Jurnal Konstitusi
Vol 9, No 2 (2012)

Dilematika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi vs Kekuatan Politik dalam Impeachment Presiden

Nadir, Nadir (Unknown)

Article Info

Publish Date
20 May 2016

Abstract

The involvement of the constitutional court of RI in examining and ruling on  the case of presidential impeachment is textually not the authority but obligation that whether or not presidential impeachment happen during president’s terms of office will be determined by the supporting political strength in the MPR session.  The decision taken in the session should be based on the decision of Constitutional Court as the interpreter and the guardian of the constitution. This condition causes Constitutional Court decision becomes dillematic because it will be determined by the political strength in the session of the MPR. Besides,the fact that three of the nine judges are proposed by the President and three other are proposed by DPR is also dilemmatic.

Copyrights © 2012




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
451.646 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Konstitusi
Website

Abbrev

jk

Publisher

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Description

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil ...