cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6282111929912
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.bpk@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav 31 Jakarta Pusat 10210
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara
Published by Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI
ISSN : 24603937     EISSN : 2549452X     DOI : 10.28986/jtaken
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara with registered number ISSN 2460-3937 (print), ISSN 2549-452X (online) is a scientific journal published by Directorate of Research and Development, The Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI). This journal was first published in 2015 and associated with Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI).Each submitted article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers. This journal publishes two numbers in one volume each year, with 5 articles in each number. This journal has been accredited by the Directorate General for Research Strengthening and Development, the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (Peringkat 2) since year 2016 to 2020 according to the decree No. 21/E/KPT/2018.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 158 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
THE ROLES OF POLITICAL POWER IN BUDGET PROCESS: HOW TO ACCOMODATE THEM? A CASE STUDY Zarista, Eden; Ichsan, Muhammad
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v6i1.412

Abstract

This research has two main objectives. The first objective is to identify the role of political power in the budgeting process, while the second is to propose a  control mechanism to enable a budgeting process to accommodate political power in terms of accountability. Indonesia?s Corruption Eradication Commission reports on the misuse of political power to manipulate budgeting in an organized manner. Execution of the budgeting process that does not follow the prevailing strategic policy constitutes fraud. The functions of budgeting are allocation, distribution, and stabilization. This study analyzes budgeting that intertwines with the wielding of political power. The study employed qualitative research supplemented by a case study to explain why and how such phenomena are occurring. The analysis was conducted using the thematic method by way of open-ended questionnaires to explain the data and information that were accumulated concerning the topic at hand and their relevance. Results show that political power plays both negative and positive roles. The positive aspect of the exercise of political power is that it is used as a public channel between society and the government, while its negative impact is the various risks that it poses, such as political power being used to advance self-interests. Political power does not share the same degree of impartiality as statutory rules. The form of politics can alter a budgeting activity or program. The application of a certain budgeting system is proposed to reduce errors and record activity history. Concerning the evaluation of APBD by the DPRD, APIP must help enforce control by reviewing budget changes against the relevant goals and objectives.
BUDGET RATCHETING IN GOVERNMENTAL BUDGETING: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION Misra, Fauzan
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1161.068 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v6i1.400

Abstract

Previous literature has documented various aspects of behavior in the budgeting process. Behavioral problems that are often discussed include budgetary slack and opportunistic behavior that occur due to information asymmetry. However, there is little attention to behavioral problems in previous studies called ratcheting behavior. This study investigates such behavior in a governmental budgeting setting. Besides, this study extends by testing ratchet behavior when local government adopts a well-known budget control mechanism, called analysis on standardized expenditure. To accomplish this purpose, study participants role-played as the budget preparer on a government budgeting task. The experiment used a web-based instrument that involved 51 participants. Results showed that budget preparer engaged in a ratchet behavior when setting their budget. Furthermore, budget ratcheting did not occur when preparer using an analysis of standardized expenditure. However, this situation only remains for one year. In the next year, preparer engaged in a ratchet behavior, at a lower intention. These findings underscore the importance of analysis of standardized expenditure in a government budgeting process environment. As a practical contribution, these findings suggest that using and monitoring for the adoption of analysis on standardized expenditure should be maintained continuously.   
DO THE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE AUDITS CORRELATES WITH CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT? Yanto, Deri; Adrison, Vid
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1950.428 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v6i1.378

Abstract

Public procurement is the main area of corruption in the government. This study aims to examine the correlation between government expenditure audit conducted by BPK and local government corruption behavior. This study uses a fixed effect panel regression approach and the dependent variable is the value of irregularities in the public procurement sector in all local governments in      Indonesia. This study found that the government expenditure audit carried out in the previous period correlated with changes in local government corruption behavior. Local governments will reduce corruption behavior as an implication of changing views and calculating expected cost corruption based on their experience of being audited. Besides, local governments expect their probabilities to be re-audited. It is evident in the local government which has not been audited for three years that it will try to reduce its corrupt behavior because it is expected that this year will be audited again. This study suggests an increase in audit frequency that is expected to decrease the aggregate corruption level in public procurement in local government. 
MANDATORY AUDITOR ROTATION: THE PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS (A CASE STUDY IN BPK) Anggraini, Putri
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v6i1.394

Abstract

After years of implementation of the policy, there is an inconclusive opinion of whether a mandatory auditor rotation could improve the independence of auditors, including those working within the public sector, such as BPK. This study intends to empirically test the impact of mandatory rotation towards auditors' independence in fact and in appearance. Additionally, the study examines how auditor satisfaction towards the policy affects their perceived benefits and drawbacks of the scheme. Following a statistical assessment of primary data using the independent-samples t-test, findings show that independence in appearance of auditors would be enhanced as a result of mandatory rotation. The rotation policy, however, could not by itself improve auditors? independence in fact. Consequently, complementary schemes are needed to preserve the independence in fact of auditors. Further, auditors who have a favorable view of mandatory rotation would assume that the mechanism offers more advantages than disadvantages. On the other hand, unhappy employees would perceive that mandatory rotation brings more adverse effects than positive ones. The vast majority of respondents also believe that the rotation mechanism is necessary to be implemented in BPK. Lastly, a number of valuable respondent inputs aimed to improve the rotation scheme are elaborated in this study.
AUDIT KEUANGAN DAN KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT STUDI PADA KABUPATEN BADUNG, TABANAN DAN KOTA DENPASAR TAHUN 2013 Bahrullah Akbar; Achmad Djazuli
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1198.862 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.9

Abstract

Based on Article 23 UUD 1945, state finance management is addressed for the prosperity of people. Economic and non-economic welfare are two elements that form the prosperity of the people. This study aimed to see the relationship between a financial audit and the welfare of the people in the Regencies of Badung, Tabanan, and the City of Denpasar. This study uses descriptive methodology to describe the relationship between the financial audit with the people's welfare through comparative techniques and scatter plots. The study result shows that economic welfare indicators in Bali are generally better than the national average. In addition, this study proved empirically that there is no strong relationship between financial audit particularly with people's welfare. ABSTRAKBerdasarkan pasal 23 UUD 1945, pengelolaan keuangan negara ditujukan untuk sebesarbesarnya kemakmuran rakyat. Kesejahteraan ekonomi dan kesejahteraan non ekonomi merupakan dua elemen yang membentuk kemakmuran rakyat. Kajian ini ditujukan untuk menghubungkan antara audit keuangan dan kesejahteraan rakyat di Kabupaten Badung, Tabanan dan Kota Denpasar Provinsi Bali. Metodologi deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hubungan antara audit keuangan dengan kesejahteraan rakyat melalui teknik komparasi dan scatter plot digunakan dalam kajian ini. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa indikator kesejahteran ekonomi di Bali secara umum lebih tinggi dari rata-rata nasional. Selain itu dalam kajian ini dibuktikan bahwa secara empiris belum ada hubungan yang kuat antara audit keuangan khususnya dengan kesejahteraan rakyat.
PENILAIAN INDEKS AKUNTABILITAS INSTANSI PEMERINTAH Dwi Afriyanti; Harpanto Guno Sabanu; Fahrizal Noor
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1123.879 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.10

Abstract

Accountability has been presumed by government agencies as limited to budget realization reporting through the preparation of the financial statements. The entities believe that activities have been adequately accountable if they were fairly presented through financial statements, regardless of whether they improve people's welfare or not. This presumption is different from the accountability perceived by the public. This research aimed to obtain information about accountability measurement best practices that have been applied in government institutions and other countries, that might be useful to formulate a methodology of accountability index measurement in Indonesia government institutions. The research concluded that a system that can assess the level of the government institution's accountability is needed. This system is in the form of indexes which can be used to measure the level of government's ability to achieve its performance for people's welfare. The assessment of the government accountability level could be more comprehensive if the accountability indexes were managed in an integrated way which will lead to obtaining final results or quantitative conclusions. ABSTRAKSelama ini akuntabilitas dipahami oleh instansi pemerintah hanya sebatas pada pelaporan penggunaan anggaran melalui penyusunan laporan keuangan. Entitas tersebut menganggap pertanggungjawaban kegiatan telah dilaksanakan secara memadai, terlepas dari apakah kegiatan yang dilaksanakan memberi manfaat atau tidak terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Hal ini berbeda dengan akuntabilitas yang diharapkan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh informasi tentang bestpractices pengukuran akuntabilitas yang sudah berjalan di instansi pemerintah dan dari negara lain sehingga dapat digunakan untuk merumuskan metodologi penilaian Indeks Akuntabilitas instansi Pemerintah di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan suatu sistem yang dapat menilai tingkat akuntabilitas instansi pemerintah. Sistem tersebut berupa indeks-indeks yang dapat dipergunakan untuk mengukur tingkat kemampuan pemerintah dalam mencapai kinerjanya bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat. Penilaian atas tingkat akuntabilitas pemerintah dapat lebih komprehensif, bila indeks-indeks penilaian yang sudah dilakukan instansi-instansi tersebut dikelola secara terintegrasi, sehingga memperoleh hasil akhir atau simpulan kuantitatif atas penilaian-penilaian tersebut.
KESIMPULAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN KEPATUHAN YANG BERDIRI SENDIRI Catharina Sri Kariningsih; Nalini Asfaroyani; Latifah Dewi Tutiana
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (899.36 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.18

Abstract

BPK has the mandate to conduct audits over management and accountability of the state finance, with one of the audit types is Special Purpose Audit (PDTT). Based on the results of studies conducted by the Directorate of Research and Development of PDTT (Litbang PDTT) in 2011, PDTT consists of, among others, investigative and compliance audit. Compliance audit intended is a compliance audit performed independently. This study aims to provide information about the conclusions in the compliance audit which performed independently. The methodology used is literature study, audit reports analysis, data and information collection through questionnaires and interviews, as well as focus group discussions with practitioners and academician. Based on the study, it can be inferred that factors affecting the quality of the conclusion is the audit objective, the scope of the examination, criteria, materiality, sample and evidence. This study suggests to use ISSAI 4100 Compliance Audit Guidelines –For Audits Performed separately from the Audit of Financial Statements as a reference for the conclusion format.ABSTRAKBPK memiliki mandat untuk melakukan pemeriksaan atas pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab keuangan negara, diantaranya melalui Pemeriksaan Dengan Tujuan Tertentu (PDTT). Berdasarkan hasil kajian yang dilakukan Direktorat Litbang PDTT pada tahun 2011, pemeriksaan yang termasuk dalam PDTT adalah pemeriksaan investigatif dan kepatuhan. Pemeriksaan kepatuhan yang dimaksudkan adalah pemeriksaan kepatuhan yang berdiri sendiri. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi tentang penarikan kesimpulan dalam pemeriksaankepatuhan yang berdiri sendiri tersebut. Metodologi yang digunakan yaitu studi literatur, telaah LHP, pengumpulan data dan informasi melalui kuesioner dan wawancara, serta Focus Group Discussion dengan praktisi dan akademisi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang mendukung kualitas penarikan kesimpulan dalam pemeriksaan kepatuhan yang berdiri sendiri adalah tujuan, lingkup atau cakupan pemeriksaan, kriteria, materialitas, sampel dan bukti pemeriksaan. Studi ini mengusulkan bentuk kesimpulan yang mengacu pada ISSAI 4100 Compliance Audit Guidelines–For Audits Performed separately from the Audit of Financial Statements.
KAJIAN PERMASALAHAN KEBIJAKAN PENETAPAN STATUS BENCANA, KELEMBAGAAN BPBD, DAN PENGELOLAAN BANTUAN PASCA TERBITNYA UU NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2007 Chandra Puspita Kurniawati
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (871.618 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.19

Abstract

A disaster may lead to other disasters. This causes the community to suffer from disaster. The government needs a huge amount of funds to manage disaster and recover the affected communities. However, a number of phenomena that were confirmed to be disaster will provide an impact on funding disaster-related activities and the distribution of resources. In addition, institution related issues on local disaster management agency and unprofessional disaster-related aid management may affect the accountability and transparency of disaster and disaster-related aid management. This study employs a literature review on the policies related to disaster management. The results show that disaster status should be endorsed based on clear definition and parameters as it is mandated on Law No. 24 the Year 2007. In addition, improving local disaster management agency's function and authority and adopting standards or best practices on disaster-related aid management should also be taken into account to promote accountability and transparency of disaster management.ABSTRAKBencana dapat memicu risiko terjadinya bencana yang lain. Kondisi tersebut mengakibatkan setiap tahunnya masyarakat menderita akibat bencana. Pemerintah mutlak memerlukan dana dalam jumlah besar untuk menanggulangi bencana dan memulihkan wilayah pascabencana. Permasalahannya ialah banyaknya kejadian yang ditetapkan sebagai bencana akan berdampak pada pendanaan dan distribusi sumber daya. Selain itu, permasalahan kelembagaan Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) dan pengelolaan bantuan bencana yang tidak profesional dapat berpengaruh pula pada akuntabilitas dan transparansi penyelenggaraan penanggulangan bencana dan pengelolaan bantuan bencana. Kajian ini dilakukan melalui studi literatur tentang kebijakan-kebijakan yang terkait dengan penanggulangan bencana. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa status bencana perlu ditetapkan berdasarkan definisi dan parameter yang jelas sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang -Undang (UU) No. 24 Tahun 2007. Sebagai tambahan, peningkatan fungsi dan wewenang BPBD dan pengadopsian standar atau praktik terbaik pengelolaan bantuan bencana juga perlu dilakukan untuk meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan transparansi penyelenggaraan penanggulangan bencana.
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK DALAM PEMERIKSAAN KINERJA Denny Wahyu Sendjaja; Gregorius Yorrie Rismanto; Nico Andrianto
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1551.623 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.20

Abstract

One of the issues in performance audit is what method to be used if the auditor wants to gain an understanding of policies underlying the entity's activities. This study aims to provide an understanding regarding the policy cycle and its development; to describe the relationship between the governance system, understanding of public policy, and performance audit; and to develop a framework and scope of public policy analysis in the performance audit. The study prepared by Tim Litbang BPK using a literature study, enriched by discussions with speakers from Vrije Universiteit, as well as field trips to ARK and other government entities in The Netherlands. Furthermore, the team developed initial information and analyzed it using ISSAI 3000 perspective. Based on the policy development cycle, the team has developed a framework for public policy analysis on performance audits. The study concluded that the ideal entity's performance evaluation would be to assess the policy before and after the policy implementation (ex-ante and ex-post). Ideally, the performance audit over policy is held by an entity other than the policy's subject itself. BPK meets the criteria. ABSTRAKSalah satu isu dalam pemeriksaan kinerja yang memiliki urgensi tinggi yaitu metode apakah yang dapat digunakan pemeriksa untuk mendapatkan pemahaman atas kebijakan yang melatarbelakangi kegiatan utama entitas. Analisis kebijakan publik dalam pemeriksaan kinerja ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman khususnya mengenai siklus kebijakan dan pengembangannya; menjelaskan hubungan sistem tata kelola pemerintahan, pemahaman kebijakan publik dan pemeriksaan kinerja; serta mengembangkan kerangka kerja dan menjelaskan cakupan analisis kebijakan publik dalam pemeriksaan kinerja. Kajian ini disusun oleh Tim Litbang BPK dengan menggunakan studi literatur mengenai teori-teori kebijakan publik, diskusi dengan nara sumber dari Vrije Universiteit, serta kunjungan lapangan ke Algemene Rekenkamer (ARK) dan beberapa entitas pemerintah lainnya di Belanda. Selanjutnya, Tim mengembangkan informasi awal tersebut serta menganalisisnya dengan mempertimbangkan perspektif ISSAI 3000 Performance Audit Guidelines. Dengan menggunakan siklus pengembangan kebijakan, Tim telah menyusun kerangka kerja analisis kebijakan publik dalam pemeriksaan kinerja. Hasil kajian menyimpulkan bahwa penilaian kinerja entitas yang ideal adalah dengan mengukur suatu kebijakan pada tahap sebelum dan sesudah pelaksanaan kebijakan (ex-ante dan ex-post). Pemeriksaan atas kinerja suatu kebijakan pada tahap ex-ante dan ex-post (kecuali produk kebijakan itu sendiri) secara ideal dilakukan oleh entitas pengendali yang bukan merupakan subjek kebijakan itu sendiri. BPK sebagai badan pemeriksa eksternal pemerintah memenuhi syarat tersebut.
PENGEMBANGAN KAPASITAS PEMERIKSAAN KINERJA DI BPK DAN ANAO, SEBUAH KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN Nico Andrianto
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1331.59 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.21

Abstract

This study compares the performance audit capacity building in the BPK and the one conducted by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO). To do so might not be equal because of their differences in terms of mandate, scale, and the jurisdiction area of audit, but the effort is intended to study the positive achievement by the ANAO to be applied in the BPK. The criteria used in this comparative study is the model developed based on capacity building guidelines issued by the INTOSAI. Analysis method applied in this study is the literature study, which is enriched by the analysis of the various documents obtained from the official website of both government auditor bodies. The results show that 14 of 15 elements of performance audit capacity bulding has been met by the ANAO, while only one is partially met. Meanwhile, in line with a relatively new level of performance audit development, BPK needs to improve continuously its performance audit capacity to meet the INTOSAI’s capacity building guidelines.ABSTRAKKajian ini membandingkan kondisi pengembangan kapasitas pemeriksaan kinerja di BPK dengan Australian National Audit Office (ANAO). Walaupun membandingkan institusi ANAO dan BPK tidak selalu memberikan gambaran yang setara karena berbedanya mandat, skala, dan luasan yurisdiksi pemeriksaan, namun upaya pembandingan ini dimaksudkan untuk mempelajari hal-hal positif yang telah dicapai oleh ANAO supaya bisa diterapkan di BPK. Kriteria yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah model capacity building guidelines yang dikembangkan oleh INTOSAI. Metode kajian yang digunakan adalah studi literatur yang diperkaya dengan hasil analisis berbagai dokumen yang diperoleh dari website resmi kedua lembaga auditor pemerintah tersebut. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa 14 dari 15 unsur pengembangan kapasitas pemeriksaan kinerja telah dipenuhi dan satu unsur belum sepenuhnya dipenuhi oleh ANAO. Sementara itu, sesuai dengan tingkat perkembangan pemeriksaan kinerja yang relatif masih baru, BPK masih perlu secara terus menerus meningkatkan kapasitas pemeriksaan kinerja agar memenuhi standar capacity building guidelines yang dikembangkan oleh INTOSAI 

Page 7 of 16 | Total Record : 158

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2015 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JTAKEN Vol. 9 No. 1 June 2023 JTAKEN 2023: Article in Press 2022: JTAKEN Vol. 8 No. 2 December 2022 2022: JTAKEN Vol. 8 No. 1 June 2022 2021: JTAKEN Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2021 2021: JTAKEN Vol. 7 No. 1 June 2021 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 2 December 2020 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020 2019: JTAKEN Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2019 2019: JTAKEN Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2019 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 2 December 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 2 Desember 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 1 June 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2018 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 2 Desember 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 1 Juni 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 1 June 2017 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2016 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 2 December 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 Juli 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015 More Issue