Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

KAJI EKSPERIMENTAL PENGARUH VARIASI DIAMETER NOZZEL DAN JUMLAH SUDU TERHADAP DAYA DAN EFFISIENSI PADA PROTOTYPE TURBIN PELTON DI LAB. FLUIDA ., Supardi; Ridwan, Moh.
MEKANIKA: Jurnal Teknik Mesin Vol 1 No 01 (2015): July
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12345/jm.v1i01.755

Abstract

Review of experimental effect of variations in the diameter of the nozzle and the amount of bucket on thepower and the efficiency on prototype pelton turbine in the Lab. Fluid. The aim of this study wants to know the effectof variations in the diameter of the nozzle and amount of the bucket to the power and efficiency of the existing peltonturbine prototype in the laboratory Fluid in the Pico-hydro scale. The steps in this research include the study ofliterature and field studies, designing, manufacturing of test equipment, testing, data analysis, and conclusions.Variation is done using nozzle diameter (dn) 6 mm and 9 mm, β2 at 165o, amount of bucket (Z) 12 units, 17 units,and 22 units. For the runner has a large diameter of 150 mm, while for the power plants or generators using spooland magnet on motorcycles. Results of this testing is the largest input power (Pin) at d 6 mm with a value of 46.81watts. The largest turbine power (Pt) and turbine efficiency (ηt) at dnn = 6 mm with Z = 12 unit with value P= 40,34watt and ηt =86,18 watt. The largest generator power (Pgen) at d = 6 mm with Z = 22 unit with value 9,6 watt,meanwhile for the largest generator efficiency (ηgenn) and the largest efficiency system (ηsis) at d= 9 mm with Z = 22unit with value ηgen = 54,24 % and η= 25,82 %.Keywords: Pelton Turbine, Bucket, Nozzle, Power and Efficiency
Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Rubaie, Ach.; Nurjaya, Nyoman; Ridwan, Moh.; Istislam, Istislam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1009.019 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict  was:(a)  philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live  in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita  basically acceptable, all associated  to  the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law,  the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.
Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Rubaie, Ach.; Nurjaya, Nyoman; Ridwan, Moh.; Istislam, Istislam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1009.019 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict  was:(a)  philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live  in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita  basically acceptable, all associated  to  the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law,  the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.
Analisis Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun Tentang Cerai Talak Safiudin, Achmad; Nashukha, Nimatun; Alfarizi, Ednick; Nasada, A. M. Imam Fadhil; Ridwan, Moh.
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022): Februari 2022
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v3i01.122

Abstract

Abstract: Divorce is something that should be avoided in marriage.  However, if there are problems in the household that cannot be resolved then divorce is the best solution by filing for divorce or divorce to the Religious Court.  This article discusses the decision of the Madiun District Religious Court Number 1092/Pdt.G/2021/PA. Kab.Mn about divorce. The method used in this verdict analysis research is a normative legal method and uses an invitation-to-ceiling approach. In his ruling, the judge granted the petitioner's divorce application based on the provisions of Article 19 letter (F) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 jo. Article 116 letter (F) Compilation of Islamic Law, namely the existence of disputes and continuous quarrels, there is no longer any hope of getting back together and has separated residences for quite a long time. In Islamic law, the decision is appropriate because the purpose of marriage is to foster a sakinah family, mawaddah wa rahmah. If there is no peace in the family, divorce is allowed.  Advice for the Religious Court that accepts this case, is to always provide justice in accordance with the law and legal certainty that applies. Keywords: Divorce, Judge's Decision, Compilation of Islamic Law Abstrak: Perceraian merupakan hal yang harus dihindari dalam suatu pernikahan. Namun, jika terjadi masalah dalam rumah tangga yang tidak bisa diselesaikan maka perceraian merupakan solusi yang terbaik dengan mengajukan cerai talak atau cerai gugat ke Pengadilan Agama. Artikel ini membahas mengenai putusan Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun Nomor 1092/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kab.Mn mengenai cerai talak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian analisis putusan ini yaitu metode hukum normatif dan juga menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dalam putusannya, hakim mengabulkan permohonan cerai talak pemohon dengan berpedoman pada ketentuan Pasal 19 huruf (F) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 jo. Pasal 116 huruf (F) Kompilasi Hukum Islam, yaitu adanya perselisihan dan pertengkaran terus menerus, tidak ada lagi harapan untuk kembali rukun dan telah berpisah tempat tinggal cukup lama. Dalam hukum Islam, keputusan tersebut sudah sesuai  karena tujuan perkawinan adalah membina keluarga yang sakinah, mawaddah wa rahmah. Jika sudah tidak ada kedamaian dalam keluarga maka perceraian merupakan hal yang diperbolehkan. Saran untuk Pengadilan Agama yang menerima perkara ini, agar tetap selalu memberikan suatu keadilan yang sesuai dengan undang-undang dan kepastian hukum yang berlaku. Kata Kunci: Cerai Talak, Putusan Hakim, Kompilasi Hukum Islam