Jambe Law Journal
Vol 2 No 2 (2019)

A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s KPK and Hong Kong ICAC in Eradicating Corruption

Ridwan Arifin (Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang)
Rodiyah Rodiyah (Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang)
Fitria Puspita (Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang)

Article Info

Publish Date
28 Jan 2020


This article seeks to discusses anti-corruption policies in Indonesia and Hong Kong. This research arises from the phenomenon of corruption that has become widespread in Indonesia and seems to be a never-endingproblem that has caused great damage in all sectors of life. It's not only a matter of how much the state loss or corrupt modus operandi that is even more sophisticated and even makes Indonesia one of the highest-rankingcountries in corruption cases, but it is also a matter of law enforcement whihch is less smart in handling corruption cases themselves. On the other hand, reportedly having a different approach in combating corruption, Hong Kong is considered to have been successful in carrying out its duties. With comparative study, this article will elaborate various patterns of work conducted by anti-corruption institutions in Indonesia and Hong Kong, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

Copyrights © 2019

Journal Info





Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice


Jambe Law Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Law Jambi University twice a year in May and November. It aims primarily to facilitate professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning ...