cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Erni Agustin
Contact Email
media_iuris@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
media_iuris@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Media Iuris
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26215225     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Media Iuris E-ISSN (2621-5225) is an open-access-peer-reviewed legal journal affiliated with the Faculty of Law of Airlangga University, which was published for the first time in 2018 in the online version. The purpose of this journal is as a forum for legal scholars, lawyers and practitioners to contribute their ideas to be widely disseminated for the development of legal science in Indonesia. This journal is published three times a year in February, June and October. Scope of articles ranging from legal issues in the fields of business law, constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, international law, comparative law, and other legal fields.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS" : 10 Documents clear
Front Matter Volume 5 No. 2, June 2022 Front Matter
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Front Matter Volume 5 No. 2, June 2022
Back Matter Vol. 5 No. 2, June 2022 Back Matter
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Back Matter Vol. 5 No. 2, June 2022
What Augmented Reality Would Face Today? The Legal Challenges to the Protection of Intellectual Property in Virtual Space Masitoh Indriani; Liah Basuki Anggraeni
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.29339

Abstract

AbstractAugmented Reality (AR) refers to a display of a real-world environment whose elements are augmented by one or more layers of text, data, symbols, images, or other graphical display elements. AR technology is always associated with online games. Beyond online gaming, AR has become part of daily life and affects every aspect of how society interacts with technology. In retail and marketing, AR and other virtual technologies play a very important role in saving costs. AR is also used in the education and medical sector, also in preventing crime. AR is even further used for humanitarian activities to reach remote areas affected by natural disasters and save human lives. Considered a new technology, the commercialization of AR may bring incredible business opportunities as well as potential legal risks. In the context of Intellectual Property (IP), AR systems and services can embody a variety of forms of IP. Meanwhile, the operation of AR systems in virtual spaces is creating issues about how to deal with data breaches and privacy. By using doctrinal methods, this paper will explore the legal challenge of AR in the context of IP protection in the virtual space and investigate the potential liability caused by the failure of AR systems from the Indonesian legal perspective.Keywords: Augmented Reality; Intellectual Property; Legal; Virtual Space.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Tanda Terima Atas Penyerahan Sertipikat Hak Milik Kukuh Leksono Suminaring Aditya; Valerieo Ezra Hutagalung; Julienna Hartono; Indah Permatasari Kosuma
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.32261

Abstract

AbstractOne of the most important authority of the public notary as stated in Article 15 Law Number 2 Years 2014 is the deed storage. In practice, the issuance of a receipt by a notary in the process of submitting a Certificate of Ownership for transactional purposes related to land and buildings, often creates problems. Not infrequently notaries have to deal with civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings that originate from the receipts they issue. Therefore, this paper try to analyze the public notary liability so that they could uphold the carefulness principle in conducting their authority. Keywords: Public Notary; Authority; Receipt; Liability. AbstrakHal yang berkaitan dengan kewenangan notaris sebagaimana tercantum dalam Pasal 15 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris adalah menyimpan suatu Akta. Dalam praktek, pengeluaran bukti tanda terima oleh seorang notaris dalam proses penyerahan Sertipikat Hak Milik untuk kepentingan transaksional yang berkaitan dengan tanah dan bangunan, seringkali mendatangkan masalah. Tidak jarang notaris harus berhadapan dengan gugatan perdata dan proses pidana yang bersumber dari tanda terima yang ia keluarkan. Tulisan ini berupaya untuk menguraikan tanggung jawab seorang notaris, sehingga mereka dalam praktek bisa menjunjung tinggi prinsip kehati-hatian.Kata Kunci: Notaris; Kewenangan; Tanda Terima; Pertanggung jawaban.
Penentuan Kesalahan Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Perpajakan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat No.: 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Brt) I Made Walesa Putra; Marcus Priyo Gunarto; Dahliana Hasan
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.33369

Abstract

AbstractThe Indonesian Criminal Code does not recognize corporate criminal liability. Conceptually, the perpetrator, who commits a criminal act must have a fault to be liable, including corporation as the subject of criminal law. The criminal sanctions impostion of PT. Gemilang Sukses Garmindo (PT. GSG) based on West Jakarta District Court through the decision number: 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Brt, it was the second criminal decision against the corporation in the taxation sector, after the Asian Agri Group (AAG) decision. This study aims to analyze the regulation of corporate criminal liability in tax laws and to analyze the basis of judge considerations in determining the corporate guilt of PT GSG. The type of research is normative research with a statutory and case approach. The results of study showed that the Tax Law has not explicitly regulated the corporation as the subject of tax criminal law and there was an inaccuracy in the judge’s consideration of the PT.GSG criminal decision. The determination of corporate fault can be based on the material perpetrator’s fault and the internal requirements of the corporation. Finally, identification theory can be used as the basis for justifying the imposition of a corporate criminal sanction to PT. GSG.Keywords: Corporate Fault; Criminal Act; Taxation. AbstrakKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Indonesia belum mengakui pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Secara konsepsi, untuk dapat dipertanggungjawabkan pidana pelaku yang melakukan tindak pidana harus memiliki kesalahan, termasuk pula subjek hukum pidana korporasi. Pengenaan pidana terhadap PT. Gemilang Sukses Garmindo (PT. GSG) berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat No.: 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Brt, merupakan putusan pidana terhadap korporasi yang kedua di bidang perpajakan setelah putusan korporasi Asian Agri Group (AAG). Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan pertanggungjawaan pidana korporasi dalam perundang-undangan perpajakan serta menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam penentuan kesalahan Korporasi PT GSG. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Undang-Undang Perpajakan belum mengatur eksplisit korporasi sebagai subjek hukum pidana perpajakan serta ada ketidaktepatan dasar pertimbangan hakim putusan pidana PT. GSG. Penentuan kesalahan korporasi dapat berdasarkan kesalahan pelaku materiil beserta syarat internal korporasi. Pada akhirnya, teori identifikasi sesungguhnya dapat digunakan sebagai dasar pembenaran penjatuhan pidana korporasi PT. GSG.Kata Kunci: Kesalahan Korporasi; Tindak Pidana; Perpajakan.
Bisnis Sektor Sumber Daya Alam dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia: Realitas dan Tantangan Indah Dwi Qurbani; Ilham Dwi Rafiqi
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.34348

Abstract

AbstractThe current research aims to investigate the realization of human rights in the natural resources business sector in Indonesia. Global demands and the rise of investments have resulted in the exercise of the natural resources business, which frequently intersects and affects the fulfillment of human rights in some cases. A normative legal research method was used by means of statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The results had shown that the real-life practices of human rights fulfilment in the natural resources sector did not run optimally, and even violated the principles of Business and Human (UNGP), in terms of protection, respect, and restoration of human rights. In fact, natural resources management policies, the most widely issued policies in Indonesia, had been the real challenges by themselves. The regulatory framework in the natural resources sector, tendentiously centralized, pragmatic, and instrumental, did need reform. This issue implied the rise of pathological problems, such as pollution and environmental damages, violence against vulnerable groups, marginalization of indigenous peoples due to land and ownership conflicts, and social inequality. In addition, adequate norms of action were needed in terms of due diligence and restoration of human rights in the natural resources business sector.Keywords: Human Right; Natural Resources Business; Realities; Challenges. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui realisasi HAM pada bisnis sektor sumber daya alam di Indonesia. Tuntutan global dan peningkatan investasi mengakibatkan pelaksanaan bisnis di sektor sumber daya alam sering bersingungan dan berdampak pada pemenuhan HAM. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan jenis pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa realitas pemenuhan HAM di sektor sumber daya alam tidak berjalan secara optimal dan bahkan melanggar prinsip-prinsip Bisnis dan HAM dalam Panduan Persatuan Bangsa-Bangsa mengenai Bisnis dan HAM (United Nation Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights/UNGP), baik prinsip perlindungan, penghormatan, dan pemulihan HAM. Kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya alam merupakan kebijakan yang paling banyak diterbitkan di Indonesia menjadi tantangan tersendiri. Kerangka regulasi di sektor sumber daya alam yang cenderung sentralis, pragmatis, dan instrumentalis perlu dilakukan reformasi. Implikasi yang ditimbulkan akibat hal itu adalah terjadi berbagai patologi permasalahan seperti pencemaran dan kerusakan lingkungan, kekerasan terhadap kelompok rentan, marginalisasi, dan masyarakat hukum adat akibat konflik lahan dan kepemilikan, kesenjangan sosial, dan lain sebagainya. Selain itu, dibutuhkan norma aksi yang memadai dalam hal uji tuntas dan pemulihan HAM pada bisnis sektor sumber daya alam.Kata Kunci: HAM; Bisnis Sektor Sumber Daya Alam; Pemenuhan dan Tantangan
The Dilemma in COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights or A Life? Debby Kristin; Chloryne Trie Isyana Dewi
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.34349

Abstract

AbstractAccess to medicines and health facilities is a form of fulfillment of the right to health which, if not fulfilled, will result in the loss of the right to life. During the time of COVID-19 that hit the whole world, data released by WHO stated that 4,592,934 people had died from COVID-19, and the number was growing globally every day. However, only 5,352,927,296 doses of vaccines have been administered worldwide, with most going to developed countries. Experts predict the global population will be fully vaccinated by at least September 2023. WHO research shows that through vaccination, the rate of transmission of the disease can be reduced, and even if the subject is infected, vaccination can still reduce mortality and severity. However, its manufacture and distribution are protected by several intellectual property rights (IPR) legal instruments, which have resulted in several Global South countries, especially Indonesia being late in the vaccination process. This article aims to criticize how vaccine distribution is hampered due to regulations related to IPR, namely patents and trade secret. The author uses normative juridical research methods to answer the problems in this study by focusing on literature research and secondary data related to vaccination and the right to health which have implications for the right to human life. Comparison with other countries, especially South Africa fighting HIV/AIDS for years using the flexibilities of TRIPs, is also the subject of this research. This research describes how the Global North countries have a significant role in distributing the COVID-19 vaccine to the Global South. The delay in allotment due to regulations related to Intellectual Property Rights causes violations of several fundamental rights.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Insolvency Test; Principle of Balance.
Politik Hukum Perubahan Norma Perizinan dan Iklim Investasi Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Menggunakan Metode Omnibus Law Angga Dwi Prasetyo; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Shinta Hadiyantina
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.36165

Abstract

AbstractThe Job Creation Law passed and enacted in 2020 is a momentual result with the expectation that the Law will create jobs. But after the passage of the Job Creation Law with the use of the omnibus law method, it produced various responses and reactions from the community so that the community also among academics produced pros and cons to the Law. In addition, after the Uncang-Cipta Kerja Law was passed, it has had an impact on the elimination of industries included in the negative investment list, triggering an increase in foreign investment in Indonesia. Based on the description, a problem was formulated: what is the legal politics behind the change in licensing norms and the investment climate in the Job Creation Law using the omnibus law method. The research method used in the writing of this article is the use of legal normative research. The source of legal materials used includes 3 (three) types of legal materials, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal data collection techniques use a literature research model that analyzes the legal data studied in the form of qualitative and descriptive content analysis. The results showed that the government’s efforts to reduce duplication of regulations through comprehensive legislation are expected to accelerate licensing.Keywords: Omnibus Law; UU Cipta Kerja; Licensing; Investment. AbstrakUndang-Undang Cipta Kerja yang disahkan dan diundangkan pada tahun 2020 merupakan suatu hasil momentual dengan harapan dari Undang-Undang tersebut ialah menciptakan lapangan kerja. Tetapi pasca pengesahan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dengan penggunaan metode omnibus law tersebut menghasilkan berbagai tanggapan dan reaksi dari lapisan masyarakat sehingga masyarakat pun juga dikalangan akademisi menghasilkan pro kontra terhadap Undang-undang tersebut. Selain itu, pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja disahkan telah berdampak pada penghapusan industri yang masuk dalam daftar negatif investasi sehingga memicu peningkatan investasi asing di Indonesia. Berdasarkan uraian tersebut, dirumuskan masalah: apa politik hukum dibalik perubahan norma perizinan dan iklim investasi dalam UU Cipta kerja menggunakan metode omnibus law. Metode penelitian yang dipakai pada penulisan artikel ini ialah penggunaan penelitian normatif hukum. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi 3 (tiga) jenis bahan hukum, yakni materi hukum primer, materi hukum sekunder, serta materi hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data hukum menggunakan model penelitian kepustakaan yang menganalisis data hukum yang diteliti berupa analisis isi kualitatif dan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa upaya pemerintah untuk mengurangi duplikasi regulasi melalui undang-undang yang komprehensif diharapkan dapat mempercepat perizinan.Kata Kunci: Omnibus Law; UU Cipta Kerja; Perizinan; Investasi.
Exit Plan Terhadap Clerical Eror Pada Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap: Sebuah Upaya Preventif Terwujudnya Putusan Non-Executable Ghansham Anand; Xavier Nugraha
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.36402

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to firstly analyze clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force and secondly analyze related legal remedies for clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force. This research is a doctrinal research with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results of this study are that first, a clerical error in a court decision that has permanent legal force is an error that is minor in nature or in the form of an accident and is not related to the substance of the judge’s legal considerations and this error can be corrected by the court, even after the judge makes a decision. . Second, legal remedies that can be filed against typos in decisions that have legal force consist of various kinds, but generally the right one is through an application. It is based on nature, complexity, time, cost, and evidentiary.Keywords: Clerical Eror; Non-Executable Judgement; Legal Action. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk pertama menganalisis kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap dan kedua menganalisis terkait permohonan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertama kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) pada putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap adalah kesalahan yang sifatnya ringan atau berbentuk ketidaksengajaan dan tidak berkaitan dengan substansi pertimbangan hukum hakim dan kesalahan ini dapat diperbaiki oleh pengadilan, meskipun setelah hakim menjatuhkan putusan. Kedua, exit plan yang dapat diajukan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan pada putusan yang berkekuatan hukum terdiri dari beraneka ragam, namun umumnya yang tepat adalah melalui permohonan. Hal ini didasarkan pada hakikat, kompleksitas, waktu, biaya, dan pembuktian. Kata Kunci: Clerical Eror; Putusan Non-Executable; Exit Plan.
Aspek Hukum dan HAM pada Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan Bagi Kepentingan Pembangunan Strategis: Menyoal Pemulihan dan Jaminan Ketidakberulangan Maskun; Hasbi Assidiq; Siti Nurhaliza Bachril; Nurul Habaib Al-Mukarramah
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.36576

Abstract

AbstractVarious strategic development interests aimed at propelling economic growth in Indonesia are increasingly being realized. A number of facilities are offered to enable the realization of this development, including provision of land through allocation of forest areas. This paper is devoted to normatively analyze the legal provisions regarding the use of forest areas for the realization of various strategic development projects, and to uncover related problems that arise at the normative level. By applying normative legal research methods, the main findings show that there are various legal issues revolving around the use of forest areas for strategic development purposes, including efforts to legitimize the illegal use of forest areas, absence of legal provisions regarding effective remedy from such a violation of forest areas utilization, and absence of legal guarantees for non-recurrence of the violation. These conditions contradict the principles contained in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs).Keywords: Strategic Development; Use of Forest Areas; Recovery and Non-Recurrence Guarantee. AbstrakBerbagai bentuk pembangunan strategis untuk mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia semakin gencar direalisasikan. Berbagai kemudahan bagi realisasi pembangunan tersebut diberikan termasuk dalam penyediaan lahan, salah satunya dengan mengalokasikan kawasan hutan. Tulisan ini hendak meninjau secara normatif berbagai ketentuan mengenai penggunaan kawasan hutan bagi realisasi proyek pembangunan yang bersifat strategis, dan permasalahan terkait yang timbul dalam tataran normatif. Dengan mengaplikasikan metode penelitian hukum normatif, temuan utama menunjukkan terdapat berbagai permasalahan dalam penggunaan kawasan hutan bagi kepentingan pembangunan strategis termasuk upaya legitimasi penggunaan kawasan hutan yang ilegal, belum adanya ketentuan hukum mengenai pemulihan dalam hal terjadi pelanggaran penggunaan kawasan hutan demikian, dan absennya jaminan hukum ketidakberulangan pelanggaran tersebut. Kondisi-kondisi ini secara keseluruhan bertentangan dengan Prinsip-Prinsip Panduan Bisnis dan Hak Asasi Manusia (UNGPs).Kata Kunci: Pembangunan Strategis; Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan; Pemulihan dan Jaminan ketidakb- erulangan  

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 1SpecialIssue (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): MEDIA IURIS More Issue