Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din
Tholkhatul Khoir, Tholkhatul
Fakultas Syariah UIN Walisongo Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Determinasi Eksistensial Pemikiran Hukum Islam Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im Khoir, Tholkhatul
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 9, No 1 (2014): Islamica
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (428.377 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2014.9.1.110-135

Abstract

This article deals with the Islamic legal thought of Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im from the sociology of knowledge approach. According to this approach, knowledge (including religious interpretation and practices) is sociologically, economically and politically determined. This article aims to understand how an-Na‘im’s Islamic legal thought is determined by his existence within social reality. This article concludes that an-Na‘im’s thought is determined by (1) socio-political and legal reality in Sudan, (2) Mahmoud Mohamed Taha who influenced his ideas, (3) British milieu, and (4) American environment which is politically secular, Islamo-phobic, racist, discriminative and intolerant towards Afro-Americans. The maturity of an-Na‘im’s thought is particularly influenced by the history of British colonialism in Sudan and his academic training in England, a place where human rights discourse develops as the result of post-enlightenment humanism and some major revolutions in Europe.
Titik Temu Pemikiran Mahmoud Mohamed Thaha dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im Khoir, Tholkhatul
International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din Vol 18, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (286.429 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ihya.17.1.1746

Abstract

Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na'im is deeply influenced by the Islamic Reform Movement in Sudan pioneered by Mahmoud Mohamed Taha. Together with other Taha supporters, an-Na'im formed a sociopolitical community that became famous for Tahaism. This article wants to show how the relationship of the two minds is so close and how Islamic legal thought of an-Na'im is partially influenced by Taha. In terms of historical research methodology, it can be said that Taha is a history of idea for an-Na'im. This is because the thought of an-Na'im turns out to be the same as Taha in terms of the importance of the naskh, and differs in worship, mysticism, socialism, and public reason. Moreover, the underlying power of the theorem an-Na'im is not merely an individual, not of individual processes aware of its importance in the flow of thought, but rather of the collective goals of a group that underlie individual thought. Most of his thoughts cannot be properly understood as long as their relation to life or to the social implications of human life are not taken into account.---Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im sangat terpengaruh oleh Gerakan Reformasi Islam di Sudan yang dipelopori oleh Mahmoud Mohamed Taha. Bersama sama dengan para pendukung Taha lainnya, an-Na‘im membentuk sebuah komunitas sosial politik yang kemudian terkenal dengan Tahaisme. Artikel ini ingin menunjukkan betapa hubungan pemikiran keduanya sangat dekat dan betapa pemikiran hukum Islam an-Na‘im sebagiannya dipengaruhi oleh Taha. Dalam istilah metodologi penelitian sejarah, dapat dikatakan bahwa Taha adalah history of idea bagi an-Na‘im. Hal ini karena pemikiran an-Na‘im ternyata sama dengan Taha dalam hal pentingnya naskh, dan berbeda dalam hal ibadah, tasawwuf, sosialisme, dan public reason. Selain itu, kekuatan yang mendasari sikap teoritis an-Na‘im bukan semata merupakan sesuatu yang individual semata, yakni tidak berasal dari proses individu menyadari kepentingannya dalam arus pemikiran, akan tetapi lebih berasal dari tujuan-tujuan kolektif suatu kelompok yang mendasari pemikiran individu. Sebagian besar pemikirannya tidak dapat dimengerti secara tepat selama kaitannya dengan kehidupan atau dengan implikasi sosial kehidupan manusia tidak diperhitungkan.
Co-Authors