constitutional court) to be applied on cases they handle. Although the judges decision of the supreme court do not decide on the validity and constitutionality of the norm, but through the efforts of the discovery  or the interpretation of the law can gives an effect to the law enforcement and the establishment of a progressive and responsive legal reform.
Urgensi Kriminalisasi Contempt of Court untuk Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.32 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk16110

Abstract

Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara telah mengatur mengenai mekanisme pelaksanaan putusan dengan menggunakan upaya paksa administratif dan perdata berupa pengenaan uang paksa. Pada praktiknya mekanisme ini kurang efektif karena masih ada Pejabat TUN yang tidak mau patuh melaksanakan putusan Pengadilan TUN. Perlu adanya kriminalisasi contempt of court terhadap Pejabat TUN yang melakukan pembangkangan tersebut karena dampaknya adalah terabaikannya hak konstitusional warga atas keadilan yang telah diputuskan oleh Pengadilan TUN. Dengan kriminalisasi ini maka dapat memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan terhadap rakyat atas kesewenang-wenangan Pejabat TUN. RUU Contempt of Court telah memasukkan ancaman pidana bagi para pihak yang tidak mau mematuhi putusan pengadilan. Secara fundamental yang dilindungi dari kriminalisasi ini adalah kepentingan keadilan dan eksistensi Negara hukum Indonesia.Law on State Administration has set regarding the enforcement mechanism by using administrative and civil forceful measures include the imposition of forced currency. In practice this mechanism is less effective because there are officials who do not want to obey implement the Court’s decision TUN. The need for the criminalization of contempt of court against officials who do disobedience TUN because its impact is the neglect of the constitutional rights of citizens to justice that have been decided by the Court of TUN. With this criminalization, it can provide legal certainty and the protection of the people over the arbitrariness of officials TUN. Contempt of Court Bill has included criminal sanctions for those who fail to comply with the court ruling. Fundamentally protected from criminalization of this is in the interests of justice and the existence of the laws of Indonesia.
Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agung Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.155 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1318

Abstract

Normatively constitutional court and supreme of court has on equal position with a different authority. However, there is a relationship of authority and point of contact. Morever, potential to cause disharmony on law enforcement. For example, on implementation of the constitutional court’s decision directly followed by the decision of the supreme court but some others not. The constitutional court’s decision characteristic are final and binding general (erga omnes), at the same level with legislation (negatif legislator), undirectly binding and enforced by the supreme court. Fundamentally, judge at the supreme court and the courts below is not a mouthpiece of the law, therefore it has some authority to interpre the statute (was also againts the decision of the constitutional court) to be applied on cases they handle. Although the judges decision of the supreme court do not decide on the validity and constitutionality of the norm, but through the efforts of the discovery  or the interpretation of the law can gives an effect to the law enforcement and the establishment of a progressive and responsive legal reform.
Co-Authors