Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Vol 12, No 3 (2012)

PROSES LEGITIMISASI ‘HMT’ DI PENGADILAN TIPIKOR AMARTA

Teddy Asmara (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
15 Sep 2012

Abstract

This study describes the process of enculturation anti-corruption where its dynamic has change to a legitimation of should punish the defendant. With ethnographic case study approach, the study focused on how judges interpret the criminal acts of corruption and how to respond to legitimate to punish the defendant in the context of decision-making. The results showed that the judges react in two ways of reasonings, first, they interpret it as an intervention or intimidation that threatens self-identity. Second, open records his experience of corruption and political relations, or not as transparent as other cases. Technically, the conceptual relationship between the two reasoning is a psycho-cultural cognition as a perfect reflection on their work, structured from the examination to the decision. In other word, the defendant not guilty verdict symbolizes maintaining self-identy and a rejection of legitimation of the defendant should be penalised.                                                                             Key words:    legitimation of defendant should be penalised, meaning of corruption cases, psycho-cultural cognition. 

Copyrights © 2012






Journal Info

Abbrev

JDH

Publisher

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman adalah jurnal terakreditasi nasional yang berfungsi sebagai media informasi dan komunikasi di bidang hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum diterbitkan 3 kali dalam satu tahun yaitu bulan Januari, Mei dan September yang didalamnya memuat ...