<![CDATA[MENDAMAIKAN KEBENARAN, MENGHENTIKAN PERANG(Analisis Filosofis terhadap Akar-Akar Konflik)Abdul HalimIAIN Sunan Ampel Surabayahalim_iain@yahoo.com AbtractTo fundamentalism, which often being attractive and tend to be hard and fast looking, Lieven Boeve casts criticism related to the discourse of the âtruthâ as this is interpreted as the sole and the single proprietary, even its âesenseâ could not be flexible when meeting with other truths. According to Boeve, âtruthâ belongs to compound, and anyone can speak of this ownership. However, this truth claim should not preclude interactively with other truth when comes to public spaces. Lieven Boeve then comes with a notion that he called it deficit theory of truth. Why deficit? Because each community or group has its own truth, based on traditions, beliefs, consensus and agreement. While out there, there are other communities with different traditions, beliefs, and consensus. Thus, the truth is spread on many particular communities. The truth belongs to a community is deficit, for there is a different truth held by other communities. Therefore, in view of the truth, it should be seen as a communal-intersubjective.]]>
Copyrights © 2012
