Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Investigating Public Perception Toward The Level Crossing Without Railway Gate Crossing (Case Study: At JPL 297 and 294 Lamongan) Handoko Handoko; Natriya Faisal Rachman; Firdaus Ade Kurniawan; Rao Guangjiong
Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): May
Publisher : Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (476.352 KB) | DOI: 10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.7

Abstract

According to the Minister of Transportation regulation No. 36 article 4, year 2011 concerning the intersection of level crossings, the minimum distance between crossings is 800 meters. However, this regulation has not been well implemented at the level crossings of JPL 297, 295, and 294 at Sukodadi Village, Lamongan Regency. Since the regulations are not implemented yet, hence the accidents frequently occur. Therefore, this study was conducted to find out public perceptions of the planned closure of JPL 297 and 294. This study applied descriptive quantitative method by calculating LHR and vehicle queue lengths. Among the three JPLs, the JPL with the highest LHR was JPL 295 with the total of 249 vehicles per hour. Meanwhile, the longest queue of vehicles occurred at JPL 295 reaching 23 meters. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by using multiple linear regression. The findings claimed that the indicators of benefits involved convenience and safety in 180, 11,506 and 7,781, while the result of the public perception obtained 66.8%.
An Analysis of Passengers’ Safety Risk at the Infrastructure Improvement Project of Railway Station Nanda Ahda Imron; Dian M Setiawan; Ali Oktavian Handoko; Erifendi Churniawan; Handoko Handoko; Ary Putra Iswanto
Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.792 KB) | DOI: 10.37367/jrtt.v1i2.13

Abstract

Constructing the elevated track at the Manggarai Railway Station has risk which potentially endangers the passengers’ safety due to its construction process is carried out within passengers’ activities around the railway station. This research aims to identify the hazard and risks, analyze the level and control the risk. Moreover, this study also aims to arrange the priority of serial alternative solutions regarding the handling the risk within the construction process of elevated track. This study used methods as follows: Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, And Risk Control (HIRARC) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In addition, data triangulation was also done by involving three respondents in keeping with to ensure the validity. The analysis of HIRARC generated 11 hazards and risks namely 6 are classified into extreme risks, 4 are rated high risk and 1 is categorized as medium risk. The method of AHP is used to analyze the alternative ways of handling the risks and to find out the priorities above some alternative ways of handling the risks. The sequence of the alternative ways of handling the risks based on the top priority is as follows: (1) first priority by applying the switch over 5, (2) second priority by adding the KLB feeder, (3) third priority by increasing the service facility.