cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rohmad Adi yulianto
Contact Email
yulianto.fh@uia.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
veritasjournal@uia.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bekasi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah
Published by Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah
ISSN : 24072494     EISSN : 2655979X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
VERITAS Journal of Law Studies (ISSN: 2407-2494) (E-ISSN: 2655-979X)is a national journal that is published by the Postgraduate of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, As-Syafiiyah Islamic University, Indonesia. Published twice a year (March and September). Each issue number (issue) amounts to a minimum of seven (7) the title. The journal endeavors to provide forums for academicians and reseachers who are interested in the discussion of current and future issues on Law and Legal studies (see Focus and Scope). The journal is dedicated to the scholarly study of all aspects of national and international law. The journal is committed to the publication of original research on law as science and practice.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 126 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM AGEN ASURANSI TERKAIT PRAKTIK FRAUD PADA PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI YANG MERUGIKAN NASABAH Desta Putra Widiyanto; fauziah fauziah
VERITAS Vol 7 No 1 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i1.1282

Abstract

Insurance agents are part of human resources that offer products directly to prospective insured. If insurance agents do not have adequate quality, increasing the number of agents each year will cause problems for the parties involved. Formulation of the problem: (1) How is the responsibility of the insurance agent to the insurance company and insurance customers. (2) How is the process of resolving fraud cases conducted by insurance agents at insurance companies. The purpose of this research is to find out how the legal responsibility of insurance agents to companies and customers as well as the process of resolving fraud cases committed by insurance agents. The research method in this writing is as follows: The type of research used by the author in this study is normative juridical research and data collection methods which include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Insurance agents as representatives of insurance companies in marketing products must be responsible to the insurance company and insurance customers regarding the fraud they have committed, which has been regulated in Law Number 40 of 2014 concerning insurance, the Criminal Code and the Code of Law. Civil law. Forms of legal responsibility and settlement, insurance agents can be subject to criminal sanctions, civil sanctions and administrative sanctions, even in the process of settlement sometimes through mediation based on the agreement of the parties. Abstrak Agen asuransi merupakan bagian dari sumber daya manusia yang menawarkan produk secara langsung kepada para calon tertanggung, jika para agen asuransi tidak memiliki kualitas yang memadai maka dengan bertambahnya jumlah agen tiap tahunnya justru akan menimbulkan masalah bagi pihak-pihak yang terkait. Perumusan masalah: (1) Bagaimana tanggung jawab agen asuransi kepada perusahaan asuransi dan nasabah asuransi. (2) Bagaimana proses penyelesaian kasus fraud yang dilakukan agen asuransi pada perusahaan asuransi. Tujuan peneletian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana tanggung jawab hukum agen asuransi kepada perusahaan dan nasabah serta proses penyelesaian kasus fraud yang dilakukan oleh agen asuransi. Metode penelitian dalam penulisan ini sebagai berikut: Jenis penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif serta metode pengumpulan data yang mencakup bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Agen asuransi sebagai perwakilan dari perusahaan asuransi dalam memasarkan produk harus bertanggungjawab kepada perusahaan asuransi dan nasabah asuransi terkait tindakan fraud yang telah dilakukannya, yang telah diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 tentang perasuransian, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Bentuk tanggung jawab hukum dan penyelesaiannya, agen asuransi dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana, sanksi perdata maupun sanksi administratif, bahkan dalam proses penyelesaiannya kadang melalui jalur mediasi berdasarkan kesepakatan para pihak.
PENCEGAHAN MODUS PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILU DALAM PENETAPAN CALON KEPALA DAERAH Arifudin Arifudin; Nurwidyanto .
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.419

Abstract

Determination of candidate at local election is an important stage in the process of democratic regional head election. In the process of determining the facts in Garut Regency Election Year 2018 raises a mode of violation of the code of ethics in the form of money politics. Therefore in this paper formulated the problem is: what factors causing the emergence of violation mode of ethics of election organizers in the determination of candidates for regional heads ?; and how prevention of violation mode of ethics of election organizers in the determination of candidates for regional head ?. In this paper it is concluded that the mode of violation of the code of ethics in the determination of the candidate pair of regional heads is not only caused by the conduct of the election organizer but also caused by the candidate's candidate and the success team that encourage the election organizers to violate the code of ethics. Therefore, an ethics education instrument is required for the candidate of regional head, pre verification of candidate pair of regional head, as well as sanctions for election organizers and prospective candidates of regional head has not been formulated in a legislation.
Perbandingan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Klaster Ketenagakerjaan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan mengenai Status Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Sandy Maldini; Aerlangga Bagus Setiawan; Imam Budi Santoso
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1444

Abstract

Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, mendapat penolakan dan menimbulkan opini-opini ketidak puasan dari sebahagian besar masyarakat Indonesia dengan tingkat persepsi hukum yang berbeda-beda. Namun ada salah satu hal dari permasalahan UU Cipta Kerja ini. Yaitu permasalahan mengenai peluang para pekerja untuk mendapatkan status Karyawan Tetap pasca di sahkannya UU tersebut. Bagaimanakah perbandingan mengenai status Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu dalam UU Ketenagakerjaan. Metode penelitian adalah melalui metode yuridis normatif, yang menitik beratkan pada data sekunder atau data kepustakaan dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Bahwa perbandingan UU ketenagakerjaan dengan UU Cipta kerja merupakan sebuah produk hukum yang dijadikan dalam satu isu besar ekonomi dan investasi, dalam hal ini kluster ketenagakerjaan UU Cipta Kerja justru abai terhadap filosofi dari UU Ketenagakerjaan yang digantikannya.
Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1451

Abstract

ABSTRACT This observe pursuits to evaluate conceptual heritage from the authority of The Religious Court for case of tort in dispute of Islamic financial system and attention of the decide in figuring out from the authority for case of tort in dispute of Islamic financial system. This observe makes use of a version of normative studies. The observe changed into performed via way of means of analyzing the library substances or secondary data. Data had been analyzed the usage of qualitative methods. The evaluation changed into performed via way of means of classifying, evaluating and linking to similarly systematically organized in accordance grooves its discussion. Based at the studies performed changed into concluded as follows: (1) The Religious Court authority, especially on sharia financial system in Law No. three of 2006 on First Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1989 at the Judiciary Religion is a shape of the government's solution to satisfy the want for the presence of the judiciary that handles disputes bobbing up from monetary pastime primarily based totally on sharia Islamic regulation. This association is a shape of responsive prison product as it displays a experience of justice and meet the expectancies of society. Tort case in Islamic economics has now no longer been set in KHES in order that preparations withinside the Civil Code may be used as supply fabric for substantial regulation remains according with the idea of Al Fi'lu Al Dhar and Al Maqasid As Sharia; (2) Consideration of the decide in figuring out from the authority for case of tort in dispute of Islamic financial system is that the man or woman and/or prison entities which can be events to the dispute have entered right into a prison dating this is primarily based totally on Islamic concepts and tort has a near connection or due to the prison dating.
Pemanfaatan Hak Guna Usaha untuk Pariwisata dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Pulau Pari Kepulauan Seribu DKI Jakarta Martini Martini; Efridani Lubis
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1581

Abstract

Abstrak Pulau Pari Bersama-sama dengan pulau-pulau di sekitarnya menyediakan berbagai fasilitas wisata alam dan bahari. Berdasarkan Keputusan Gubernur DKI tahun 1991, yang menetapkan fungsi tanah di Pari sudah dibagi yakni 10% untuk penelitian, 50% untuk kawasan wisata, serta 40% untuk pemukiman. Namun berbeda dengan pulau lainnya, pada umumnya hak atas tanah di Pulau Pari adalah tanah girik yang menurut penelitian sebelumnya telah beralih ke pihak ketiga tanpa sepengetahuan pemegang girik melalui jual beli secara resmi melalui kelurahan. Ombudsman telah melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap kasus ini berdasrkan permohonan warga dan menemukan adanya tindak mal-administrasi yang dilakukan Kantor Pertanahan Jakarta Utara dalam menerbitkan 62 SHM dan 14 SHGB atas nama PT Bumi Pari Asri di Pulau Pari. Oleh karena itu, perlu diteliti bagaimana hak-hak masyarakat setempat terhadap penyelenggaraan kegiatan pariwisata dimaksud berikut mekanisme pengembangan lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif adalah pendekatan dengan mengutamakan dan berdasarkan bahan hukum utama dengan cara menelaah teori-teori, konsep-konsep, asas-asas hukum serta peraturan perundang-undangan, termasuk hasil putusan pengadilan yang berhubungan dengan penelitian ini ditunjang dengan observasi dan wawancara. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaturan dan perlindungan masyarakat di Pulau Pari Kepulauan Seribu dalam mengembangkan aspek wisata di wilayah tersebut untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat setempat. Abstract Pari Island as one of island in Pulau Seribu (Thousand Island) strategic for natural tourism or ecotourism and marine tourism with many supporting facilities. Based on Keputusan Gubernur (Governor Degree) Jakarta District in 1991 regulates that land in Pari Island has been divided into 3 categories, i.e., 10% for research, 50% for tourism, and 40% for housing. The difference with other lands around though, most of land on Pari Island is girik (customary system) that according to previous research transferred to third parties without resident’s consent under legal purchasing system made by local official. In this sense, Ombudsman has evaluated respond to resident application. The institute found mal-administration conducted by North Jakarta Land Office in verified 62 ownership certificates and 14 building right certificates in Pari Island on behalf of PT Bumi Pari Asri. Therefore, it is necessary to study the impact of the policies to tourism activities along with mechanism to develop further. This research conducted using qualitative method with legal normative approach that approach prioritized main legal documents through theories, concepts, and legal principles review along with related regulations including court decisions supported by observation and interview approach using SWOT. The result shows Ownership and Building Rights could be benefit for the residents only if the rights returned to its function according to regulations used Ombudsman decision.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pengadaan Tanah Rumah Sakit Sumber Waras Tahun 2014 untuk Kepentingan Umum oleh Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta Harun Harun; Muhammad Fahruddin
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1623

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research discusses the juridical study of land acquisition for the public interest in DKI Jakarta Province. This research uses a normative juridical method with an approach to reviewing laws and regulations and the President's Rule with the aim of exploring the rules governing the implementation of land acquisition for development in the public interest, which can be seen from legal sources, legal subjects, legal objects, characteristics and forms. sanctions, as well as the formulation of the criminal and criminal sanctions itself. The results of this study are in the Province of DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Keywords: Juridical Review, Public Interest, Presidential Regulation No.71 of 2012 ABSTRAK Penelitian ini membahas tentang kajian Yuridis pengadaan Lahan untuk kepentingan umum di Propinsi DKI Jakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kajian peraturan perundang-undangan dan Peratutan Presiden dengan Tujuuan untuk mendalami tentang aturan yang mengatur tentang Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum, yang dapat dilihat dari sumber hukum, subjek hukum, objek hukum, sifat dan bentuk sanski, serta rumusan pidana dan sanksi pidana itu sendiri. Hasil penelitian ini adalah di Propinsi DKI Jakarta Indonesia. Kata kunci :Tinjauan Yuridis, Kepentingan Umum, Peraturan Presiden No.71 tahun 2012
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Saham yang Tidak Menyetor Modal pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam Perspektif Keadilan Rosyida Setiani; Siti Nur Intihani
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1639

Abstract

Penelitian mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap Pemegang Saham yang tidak menyetorkan modal pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam perspektif keadilan bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum Pemegang Saham yang tidak setor modal pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam perspektif keadilan. Metode yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif, yaitu mengkaji data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Hasil penelitian adalah kewajiban Pemegang saham diatur dalam Pasal 33-34 UUPT, yaitu : Pemegang saham harus menyetor penuh atas modal yang dtempatkan pada Perseroan, penyetoran modal dibuktikan dengan bukti penyetoran yang sah antara lain bukti setoran ke dalam rekening bank atas nama Perseroan, data dari laporan keuangan yang telah diaudit oleh akuntan, atau neraca Perseroan yang ditandatangani oleh Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris. Pemegang saham yang tidak setor modal tidak dapat menjalankan hak-haknya sebagai pemegang saham, karena tidak dapat membuktikan adanya penyetoran saham pada perseroan. Upaya hukum dilakukan dengan : 1) mengajukan RUPSLB melalui Penetapan Pengadilan, 2) Mengajukan gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum kepada Perseroan, 3) Melapor ke pihak kepolisian atas dugaan tindak pidana penggelapan deviden. Dari Putusan Pengadilan, Majelis Hakim menyatakan bahwa pemegang saham yang tidak menyetorkan modal, maka hak-haknya ditunda sampai dengan yang bersangkutan menyetorkan sahamnya ke dalam rekening perusahaan, Pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim Pengadilan, apabila persyaratan kepemilikan saham telah ditetapkan dalam Anggaran Dasar dan ternyata persyaratan itu “tidak dipenuhi”. Pihak yang memperoleh kepemilikan saham tersebut, tidak dapat menjalankan hak selaku pemegang saham; antara lain hak untuk dicatat dalam daftar pemegang saham (selanjutnya DPS), hak untuk menghadiri dan mengeluarkan suara dalam RUPS atau hak untuk menerima dividen yang dibagikan. Dan saham tersebut tidak diperhitungkan dalam kourum yang harus dicapai sesuai dengan ketentuan undang-undang ini dan Anggaran Dasar”. Perlindungan hukum tetap diberikan kepada pemegang saham yang belum setor modal yaitu dinyatakan sah sebagai pemegang saham, namun untuk hak-hak sebagai pemegang saham belum dapat diberikan. Hal mana sesuai asas keadilan.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pencabutan Hak Kewarganegaraan Mantan Anggota Organisasi Militan Ekstremis (ISIS) Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Aturan Kewarganegaraan Abdullah Raden Aji Haqqi; Rohmad Adi Yulianto; Damrah Mamang
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1641

Abstract

Citizenship is a legal bond between a person and a country. Citizenship gives people an identity. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that "everyone has the right to a nationality", thus this declaration recognizes the importance of citizenship legally and practically for the fulfillment of human rights. Therefore, governments must work to ensure that everyone has a nationality. Former members of extremist militant organizations themselves can be interpreted as military groups (Army, Navy and Air Force), and militias and volunteer corps that meet these four requirements, are called “Former members”. They are justified in actively participating in hostilities. Also included in the ex-member group are: residents of an area that has not been occupied by the enemy, who spontaneously took up arms when organizing themselves, and carried weapons openly. Extremism is not really new. There has been a lot of extremist behavior that is usually associated with terrorist behavior and attacks against a group, both in Indonesia and abroad. Extremist behavior is slightly different from criminal behavior in general. The crimes committed by extremists are crimes based on the path they have chosen regarding their way of seeing the world. Law number 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, it is stated in article 23 that Indonesian citizens will lose their citizenship in several ways, starting from the person concerned obtaining another citizenship, entering the service of a foreign army, entering the service of a foreign country, swearing allegiance to a foreign country. , participating in the elections of foreign countries, and several other matters mentioned in Chapter IV of the law. So even though it is true that ISIS itself is not a country as described in the writing of this thesis, this cannot be used as a basis for guiding that an Indonesian citizen who is a member of ISIS cannot lose his citizenship because it is clearly regulated in both laws and regulations. The government is what causes the Indonesian citizen to lose his citizenship automatically, not because of certain individuals who can decide whether or not a person's citizenship is lost or not.
Efektivitas Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Atas Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Yoga Saprudin Juliansah; Suryana Marta
VERITAS Vol 8 No 1 (2022): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v8i1.899

Abstract

Free and periodic elections have been characterized by a system of democratic states as one of the means for ensuring rights for citizens, there is often a breach in Indonesia's electoral proceedings such as the violation of criminal elections. So the government issued a special bill used to regulate the process of holding elections in 2019, specifically to sanction the perpetrators of the elections violation, using 2017's no. 7 elections. The study adopted the normatif juridical research approach, which normatif's own jurisdiction was a law study that examined written laws from various aspects. This approach approach deals with legal matters based on the normative rules that are associated with the existing circumstances of society. By viewing a case in the public with regard to elections and linking the 2017 rule number 7 of elections for the application of sanctions against the perpetrators of the elections. Legal certainty in the implementation of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the general elections under the 2017 rule of elections can be set as an example for the public to avoid committing similar crimes or others, with a sufficient number of cases to be solved. Key words: sanction setting, effective application of criminal sanctions.
Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Pencurian dengan Modus Carding Berdasarkan Pasal 362 KUHP Jo. Undang–undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Atas Perubahan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Agung Mahardika; Uu Idjuddin Solihin
VERITAS Vol 8 No 1 (2022): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v8i1.900

Abstract

This journal discusses the consideration of judges in deciding a crime of one of the Cyber ​​Crime crimes namely Carding. Especially in the case of regulating the Carding crime, the factors of the perpetrators committing the Caeding crime, as well as the consideration of the judge in giving a verdict on the Carding crime. research conducted by studying and examining library legal materials, data collection is done by examining secondary data using primary legal data in the form of a court decision. As well as secondary data. Carding is a crime that is fairly new in Cyber ​​Crime which is a transnational crime but occupies the highest position in Indonesia compared to other Cyber ​​Crime crimes. there is no specific regulation or regulation regarding the crime of Carding despite the existence of Law Number 11 of 2018 as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and the application of Articles of the Criminal Code but are deemed inappropriate. Law enforcers often have difficulty in overcoming and mismatch in upholding in preventing Carding cases, especially judges to uphold justice which is actually proven or not proven by a defendant committing a crime based on the judge's decision. Keywords: Carding Criminal Acts, Judge Considerations

Page 9 of 13 | Total Record : 126

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2016 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9 No 2 (2023): VERITAS Vol 9 No 1 (2023): VERITAS Vol 8 No 2 (2022): VERITAS Vol 8 No 1 (2022): VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS Vol 7 No 1 (2021): VERITAS Vol 6 No 2 (2020): VERITAS Vol 6 No 1 (2020): VERITAS Vol 5 No 2 (2019): VERITAS Vol 5 No 1 (2019): VERITAS Vol 4 No 2 (2018): VERITAS Vol 4 No 1 (2018): VERITAS Vol 3 No 2 (2017): VERITAS Vol 3 No 1 (2017): VERITAS Vol 2 No 2 (2016): VERITAS Vol 2 No 1 (2016): VERITAS More Issue