Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

IMPLIKASI PRINSIP MOST FAVOURED NATION TERHADAP PENGATURAN TARIF IMPOR DI INDONESIA Pebrianto, Dony Yusra
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 2 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (687.98 KB)

Abstract

The existence of trade liberalization is faced with the fact that the competition of countries in trade especially in this case export and import increasingly felt very rapidly. The existence of international legal instruments that are commonly contained in the General Agreement on Tarriff and Trade (GATT) becomes an important point in the international trade regulatory concept for GATT member countries incorporated in the World Trade Organization (WTO). So the principles are also embedded in the drafting of the concept of national law for States that have ratified GATT. Indonesia, one of the countries that have ratified GATT, is bound by these Principles, one of which is the Most Favored Nation Principle which implies the regulation of import tariff in Indonesia. So protection of local commodities is closed even if limited to maintain the continuity of national production.
IMPLIKASI PRINSIP MOST FAVOURED NATION TERHADAP PENGATURAN TARIF IMPOR DI INDONESIA Dony Yusra Pebrianto
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 2 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The existence of trade liberalization is faced with the fact that the competition of countries in trade especially in this case export and import increasingly felt very rapidly. The existence of international legal instruments that are commonly contained in the General Agreement on Tarriff and Trade (GATT) becomes an important point in the international trade regulatory concept for GATT member countries incorporated in the World Trade Organization (WTO). So the principles are also embedded in the drafting of the concept of national law for States that have ratified GATT. Indonesia, one of the countries that have ratified GATT, is bound by these Principles, one of which is the Most Favored Nation Principle which implies the regulation of import tariff in Indonesia. So protection of local commodities is closed even if limited to maintain the continuity of national production.
Transparency Principle on Land Acquisition for Agrarian Justice Rosmidah Rosmidah; Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Jambe Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jlj.3.1.83-101

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the state’s efforts to guarantee the principle of transparency and implement it into land acquisition process for the sake of public interest. With normative method, this article found that the land, despite of being an object of private ownership, has a social function. Therefore, the state has an authority to regulate the utilisation and use of land for the sake of public interests through a land acquisition. In recent years, disputes due to land acquisition between the government and the land owners has always increased, resulting in the use of violence and public distrust against the government. It is believed that such the condition was triggered by the lack of transparency as long as the land acquisitions are concerned. In order to realize agrarian justice, which is the state’s obligation, it is necessary to guarantee the principle of transparency in the land acquisition process which are the basic rights of land owners / holders and the general public. Because the principles of openness and transparency in the Land Acquisition Law are obscure in norms, it is necessary to interpret the law. The principles of openness and transparency are carried out from the planning, preparation, implementation stages to the stage of submitting the results of land acquisition. At the empirical level, it must be implemented without causing various encapsulation resulting in land acquisition disputes. The principles of openness and transparency are needed to facilitate the flow of community participation in development
Pengapusan Hak Veto Dalam Rangka Reformasi Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Dewi Afrilianti; Budi Ardianto; Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 2 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v2i2.12114

Abstract

This study aims to find out what is the reason the veto is considered irrelevant to the Security Council in realizing world security and peace in connection with the plan of veto power in the framework of reform of the United Nations Security Council because the use of veto rights by the five permanent member states of the Security Council, especially the United States has been used with no limits. The research method used is normative type with statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study show that the security council's veto power in practice has deviated from its original intent. The reform efforts of the United Nations Security Council have many obstacles but the main obstacles that greatly hinder the reform efforts are the arrogant, selfish, and willless nature of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council who are veto holders to continue to maintain their hegemony and national interests. Keywords: United Nations; Right; Veto;
Eksistensi Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengaturan Pemilihan Kepala Desa Ditinjau dari Undrip (Studi Kasus Pemilihan Kepala Desa pada Masyarakat Adat Kedepatian Semerap Kabupaten Kerinci) Dony Yusra Pebrianto; Budi Ardianto; Taufan Dyusanda Putra
Wajah Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2021): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v5i1.280

Abstract

Internationally The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) emphasizes respect for the local wisdom of indigenous legal communities. The selection of village heads is one of the regulatory concepts stipulated in Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages. The selection of village heads in the concept of this law is conducted simultaneously stipulated by local regulations and the procedures are specifically regulated through government regulations as stipulated in Article 31 of Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages. But it turns out that in practice, especially in indigenous peoples, the deability of the village head election often clashes with the arrangement of the village head election. So in this case the formulation of the problem in this writing is how the arrangement of the rights of indigenous peoples in The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the value and concept of local wisdom that applies in the selection of village heads in 5 (Five) Villages Semerap Kedepatian. The method used in this writing uses empirical juridical methods. And in this case it is concluded that UNDRIP regulates matters relating to individual rights as well as very specific collective rights sourced from indigenous peoples. In this case the State is obliged to protect or fulfill the rights of indigenous peoples including cultural heritage and their cultural manifestations including human resources and genetics. And in the indigenous people of kedepatian semerap Kerinci regency there is a customary provision where the prospective head of the village must get customary recommendations and be appointed from Depati and Nenek Mamak. The provision is considered contrary to the local Paraturan in relation to the election of the village head. So given the provisions of UNDRIP and the 1945 Constitution, the State is obliged to protect and maintain these customs given the positive impact that arises from it. So in this case the customary provisions should be regulated in the Regulation including also about the recognition of indigenous peoples. In addition, the community needs to open a paradigm on human rights in the selection of village heads in addition to the paradigm of the enforcement of customary law there needs to be flexibility from the State as long as it is not contrary to national law.
Perlindungan Terhadap Petugas Medis di Daerah Konflik Berdasarkan Hukum Humaniter Internasional (Studi Kasus Perawat Palestina Razan Al Najjar yang di Tembak Mati Oleh Tentara Israel Pada Tahun 2018) Lorenci Chakti Pratama; Novianti Novianti; Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 2 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v2i1.10984

Abstract

War or armed conflict is a legitimate step to resolve various problems when peaceful methods can no longer find a solution. Armed disputes are regulated in the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. An armed dispute is sure to bring tremendous suffering to mankind. Millions of people, both military and civilian, were victims. The result of armed conflict is that there are many victims, so medical officers are urgently needed to provide assistance and care for war victims. But in reality there are still many violations against medical personnel. Medical personnel are deliberately targeted for attack by the parties to the dispute, even though the Geneva Conventions I 1949 and the 1977 Additional Protocol clearly state that medical personnel must always be respected and protected and should not be the object of attack. This study attempts to analyze the forms of legal protection for medical personnel in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Additional Protocol II 1977 and the factors that cause the disputing parties to not comply with the rules of International Humanitarian Law on the protection of medical personnel. So that the results of this study can provide some clarity about the forms of legal protection for medical personnel and the factors that cause violations of humanitarian law against the protection of medical workers.
Celah Hukum Spionase: Cukup dengan Hukum Kebiasaan atau Tata Cara Perang Perlu Pembaharuan? Edson Septo Yosia; Dony Yusra Pebrianto; Mochammad Farisi
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 2 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v2i3.13309

Abstract

At first, war was only carried out by the disputing parties but as the times progressed, the war also had an impact on the surrounding area or other countries. Arrangements for war need to be made such as war treaties or procedures. One of the unclear regulations concerning the act of espionage or what is known as spying. International humanitarian law regulates the customs of war and the manner of war. It turns out that the convention does not clearly regulate the legal protection of spy agencies. This article tries to discuss the urgency of protecting spy agents who are serving in war under humanitarian law.
Tinjauan Precautionary Principle Dalam Hukum Internasional Terkait Pertanggung Jawaban Negara Dalam Penanganan Dan Pencegahan Wabah Covid 19 Dony Yusra Pebrianto; Akbar Kurnia Putra; Budi Ardianto
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Volume 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jssh.v6i1.19390

Abstract

Keberadaan pertanggung jawaban Negara tentu tidak dapat dilepaskan dari konsepsi hukum dalam pencegahan dan penanganan covid 19. Pandangan universal ini tentu secara hukum perlu ditelaah secara mendasar dalam tataran prinsip itu sendiri, di samping itu tentunya untuk mewujudkan suatau ulasan penelitian yang universal perlu suatau telaah yang dilakukan berdasarkan hukum internasional. Salah satu prinsip hukum yakni Precautionary Principle atau lazim dikenal dengan prinsip kehati-hatian. Pada dasarnya prinsip lazim berkembang dan diterapkan di dalam hukum lingkungan. Maka dirumuskan permasalahan yakni bagaimana konsep precautionary principle dalam hukum internasional serta bagaimana penerapan Precautionary Principle dalam hal pertanggung jawaban Negara dalam penanganan dan pencegahan wabah covid 19 yang dikaji dengan metode yuridis normative. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa Precautionary Principle adalah suatu prinsip yang mengatur tentang kehati-hatian yang pada dasarnya keberadaannya berada dalam sector hukum privat maupun hukum publik. Secara dimensi hukum internasional, prinsip ini berkembang di dalam hukum lingkungan internasional yang berkaitan erat dengan hukum kesehatan. Pada prinsip ini dituntut adanya kehati-hatian dalam menetapkan suatu kebijakan maupun peraturan perundang-undangan untuk mnghormati dan melindungi HAM serta tentunya hak hukum manusia. Serta dalam pandemic covid 19 negara dituntut untuk memperhatikan precautionary principle dalam menetapkan kebijakan maupun keputusan serta produk hukum. Hal ini dikarenakan secara hukum jika negara mengabaikan hal tersebut maka sepatutnya negara dapat dituntut di hadapan hukum baik terhadap pelanggaran atas hak asasi ataupun pelanggaran hukum yang menimbulkan kerugian maupun materiil maupun imateril.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Berada Di Wilayah Perang Menurut Konvensi Jenewa 1949 Dengan Protokol Tambahan 1977 Intan Amini; Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 3 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v3i2.14475

Abstract

This article discusses how to protect children who are in areas of armed conflict. Protection of children has been regulated in the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Additional Protocols 1977, International Convention on The Rights of Childs 1989, Optional Protocol on Involvent of Children in Armed Conflict 2000. However, the parties to the conflict still violate the principle of distinction, the principle of limitation, the principle of balance, and the principles of protection that apply in international humanitarian law. In fact, Humanitarian Law prohibits civilians from being used as objects of violence and must be given protection from all matters relating to war. Meanwhile, combatants can be used as objects of violence during war, but they must still be given protection when they are prisoners of war. As a form of state responsibility, criminal sanctions and compensation need to be applied to ensure legal certainty and provide justice for the parties who are victims according to humanitarian law.
Implikasi Prinsip National Treatment Terhadap Pengaturan Tenaga Kerja Asing Di Indonesia Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Riau Law Journal Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Riau Law Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.763 KB) | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.v5i1.7851

Abstract

Keanggotaan Indonesia dalam WTO membuat Indonesia terikat dengan ketentuan dan prinsip-prinsip yang berlaku di dalam GATT. Salah satu prinsip tersebut adalah Prinsip National Treatment yang berimplikasi kepada semua sistem terkait salah satunya sektor ketenagakerjaan khususnya tenaga kerja asing. Untuk itu perlu ditelaah mengenai prinsip National Treatment tersebut dan implikasinya terhadap pengaturan tenaga kerja asing di Indonesia yang dikaji secara yuridis normatif. Didapatlah suatu hipotesis bahwa Prinsip National Treatment adalah bentuk dari konsepsi anti diskriminasi GATT dimana adanya larangan untuk membedakan produk barang maupun jasa dalam konteks GATT dan negara-negara anggota WTO.  Prinsip ini merupakan ruh penting dari GATT yang merupakan reduksi dari konsepsi perdagangan bebas itu sendiri, sehingga penerapan prinsip ini sangat penting dalam kerangka GATT khususnya bagi negara-negara anggota WTO selain itu implikasi Prinsip National Treatment terhadap pengaturan tenaga kerja asing adalah sebagai anggota WTO yang telah meratifikasi GATT tentu indonesia terikat dengan konspsi bahwa adanya larangan diskriminasi terhadap penggunaan tenaga kerja asing. Namun di sisi lain, indonesia juga terikat dengan kepentingan nasional sebagai amanah konstitusi yakni melindungi segenap bangsa indonesia dan kepentingannya. Maka dalam satu sisi secara hukum indonesia harus menghapus segala bentuk diskriminasi, sedangkan di sisi lain indonesia harus melindungi kepentingan nasional.