Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, GROUP INVESTIGATION, DAN THINK TALK WRITE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA Nuraya, Naufalia; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.077 KB)

Abstract: This research aims to know the different effect among learning models used i.e, Discovery Learning (DL) with scientific approach, Group Investigation (GI) with scientific approach, and Think Talk Write (TTW) with scientific approach. The research method was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of district Tegal year of 2014/2015. Sample was taken by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used two way MANOVA with unbalanced cell. The results of the research were as follows: (1) a. Learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning achievement of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. Mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (2) a. Learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. Mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; (3) a. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, mathematics learning creativity of students treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of students treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (4) a. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability.Keywords: DL, GI, TTW, Scientific Approach, Reasoning Ability, Learning Achievement, Mathematics Learning Creativity.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE PAIRS CHECK (PC), THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Irawati, Suci; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (315.146 KB)

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the studentsâ Learning Style. The learning models compared were learning model Pairs Check (PC), Think Pair Share (TPS) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3Ã3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Surakarta. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were achievement test and questionnaire of learning styles. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of research showed as follows. (1) The PC resulted better learning achievement than the TPS and PBL. TPS resulted learning achievement as good as PBL, (2) The students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than did those having auditorial learning style. The students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than Â those having kinesthetic learning style. The students having auditorial learning style resulted better learning achievement than those having kinesthetic learning style.Â (3) At the students having visual learning style, PC resulted better learning achievement than that TPS and PBL, TPS and PBL resulted the same learning achievement. At the students having auditorial learning style, PC and TPS resulted the same learning achievement, PC resulted better learning achievement than that PBL, TPS resulted better learning achievement than that PBL. At the students having auditorial learning style, PC, TPS and PBL resulted the same learning achievement, (4) In PC, the students having visual learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having auditorial learning style, the students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than did those having auditorial learning style, The students having auditorial learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having kinestetik learning style. In TPS and PBL, The students having visual learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having auditorial and kinestetik learning style.Keywords :Â Pairs Check (PC), Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Based Learning (PBL),Â Learning Style.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL), DAN PROBLEM POSSING (PP) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN DEMAK Lestari, Shanti Indah; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (303.007 KB)

Â Â Â Abstract: The objective of this research is to investigate the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were the PBL, DL, and PP models. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Demak. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The proposed hypotheses of research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of research are as follows. 1) The students instructed with the PBL model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the DL and PP models, and the students instructed with the DL model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the PP model. 2) The students with the logical-mathematical intelligence have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the visual and interpersonal intelligences, and the students with the visual intelligence have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the interpersonal intelligence. 3) In the students with the logical-mathematical and visual intelligences, the PBL model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the DL, the DL model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the PP model, and the PBL model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the PP model. In the students with the interpersonal intelligence, the PBL model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the DL, the DL model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the PP model, but the PBL model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the PP model. 4) In the PBL, DL , and PP models, the students with the logical-mathematical intelligence have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the visual intelligence, the students with the visual intelligence have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the interpersonal intelligence, and the students with the logical-mathematical intelligence have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the interpersonal intelligence.Keywords: Problem Based Learning (PBL), Discovery Learning (DL), Problem Possing (PP) and Multiple Intelligences.

KESULITAN METAKOGNISI SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN TIPOLOGI HIPPOCRATES â GALENUS KELAS XI MIA 1 SMA NEGERI I SOE Bulu, Vera Rosalina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (289.788 KB)

Abstract: The objective of research was to describe difficulty, cause, and solution to the difficulties the 11th MIA 1 Grades of SMA Negeri I Soe faced in using their metacognitive of ability to solve mathematics problem in probability material using melancholic, sanguinic, phlegmatic and choleric personality types. This study was an exploratory qualitative research. The procedure used of selecting subject is snowball sampling, so that 12 subjects were obtained whose data could be analyzed. The data collection was conducted using think aloud method. The data validation was carried out using time triangulation. Techniques of analyzing data used were: (1) classifying data into 4 categories: (a) understanding problem, (b) thinking about plan, (c) implementing the plan, (d) rechecking the answer, (2) presenting the data in narrative text and (3) drawing a conclusion about difficulty, cause, and solution to metacognitive difficulty in each category. The results of research showed that the metacognitive difficulties in solving problem of probability material for melancholic and choleric students were as follows. (a) The students difficulty realized strategic deliberation and the advantage of strategy used, (b) Students experience metacognitive difficulty in realizing the strategic change when they were wrong, (c) Difficulty in realizing the evaluation on confusion, (d) Difficulty in realizing when a strategy is used, (e) Difficulty in realizing the different strategies, (f) Difficulty of other strategy in problem solving, (g) Difficulty in realizing their work product evaluation, and (h) Difficulty in realizing the consideration of all options in solving problem. The difficulty of sanguinic and phlegmatic students were as follows. (a)Â Difficultly realized strategic deliberation and the advantage of strategy used, (b) Difficulty in realizing the advantage of strategy used (c) Difficulty realizing when a strategy was used (d) Difficulty in realizing when a strategy was used (d) Difficulty in realizing the reason of using different strategies inÂ various situation (e) Difficulty in realizing other strategy in solving problem and (f) Difficulty in realizing the deliberation of all options in solving problem.Keywords: Metacognitive Difficulty, Problem Solving, Hippocrates-Galenus Personality Type.Â

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE CO-OP CO-OP, DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN PBL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA Kurniawan, Wahyu; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (355.39 KB)

Abstract: This research aims to know the effect among learning models used cooperative learning of Co-op Co-op type with scientific approach, discovery learning (DL) with scientific approach, and Â the problem based learning (PBL) with scientific approach. The research method was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of district Ngawi Year of 2014/2015. Sampling was taken by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach was better than that of those treated with DL learning model with scientific approach and those treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach, while that of those treated with DL learning model with scientific approach was as good as that of those treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high learning creativity was better than that of those with medium and low ones, while that of those with medium was better than that of those with low one. (3) In Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the learning achievements of the students with high, medium and low learning creativities were the same. In DL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high learning creativity had mathematics learning achievement as good as those with those with medium one, while those with high and medium learning creativities had better learning achievement than those with low on. In PBL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high and low creativities had mathematics learning achievement as good as that of those with medium one, while the students with high learning creativity had better learning achievement than those with low one. (4) The students with high and medium learning creativities treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement as good as those treated with DL with scientific approach and those treated with PBL with scientific approach. The students with low learning creativity treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement better than those treated with DL with scientific approach, while those treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement with scientific approach and those treated with DL with scientific approach had learning achievement as good as that of those treated with PBL with scientific approach.Keywords: Co-op Co-op, DL, PBL, scientific approach, student learning creativity

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, THINK ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP Awaludin, Aulia Ar Rakhman; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.854 KB)

Abstract: This research aims to know the different effect among learning model used i.e. Problem Based Learning, Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving and Group Inverstigation models with scientific approach observed from students self concept and study creativity towards the ability of mathematics problem solving. This research used quasi experimental study with factorial design 3x2x3. The population of this research was the eighth grade student of State Junior High School of District Sragen Year of 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The data analysis used a three way analysis of variance with different cell at significance level of 0.05. The results of this research are : (1) PBL-S produces the same students ability of mathematics problem solving with TAPPS-S. Moreover, both produce the better students ability than GI-S. (2) Students with positive category of self concept produce the better ability of mathematics problem solving than students with negative category. (3) Students with high study creativity category produce the better ability of mathematics problem solving than the medium and low category. However, the students with medium and low study creativity category produce the same ability of mathematics problem solving. (4) In each learning models, both the students with positive and negative self concept have the same ability of mathematics problem solving. (5) In PBL-S and GI-S models, students with high, medium and low creativity have the same ability of mathematics problem solving. However, there is different ability between high and low creativity category in TAPPS-S model. (6) Students with positive and negative self concept have the same ability of mathematics problem solving in all study creativity categories (high, medium, low category). (7) At each learning models, students with positive and negative self concept and with high, medium and low creativity have the same ability of mathematics problem solving.Keywords : PBL, TAPPS, GI, Scientific Approach, Self Concept, Learning Creativity.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING SERTA MODEL THINK PAIR SHARE MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS TINGKAT TINGGI PESERTA DIDIK SMP Pawiro, Yudi Pramono; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (313.984 KB)

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the high order mathematical thinking skill viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were model of the PBL, model of the DL and model of the TPS. This research used the quasi experimental research. Itâs population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 253 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 87 in Experimental Class 1, 84 in Experimental Class 2, and 83 in Experimental Class 3. The instruments to gather the data were test of high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) Model of the PBL results in a better high order mathematical thinking skill than model of the DL, and Â model of the TPS. Model of the DL results same high order mathematical thinking skillÂ with TPS. 2) Emotional quotient gives students a different effect on high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam. The students with the high emotional quotient have a better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have a betterÂ high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the low emotional quotient. 3) There was no interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the high order mathematical thinking skill of the students.Keywords: PBL, DL, TPS, High Order Mathematical Thinking Skill and Emotional Quotient.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Pinahayu, EK Ajeng Rahmi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (439.854 KB)

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effects of Discovery Learning (DL), Problem Based Learning (PBL), and Think Pair Share (TPS) models with scientific approach towards students knowledge and social attitude competency viewed from the students learning styles. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The population of research was all of the 8th grade of the State Junior High School in Puworejo Regency on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The hypothesis testing of research were conducted using a two-ways multivariate analysis of variance with different cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, while PBL and TPS was same. (2) DL and TPS provided same social attitude competency, and both provided better social attitude competency than PBL. (3) The knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory and kinesthetic, and the knowledge competency of students in those types was same. (4) The social attitude competency of visual and auditory students was same, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (5) In DL, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the knowledge competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. In PBL and TPS, the knowledge competency of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students was same. (6) In DL and TPS, the social attitude competency of those three types was same. In PBL, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than auditory, the social attitude competency of visual and kinesthetic students was same, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (7) In visual, DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, PBL and TPS Â provided same knowledge competency. In auditory and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same knowledge competency. (8) In visual and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same social attitude competency. In auditory, DL and PBL provided same social attitude competency, DL and TPS was same, and TPS provided better social attitude competency than PBL.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Scientific Approach, Knowledge Competency, Social Attitude Competency, Learning Styles.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Putra P, Heldy Ramadhan; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (275.895 KB)

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one have better learning achievement, the students receiving TPS, those receiving GI or those receiving PBL learning models, (2) which one have better learning achievement, the students with high, those with medium or those with low spatial ability, (3) in each learning model, which one have better learning achievement, the students with high, those with medium or those with low spatial ability, and (4) in each spatial ability, which one have better learning achievement, the students receiving TPS, those receiving GI or those receiving PBL learning models. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 8th graders of Public Junior High School throughout Surakarta City. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement and spatial ability tests. Before used for data collection, the instruments of achievement and spatial ability tests were tried out first. Technique of analyzing data used was a two-way analysis of variance test with unbalancedÂ cells. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) PBL type of cooperative learning have better learning achievement than the GI and TPS types did, GI type have learning achievement as good as the TPS type did. (2) The students with high spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low spatial ability, while those with medium spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with low spatial ability. (3) In various learning models, the students with high spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low spatial ability, while those with medium spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with low spatial ability. (4) In each category of spatial ability, the students receiving PBL type of cooperative learning have better learning achievement than those receiving GI and TPS types did, those receiving GI type have learning achievement as good as those receiving TPS type did.Keywords: TPS, GI, PBL, Learning Achievement, Spatial Ability

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING, THINK ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING DAN STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS Dwiningsih, Pitra; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (317.109 KB)

Abstract: The objective of research was to find out the effect of learning model, (high, medium and low) logical mathematic intelligence, and interaction between learning model and logical mathematic intelligence on mathematic learning achievement. The learning models compared were CPS with scientific approach, Tapps with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach. This research was quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 7th graders of Junior High Schools in Karanganyar Regency in academic year of 2014/2015. Technique of analyzing data used in this research was a two-way variance analysis with different cell. Considering the hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The students subjected with the CPS learning model with scientific approach had a better learning achievement than students subjected by Tapps with scientific approach and STAD model with scientific approach, students subjected with the Tapps with scientific approach had better learning achievement than students subjected by STAD model with scientific approach; (2) In students with high logical mathematical intelligence gave the same learning the students with medium logical mathematical intelligence, students who had high and medium logical mathematical intelligence had a better learning achievement than students who had low logical mathematical intelligence; (3) The STAD and CPS learning models, students with high logical mathematical intelligence had a better learning achievement than students with medium and low logical mathematical intelligence, students with medium logical mathematical intelligence had the same learning achievement of students with low logical mathematical intelligence. The Tapps learning model, students with high and medium logical mathematical intelligence to had the same learning achievement, students with high and medium logical mathematical intelligence had a better learning achievement than students with low mathematical logical intelligence; (4) The students with high, medium and low logical mathematical intelligence subjected to CPS, Tapps and STAD learning models had the same learning achievement, but on the students with lower intelligence logical mathematical learning had subjected to model CPS had a better learning achievement than students who had subjected to STAD model.Keywords: Creative Problem Solving (CPS), Think Aloud Pair Problem Solving (Tapps), Division Achievement Student Team (STAD), Scientific Approach and Logical Mathematic Intelligence.

Title

Found 31 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 31 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 31 Documents
Search