Alim Bathoro, Alim
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pembangunan Kemaritiman dan Pesisir Studi Kasus: Analisis Kebijakan Jembatan Selat Sunda Peraturan Presiden Nomor 86 Tahun 2011 Bathoro, Alim
Jurnal Selat Vol 3 No 2 (2016): "Kemaritiman & Perbatasan"
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (126.877 KB)

Abstract

The process of development are two sides of the same coin, one side is the physical development and the other side is human development. However, in the development process, usually prefer the physical development, and less attention to human development. Therefore, people as objects, not subjects of development. The political authorities see development only in terms of economic benefits, the development of socio-political side ignored. Therefore, the development has a problem. Maritime development in the coastal areas and archipelago are also experiencing the same dilemma. In order to obtain an understanding of maritime development, this study will analyze the policy of the Sunda Strait bridge. Therefore, this study will analyze, who benefited from the Sunda Strait Bridge project, and who was defeated in the Sunda Strait Bridge project. If we read Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) No 86 Tahun 2011 related to the Sunda Strait Bridge, the actors had been found, they are government officials (local and central) and national enterprises. This research found that conflicts of interest between the central and local elite, has resulted in making the Sunda Strait bridge construction was delayed several times. Clearly, national enterprises seems to be the main actor in the local policy, both in Lampung and Banten. That is in local policies, local governments easily become part of the national enterprises interests Keywords : Policy, Actor, Elite, Government
Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Reformasi Birokrasi di Vietnam Bathoro, Alim
Kemudi Vol 1 No 1 (2016): KEMUDI: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (970.443 KB)

Abstract

This research discusses the reformation of bureaucracy in Vietnam. The elites of the central government were involved in the process. This study questions state-elite relations in implementing reformation of bureaucracy in combating corruption, what form, what factors shape the form and under what circumstances does it change. Studies on this subject varies from statist, elitist approach. The statist approach focuses on the role of the state, questioning whether it dominate the politics (Evans),. Elitist approach focuses on the concentration and exercise of power by elites (Mills, Mosca, Pareto, and Keller) in shaping policies. This research shows that the conflict between the central elite is caused by dispute over implementing reformation of bureaucracy in combating corruption. The dispute over implementing reformation of bureaucracy within the administration had led to the function of state autonomy in which case is combating corruption indicated by how the state not seriously became government program. This occurred due to the ability of the international issue to influence the policy of Vietnam government. In turn this impacted the state, in this case the government of Vietnam, to be capable of taking normal political decisions but to be incapable taking political decisions of combating corruption. This study supports and corroborates state autonomy theory on the state as dominate policies of combating corruption. In particular on state autonomy that is shown by the interest of elites of central government. In theory of the state’s autonomy is the manner in which the state manages the distortion or pressure of the global issue of corruption.
Redupnya Peran Politik Islam Di Masa Demokrasi Terpimpin (Studi Kasus Pembubaran Masyumi Oleh Presiden Soekarno) Bathoro, Alim
Kemudi Vol 2 No 2 (2018): KEMUDI: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (533.831 KB)

Abstract

In the relationship between Islam and the state it is necessary to clarify the political decision of the ruler over the political role of Islam. As the majority religion in Indonesia, it is only natural that Islam becomes part of the relations in the political decision of the ruler. Therefore, examining the relationship between Islam and the state has an important meaning, for this reason the research seeks to explain the common thread of the state and Islam, especially how the political bargaining of Muslims with the authorities. In the period of Guided Democracy, President Soekarno was a political ruler, along with other political forces such as the Indonesian Army and the PKI. For this reason, tracking President Soekarnos past role in Guided Democracy was a major study in order to reflect the current relationship between the ruler and Islam. This research will look at the role of President Soekarno towards Masyumi in the national political contestation during the Guided Democracy period. The existence of ideological linkages between President Soekarno and President Joko Widodo, makes this research interesting. Are there points of equality between the two as a study of political decision making by a ruler.