Jurnal Konstitusi
Vol 7, No 5 (2010)

Mencermati Ratio Decidendi Mk Dalam Putusan Nomor 122/Puu-Vii/2009 Tentang Penderogasian Norma Hukum dan Sifat Putusan PTUN

Widodo Ekatjahjana (Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember. Ketua Umum Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (APHAMK).)

Article Info

Publish Date
20 May 2016

Abstract

Ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court that said he was not an organ that has an authority to review constitutional rights loss of applicant, beside contrary to constitutional protection principles, also contrary to functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution, the protector of citizen’s constitutional rights dan the protector of human rights. The Constitutional Court should avoid to put his legal reasoning (in his ratio decidendi) that verdict of administrative court has not a legal nature – erga omnes. He should become aware that an administrative dispute is a public dispute bound under public law principles.

Copyrights © 2016




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
421.331 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Konstitusi
Website

Abbrev

jk

Publisher

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Subject

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another ...