<![CDATA[Pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017, penggunaan hak angket mengalami gejala ekstensifikasi subjek maupun objek. Riset ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh dua hal. Pertama, implikasi Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 terhadap penggunaan hak angket. Kedua, melimitasi penggunaan hak angket terhadap KPK dengan memberikan batas konstitusional. Metode riset merupakan penelitian hukum doktriner dengan basis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan; (1) terdapat tiga implikasi penggunaan hak angket pasca Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017. Pertama, perubahan paradigma konseptual terhadap hak angket, kedua, perluasan pola hubungan kelembagaan, ketiga, ancaman stabilitas pemerintahan. (2) Perihal batas konstitusional penggunaan angket terhadap KPK, penulis melimitasi penggunaan angket terhadap dua bentuk. Pertama melimitasi kriteria penggunaan hak angket dan kedua, melimitasi objek penyelidikan hak angket.After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/2017, the use of inquiry rights undergo subject and object extensification. This study focus into two discussions. First, the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/ 2017 towards the use of inquiry rights. Second, to give limitation of the use of inquiry rights towards the Corruption Eradication Commision (KPK). This research study is normative law research. The results show that (1) There are three implications of the use of inquiry rights; firstly, the changing of conceptual paradigm for the inquiry rights, secondly, the extensification of the institusional relations pattern, thirdly, the threat of governance stability. (2) Regarding the constitutional limits on the use of inquiry rights, the author sets the limitation in two forms: limiting the criteria and limiting the objects of the inquiry rights.]]>
