Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceeding SENDI_U Tadulako Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review Pagaruyuang Law Journal AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Sri Susyanti Nur, Sri Susyanti
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
POLA PENGUASAAN DAN PEMANFAATAN WILAYAH PERAIRAN PESISIR SECARA TURUN-TEMURUN OLEH SUKU BAJO Nur, Sri Susyanti
Proceeding SENDI_U 2015: SEMINAR NASIONAL MULTI DISIPLIN DAN CALL FOR PAPERS
Publisher : Proceeding SENDI_U

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (116.998 KB)

Abstract

Pola Penguasaan dan Pemanfaatan Perairan Pesisir secara turun-temurun oleh suku Bajo,dimaksudkan adalah bagaimana suku Bajo yang tinggal bermukim di atas air menguasai wilayahperairan sebagai lahan pencariannya (nelayan penangkap ikan), sebagai tempat tinggal(permukiman), dan bagaimana nilai-nilai local yang diterapkan secara turun-temurun dalampemanfaatan wilayah perairan.Suku Bajo mendiami wilayah perairan pesisir di beberapa desa diKabupaten Muna Sulawesi Tenggara, dan di wilayah Bone Sulawesi Selatan menjadi lokasipenelitian, menggunakan metode survey dengan pendekatan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasilpenelitian menunjukan bahwa: Pola Penguasaan dan Pemanfaatan Perairan Pesisir oleh suku Bajosecara turun-temurun mempunyai kesamaan, yakni: 1) memandang laut sebagai milik leluhur yangmemberikan kehidupan (konsep common proverty); 2) dalam pemanfaatannya ditandai denganupacara rirual, izin Kepala Adat, dan berlakunya aturan-aturan tidak tertulis terkait denganpenggunaan alat tangkap ikan yang sederhana dan ramah lingkungan.
THE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR REAL LAND RIGHT HOLDER IN CASE OF FORGED RINCIK Nirwana, Nirwana; Patittingi, Farida; Nur, Sri Susyanti
Tadulako Law Review Vol 2, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal Protection For Real Land Right Holder in Case of Forged Rincik. The research aimed to investigate (1) the legal protection for the land owner whose possession was based on rincik evidence, and (2) the legal protection on the good-will buyer based on the forged rincik document used in the land sale transaction. This was the normative legal research, also called the library research or documentary study because the research was only conducted on the written regulations or other legal materials or secondary data consisting of the primary and secondary legal materials. The interview was performed to strengthen the theories and opinions in the research. The research also used the Secondary data. the data were analysed and presented using the qualitative descriptive method. The research result indicate that: (1) the real land owner with rincik possession issued after the year 1960 based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court No. 560K / PID / 2008 has not been fully protected due to the fact that the seller is funished for forging the rincik., returning the right to the land owner can not be carried out due to the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482 / PK / Pdt / 2014 which make the buyer win, while the real land owner is the directed to sue the land seller to give the compensation: and (2) the legal protection on the good faith buyer based on forget rincik in the land sale transaction has been fully protected and has the ringt to possess the land based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482/PK/Pdt/2014 because the buyer has bought the land in the presence of Temporary Land Title Registar.
Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah Bekas Milik Asing sebagai Aset Pemerintah Daerah Nur, Sri Susyanti
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (780.676 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v1i1.42

Abstract

Tanah sebagai aset pemerintah dapat berasal dari tanah-tanah bekas milik asing yang berasal dari tanah-tanah milik Cina dan perusahaan-perusahaan Belanda. Tanah sebagai aset pemerintah daerah diakui setelah dilakukan pendaftaran tanah/bersertifikat. Dalam penguasaan, pemanfaatan, dan pengelolaannya oleh instansi pemerintah haruslah berdasarkan pada Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 17 Tahun 2007 tentang Petunjuk teknis Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah (BMD) agar memberikan manfaat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum tanah aset daerah di kota Makassar yang berasal dari kepemilikan asing (Cina dan Belanda) ada yang telah berstatus Tanah Hak namun masih ada pula yang berstatus Tanah Negara/belum bersertifikat, disebabkan kendala pensertifikatan tanah aset daerah bekas milik asing Cina dan Belanda dari aspek peraturan perundang-undangan dan aspek administrasi.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak atas Tanah Sesungguhnya dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Menggunakan Rincik Palsu Nirwana, Nirwana; Patittingi, Farida; Nur, Sri Susyanti
Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, JANUARI 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal Protection For Real Land Right Holder in Case of Forged Rincik. The research aimed to investigate (1) the legal protection for the land owner whose possession was based on rincik evidence, and (2) the legal protection on the good-will buyer based on the forged rincik document used in the land sale transaction. This was the normative legal research, also called the library research or documentary study because the research was only conducted on the written regulations or other legal materials or secondary data consisting of the primary and secondary legal materials.  The research also used the Secondary data. the data were analysed and presented using the qualitative descriptive method. The research result indicate that: (1) the real land owner with rincik possession issued after the year 1960 based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court No. 560K / PID / 2008 has not been fully protected due to the fact that the seller is funished for forging the rincik., returning the right to the land owner can not be carried out due to the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482 / PK / Pdt / 2014 which make the buyer win, while the real land owner is the directed to sue the land seller to give the compensation: and (2) the legal protection on the good- willing buyer based on forget rincik in the land sale transaction has been fully protected and has the ringt to possess the land based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482/PK/Pdt/2014 because the buyer has bought the land in the presence of Temporary Land Title Registar.
Pembebanan Pajak Penghasilan pada Pendaftaran Tanah untuk Pertama Kali Erviana, Irma; Aspan, Zulkifli; Nur, Sri Susyanti
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i1.88

Abstract

This study aims to determine the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings on land registration for the first time. This research was conducted using empirical legal research methods with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and literature. In addition, this research uses the descriptive analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings on land registration for the first time is not a requirement for applicants for rights related to land registration for the first time. However, the Bone Regency Land Office requires proof of payment of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to the applicant during the land registration application for the first time. Thus, the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to the applicant regarding land registration for the first time at the Bone Regency Land Office is considered contrary to Article 4 section (1) of Law No. 36 of 2008 jo. Article 4 section (1) Government Regulations No. 34 of 2016. Therefore, it is hoped that the Head of the Bone Regency Land Office will abolish the requirement for the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to applicants for rights related to land registration for the first time. Apart from that, eliminating these requirements also avoids the imposition of inappropriate or on target taxes to uphold aspects of justice and legal certainty (the principle of certainty).
Jual Beli di Bawah Tangan yang dilakukan oleh Kepala Adat Atas Tanah Petuanan Saputan, Robert Lowell; Pide, A. Suryaman Mustari; Nur, Sri Susyanti
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i1.89

Abstract

This study aims to determine legal certainty and protection against buying and selling that is not under state regulations carried out by Customary Heads on customary land. This research was conducted using empirical legal research methods with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. They are collecting data in this study using field research techniques and literature research techniques. The data obtained, both primary and secondary data, were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that customary land could only be managed, owned, and in principle can be handed over or sold to fellow indigenous and tribal peoples’. As for buying and selling of customary land, it must be proven by a letter of relinquishment of rights and a certificate issued by the Customary Head. In addition, for those who are not indigenous and tribal peoples’, if the material requirements of the legal relationship of buying and selling of land have been fulfilled, the buying and selling of customary land carried out by the Customary Head as based on customary law procedures is considered valid. This letter is the proof of ownership recognized by indigenous and tribal peoples’ in Ambon City, even though the letter is an inauthentic deed. On the other hand, a letter of relinquishment of rights and a certificate issued by the Customary Head are among the documents required by the Ambon City National Land Agency to register land title certificates. Therefore, the National Land Agency needs to raise legal awareness for customary land buyers. As for the party who buys customary land, it is necessary to follow up at the Land Office to immediately register the title of title to land to reduce the risk of overlapping ownership and even disputes over customary land.
Co-Authors Erviana, Irma Nirwana, Nirwana Nirwana, Nirwana Patittingi, Farida Pide, A. Suryaman Mustari Salle, Aminuddin Saputan, Robert Lowell Siregar, Manto Zulkifli Aspan, Zulkifli