<![CDATA[The method of research use experiment with a comparative approach. This research was conducted in SMP Muhammadiyah Tulang Bawang Tengah. The conclusions of this research were: 1) there is an interaction between learning models and learning styles by improving physics student learning outcomes with sig 0.000 <0.05 (2) there is a difference in an average of increasing physics learning outcomes, its learning with learning model based on problem (84,76) is higher than the guided inquiry learning (77,2). (3) there is difference in an average of increasing physics learning outcomes, students who have a visual learning style, guided inquiry learning model (73,36) <based on problem (90,18), auditory learning style using guided inquiry learning model (84,27 ) > based on problem (77,73), and kinesthetic learning style using guided inquiry learning model (72,15) < based on problem (89,12).Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket dan tes. Data dianalisis dengan anava dan uji-t. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah: 1) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dengan peningkatan hasil belajar fisika siswa dengan nilai sig 0,000 < 0,05 (2) terdapat perbedaan peningkatan rata-rata hasil belajar fisika, pembelajaranya dengan model belajar berbasis masalah (84,76) lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran inquiri terbimbing (77,52). (3) terdapat perbedaan peningkatan rata-rata hasil belajar fisika, siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing (73,36) < berbasis masalah (90,18), gaya belajar auditorial menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing (84,27) > berbasis masalah (77,73), dan gaya belajar kinestetik menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing (72,15) < berbasis masalah (89,12). Kata kunci: hasil belajar, model inkuiri terbimbing, model berbasis masalah]]>
