Badrul Munir
Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

DANDY-WALKER VARIANT (DWV) IN 70 YEARS OLD WOMAN WITH DISEQUILIBRIUM AND CENTRAL VERTIGO : A CASE REPORT Ria Damayanti; Muhammad Welly Dafif; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan; Badrul Munir; Zamroni Afif
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (298.776 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.01.2

Abstract

Dandy Walker Syndrome (DWS) and its Variants (DWV) is a congenital disorder that has prevalence of 1 in 25,000 to 30,000 births with the highest incidence occurs at age <1 year. However, patients may be diagnosed with DWS/DWV for the first time in adolescence and even old age. We reported the 70-year-old woman with a chief complaint of central type vertigo accompanied by disequilbrium. From history taking we obtained disequilibrium with gradual onset started in nine months and become settled since the last 6 months before she came to the neurology clinic. The patient also complained vertigo that have emerged since the last 3 month. A history of head trauma, stroke, dementia was denied. Physical examinaton show central nystagmus while other cranial nerve within normal range. Motor, sensory and autonomic status within normal range. Romberg test, tandem walking, disdiadokokinesia, and dismetria examination shows abnormal respons. MMSE results for patients within normal range (score:26). Head MRI shows Dandy Walker Variant in the accompanied by cerebral atrophy and degeneration serebelli Fazekas grade I. Patients receive symptomatic therapy betahistine mesylate 3x6 mg if necessary. Surgery management is not indicated because there is no sign of hydrocephalus or signs of increased intracranial pressure.
COMPARATIVE OF INTRAARTICULAR INJECTION BETWEEN DEXTROSE PROLOTHERAPY VERSUS TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS Widodo Mardi Santoso; Andhy Indriyono; Badrul Munir; Alidha Nur Rakhmani; Machlusil Husna
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (292.991 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.1

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common cartilage degenerative disorders that is a major problem because it causes chronic pain and disability. Therefore the method of treatment and prevention of old age is a big challenge. The results of Dextrose Prolotherapy compared to Triamcinolone therapy research are still varied. Objective:  to  compare  the effectiveness  of  Dextrose  Prolotherapy  and  Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) in the treatment of moderate knee knee OA.True experimental single blind study, at the Neurology Polyclinic Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang for 6 months (July-December 2019). Group I; Dextrose Prolotherapy (15%) intraarticularly injected 3 times every 4 weeks and group II; TA one- time intraarticular injection. The parameters studied were The Western Ontario and McMaster  Universities  Osteoarthritis  Index  (WOMAC)  Score,  Numeric  Rating  Scale (NRS), and Range of Motion (ROM), weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24. Forty samples consisted of; the 20 samples of the Dextrose Prolotherapy group consisted of; male: female = 2 (10%): 18 (90%), age 62.4 + 7.28, BMI 25.6 + 3.69 kg / m2, pain duration 22.35 + 20.10 months, history of physiotherapy 40.27 + 20.79 times. Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 17 (85%), grade III 3 (15%). TA group; male: female = 5 (25%):15 (75%), age 62.5 + 9.02, BMI 28.4 + 5.01 kg/m2, pain duration 15.95 +  16.55  months,  history  of  physiotherapy  34  +  24.87  times.  Kellgren  –  Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 18 (90%), grade III; 2 (10%). Comparison of NRS at rest Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA of week 4 (2.60 vs 1.25), week 8 (1.65 vs 1.40), week 12 (0.8 vs 2.05), week 24 (0.75 vs 3.35). Comparison of NRS during activity Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (4.45 vs 3.35), week 8 (3.25 vs 3.55), week 12 (2.55 vs 4.30), week 24 (2.55 vs 5.80). Comparison of ROM flexion Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (127.05° vs 123.60°), week  8  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  12  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  24  (131.05°  vs 122.10°). Comparison of WOMAC score Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (30.05 vs 22.45), week 8 (22.90 vs 23.95), week 12 (19.30 vs 29.05), week 24 (18.95 vs 35.40). Intraarticular Injection Dextrose Prolotherapy is more effective for the long term based on pain scale NRS, WOMAC score and ROM. Whereas short-term TA is more effective than Dextrose Prolotherapy.
RADIOFREQUENCY AS PAIN INTERVENTIONAL THERAPY IN NEUROLOGY Badrul Munir; Widodo Mardi Santoso; Zamroni Afif; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (234.177 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.3

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) intervention uses high frequency alternating current (AC) to inhibit and alter nociceptive pathway in various locations. Radiofrequency is divided into Continuous RF (CRF) and Pulsed RF (PRF). Continuous RF is a process in which the RF current is used to produce thermal lesions on the target nerve that will result in resistance to the afferent nociceptive pathway. PRF is a process whereby short bursts of RF are discharged toward a neural target that will produce a signal for lowering pain. PRF is a therapy of neural tissue with small neurodestructive possibility and is an alternative technique for continuing RF. RF therapy is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used for about three decades to treat various chronic pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia, post herpes neuralgia, lower back pain (LBP), and complex regional pain syndromes or sympathetic reflex dystrophy. The mechanism action of the PRF involves cellular structure damage, neuronal activation, altered gene expression, a global continuation of evoked synaptic  activity in pain fibers through centrals and changes in synaptic strength and long-term potentiation.  PRF with its various characteristics has a better outcome than conventional RF.
LOW BACK PAIN Andaru Cahya S; Widodo Mardi Santoso; Machlusil Husna; Badrul Munir; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (499.777 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.01.4

Abstract

Low back pain is the most common symptom found in the primary health care and is the number one cause of disability throughout worldwide. It is estimated that around 60 – 80% the world population will experience back pain during their lifespan. There are three different source of pain in the spine: axial-lumbosacral, radicular and reffered pain. All of these source brings different clinical presentations. Low back pain could be classified as acute, subacute and chronic low back pain. The pain could be nociceptive or neuropathic, the most common symptoms reported are “pressure pain” and “pain attack”.  The physician should be aware of “red flags” symptoms that lead into more serious condition beside back pain and, therefore the patient has to be investigated to further examination whenever these symptoms present. The management of low back pain consist of severe modalities, both therapeutic and rehabilitative procedure. Oftentimes, the management needed multidisciplinary approach. It is important to general practitioners to identify and treat low back pain appropriately to reduce the burden of the disease and to prevent the disabilties caused by this condition.
MENIERE’S DISEASE Helena Era Millennie; Badrul Munir; Zamroni Afif; Ria Damayanti; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (492.36 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.01.5

Abstract

Meniere’s disease is a disorder of the inner ear resulting in symptoms of episodic vertigo, tinnitus, hearing loss and aural pressure. Although the exact etiology is uncertain, it is associated with raised pressure in the endolymph of the inner ear (endolymphatic hydrops). The diagnosis of Meniere's disease is based on the clinical setting of the patient. This disease usually presents with unilateral ear symptoms but can be also bilateral. Meniere's disease attacks are usually random and episodic (approximately  6-11 per year), with periods of remission that can last from months to years. Investigations are audiometry, electronystagmogram, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and imaging.The management consist pharmacological and non pharmacological. Meniere's disease is initially progressive but fluctuates unexpectedly. It is difficult to distinguish natural resolutions from treatment effects.
COMPARISON OF HYDRODISECTION INJECTION BETWEEN TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME Widodo Mardi Santoso; Badrul Munir; Catur Ari Setianto; Ria Damayanti; Sheny Agma
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.781 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.02.1

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy, which is caused by suppression of the median nerve below the transverse carpi ligament. Local corticosteroid injection is considered the fastest and most effective method for improving symptoms that occur in CTS. There are several corticosteroid agents that can be used, but there are no objective standards that can explain the most ideal drugs. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodisection injection therapy of triamcinolone acetonide versus dexamethasone on carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This study involved 30 participants who were diagnosed with CTS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were obtained. Participants were divided into two treatment groups; the first group (n = 15) injected with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TCA) 10mg / 1ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml and the second group (n = 15) injected with Dexamethasone 4mg / 0.8ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml. The NRS, FSS, and SSS parameters were assessed before injection and 4 weeks after injection in each agent. Then compared these parameters at 4 weeks after injection compared to the TCA group with the dexamethasone group. Results: NRS score before and 4 weeks after TCA injection (sig 0.000; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0.001; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0.020; p <0.05), and NRS score before and 4 weeks after dexamethasone injection (sig 0.001; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05). At 4 weeks after injection of TCA compared to dexamethasone there were no significant results on NRS (sig 0.237; p> 0.05) and FSS (sig 0.119; p> 0.05), while SSS values were significantly different (sig 0.027; p <0.05). Conclusion: Significant improvement in NRS, FSS and SSS score was obtained at 4 weeks after hydrodisection injection, both with TCA and dexamethasone. At 4 weeks after TCA injection compared to dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in NRS and FSS scores, whereas SSS score differed significantly. Both injection agents are equally effective in treating CTS, but dexamethasone produces a better improvement in SSS score.
DANDY-WALKER VARIANT (DWV) IN 70 YEARS OLD WOMAN WITH DISEQUILIBRIUM AND CENTRAL VERTIGO : A CASE REPORT Ria Damayanti; Muhammad Welly Dafif; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan; Badrul Munir; Zamroni Afif
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.01.2

Abstract

Dandy Walker Syndrome (DWS) and its Variants (DWV) is a congenital disorder that has prevalence of 1 in 25,000 to 30,000 births with the highest incidence occurs at age <1 year. However, patients may be diagnosed with DWS/DWV for the first time in adolescence and even old age. We reported the 70-year-old woman with a chief complaint of central type vertigo accompanied by disequilbrium. From history taking we obtained disequilibrium with gradual onset started in nine months and become settled since the last 6 months before she came to the neurology clinic. The patient also complained vertigo that have emerged since the last 3 month. A history of head trauma, stroke, dementia was denied. Physical examinaton show central nystagmus while other cranial nerve within normal range. Motor, sensory and autonomic status within normal range. Romberg test, tandem walking, disdiadokokinesia, and dismetria examination shows abnormal respons. MMSE results for patients within normal range (score:26). Head MRI shows Dandy Walker Variant in the accompanied by cerebral atrophy and degeneration serebelli Fazekas grade I. Patients receive symptomatic therapy betahistine mesylate 3x6 mg if necessary. Surgery management is not indicated because there is no sign of hydrocephalus or signs of increased intracranial pressure.
COMPARATIVE OF INTRAARTICULAR INJECTION BETWEEN DEXTROSE PROLOTHERAPY VERSUS TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS Widodo Mardi Santoso; Andhy Indriyono; Badrul Munir; Alidha Nur Rakhmani; Machlusil Husna
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.1

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common cartilage degenerative disorders that is a major problem because it causes chronic pain and disability. Therefore the method of treatment and prevention of old age is a big challenge. The results of Dextrose Prolotherapy compared to Triamcinolone therapy research are still varied. Objective:  to  compare  the effectiveness  of  Dextrose  Prolotherapy  and  Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) in the treatment of moderate knee knee OA.True experimental single blind study, at the Neurology Polyclinic Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang for 6 months (July-December 2019). Group I; Dextrose Prolotherapy (15%) intraarticularly injected 3 times every 4 weeks and group II; TA one- time intraarticular injection. The parameters studied were The Western Ontario and McMaster  Universities  Osteoarthritis  Index  (WOMAC)  Score,  Numeric  Rating  Scale (NRS), and Range of Motion (ROM), weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24. Forty samples consisted of; the 20 samples of the Dextrose Prolotherapy group consisted of; male: female = 2 (10%): 18 (90%), age 62.4 + 7.28, BMI 25.6 + 3.69 kg / m2, pain duration 22.35 + 20.10 months, history of physiotherapy 40.27 + 20.79 times. Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 17 (85%), grade III 3 (15%). TA group; male: female = 5 (25%):15 (75%), age 62.5 + 9.02, BMI 28.4 + 5.01 kg/m2, pain duration 15.95 +  16.55  months,  history  of  physiotherapy  34  +  24.87  times.  Kellgren  –  Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 18 (90%), grade III; 2 (10%). Comparison of NRS at rest Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA of week 4 (2.60 vs 1.25), week 8 (1.65 vs 1.40), week 12 (0.8 vs 2.05), week 24 (0.75 vs 3.35). Comparison of NRS during activity Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (4.45 vs 3.35), week 8 (3.25 vs 3.55), week 12 (2.55 vs 4.30), week 24 (2.55 vs 5.80). Comparison of ROM flexion Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (127.05° vs 123.60°), week  8  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  12  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  24  (131.05°  vs 122.10°). Comparison of WOMAC score Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (30.05 vs 22.45), week 8 (22.90 vs 23.95), week 12 (19.30 vs 29.05), week 24 (18.95 vs 35.40). Intraarticular Injection Dextrose Prolotherapy is more effective for the long term based on pain scale NRS, WOMAC score and ROM. Whereas short-term TA is more effective than Dextrose Prolotherapy.
RADIOFREQUENCY AS PAIN INTERVENTIONAL THERAPY IN NEUROLOGY Badrul Munir; Widodo Mardi Santoso; Zamroni Afif; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.3

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) intervention uses high frequency alternating current (AC) to inhibit and alter nociceptive pathway in various locations. Radiofrequency is divided into Continuous RF (CRF) and Pulsed RF (PRF). Continuous RF is a process in which the RF current is used to produce thermal lesions on the target nerve that will result in resistance to the afferent nociceptive pathway. PRF is a process whereby short bursts of RF are discharged toward a neural target that will produce a signal for lowering pain. PRF is a therapy of neural tissue with small neurodestructive possibility and is an alternative technique for continuing RF. RF therapy is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used for about three decades to treat various chronic pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia, post herpes neuralgia, lower back pain (LBP), and complex regional pain syndromes or sympathetic reflex dystrophy. The mechanism action of the PRF involves cellular structure damage, neuronal activation, altered gene expression, a global continuation of evoked synaptic  activity in pain fibers through centrals and changes in synaptic strength and long-term potentiation.  PRF with its various characteristics has a better outcome than conventional RF.
LOW BACK PAIN Andaru Cahya S; Widodo Mardi Santoso; Machlusil Husna; Badrul Munir; Shahdevi Nandar Kurniawan
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.01.4

Abstract

Low back pain is the most common symptom found in the primary health care and is the number one cause of disability throughout worldwide. It is estimated that around 60 – 80% the world population will experience back pain during their lifespan. There are three different source of pain in the spine: axial-lumbosacral, radicular and reffered pain. All of these source brings different clinical presentations. Low back pain could be classified as acute, subacute and chronic low back pain. The pain could be nociceptive or neuropathic, the most common symptoms reported are “pressure pain” and “pain attack”.  The physician should be aware of “red flags” symptoms that lead into more serious condition beside back pain and, therefore the patient has to be investigated to further examination whenever these symptoms present. The management of low back pain consist of severe modalities, both therapeutic and rehabilitative procedure. Oftentimes, the management needed multidisciplinary approach. It is important to general practitioners to identify and treat low back pain appropriately to reduce the burden of the disease and to prevent the disabilties caused by this condition.