cover
Contact Name
Ridwan Arifin
Contact Email
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
+6281225294499
Journal Mail Official
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Kampus Timur, Gedung K, Kampus Sekaran Gunungpati, Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Law Journal
ISSN : 22526536     EISSN : 27224503     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj
Core Subject : Social,
Unnes Law Journal (Unnes L.J.) is a double-blind peer-reviewed legal journal (ISSN Print 2252-6536 ISSN Online 2722-4503) publishes research and review papers concerning to Legal Studies. Unnes L.J. published biannually by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang on April & October. Focus and Scope of Unnes L.J. are concerning (but are not limited to): Criminal Law, Private Law, Administrative Law, International Law, Procedure Law, Tax Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, State Administrative Law, Law Land, Insurance Law, Law and Human Rights, Politics of Law, Sociology of Law, Anthropology of Law, Philosophy of Law, Agrarian Law, Forestry Law, Law of the Seas, Ocean Law, Climate Change Law, Maritime Law, Diplomatic Law, Humanitarian Law, Special Criminal Law, Economic Law, Business Law, Consumer Protection Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Capital Market Law, Comparative Law, Regional Financial Law, Regional Autonomy Law, Sharia Economic Law, Health Law, Law and Society, Law and Forensics, Criminology, Victimology, Penitentiary Law, Law and Technology, Law and Gender Studies, and other related issues on Law in broader aspects (including Social, Economic, Politic, Security, Education, and Culture).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 18 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)" : 18 Documents clear
Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat Cipta, Rachmadan Eka; Masyhar, Ali
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38746

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.
Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat Cipta, Rachmadan Eka; Masyhar, Ali
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38746

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.
The Authority of Government Officials in Delegating and Mandating Tumuhulawa, Arifin; Moonti, Roy Marthen
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38778

Abstract

Power sharing vertically in a unitary state has its consequence for the existence of the environment of both central and local governments. By the existence, another consequence appears which is the relationship between central government and local government in order to avoid the overlap of the authority implementation. One of the crucial aspects in democratic state of law (democratischerechtsstaat) is legality principle (legaliteitsbeginsel). It means that each legal action of the government should be based on the applicable laws and regulations or the authority given by the applicable regulations. The problem statements and the aims of this research are to find out the authority of the Government Officials in running the government affairs and to investigate the meaning of delegating and mandating conducted by the government officials. Authority is the formal power owned by administration boards and/or officials or other state administrators to act in public law report including some competences. The basic principles of authority are first, the administration officials act and make decision based on their authority; second, the authority to use should be accounted for and tested by both legal norm and legal principle. Delegation is defined as delegating authority from the higher board and/or government officials to the subordinates in which the responsibility and liability is switched completely to the delegates. Mandate does not contain the transfer of authority. It is only the mandator gives his/her authority to another person (mandatary) to make decision or take actions on his/her behalf.
The Authority of Government Officials in Delegating and Mandating Tumuhulawa, Arifin; Moonti, Roy Marthen
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38778

Abstract

Power sharing vertically in a unitary state has its consequence for the existence of the environment of both central and local governments. By the existence, another consequence appears which is the relationship between central government and local government in order to avoid the overlap of the authority implementation. One of the crucial aspects in democratic state of law (democratischerechtsstaat) is legality principle (legaliteitsbeginsel). It means that each legal action of the government should be based on the applicable laws and regulations or the authority given by the applicable regulations. The problem statements and the aims of this research are to find out the authority of the Government Officials in running the government affairs and to investigate the meaning of delegating and mandating conducted by the government officials. Authority is the formal power owned by administration boards and/or officials or other state administrators to act in public law report including some competences. The basic principles of authority are first, the administration officials act and make decision based on their authority; second, the authority to use should be accounted for and tested by both legal norm and legal principle. Delegation is defined as delegating authority from the higher board and/or government officials to the subordinates in which the responsibility and liability is switched completely to the delegates. Mandate does not contain the transfer of authority. It is only the mandator gives his/her authority to another person (mandatary) to make decision or take actions on his/her behalf.
Supervision by the Financial Services Authority on Investment-Based Life Insurance (Unit Link) Fajrina, Rizky Noor; Waspiah, Waspiah
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38802

Abstract

Problems with unit-linked life insurance products such as product transparency where the agent does not provide a detailed explanation regarding the characteristics, benefits, risks, and costs of unit-linked life insurance. This study aims to describe the protection of unit link life insurance in Indonesia and the supervision of the Financial Services Authority, the constraints faced and the steps that must be taken so that the insurance business can run well. This study uses a qualitative, sociological juridical approach. Primary data sources were taken by interview, observation, and documentation. While secondary data obtained from legislation, books, journals, scientific articles related to research. The results showed that: (1) The protection of the unit link life insured in Indonesia is not yet in accordance with the existing regulations. Life insurance agents who violate Marketers Standards of Practice and Code of Conduct may be subject to sanctions. Preventive and repressive efforts are carried out by the Financial Services Authority in order to protect the insured. (2) Supervision of the Financial Services Authority in the insurance business is microprudential supervision which, by its nature, is divided into prudential supervision and market conduct supervision. The conclusions in this study: (1) The protection of life insurance for unit link in Indonesia is not yet fully in accordance with the applicable regulations, this is due to several life insurance agents that do not meet the applicable rules.
Supervision by the Financial Services Authority on Investment-Based Life Insurance (Unit Link) Fajrina, Rizky Noor; Waspiah, Waspiah
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38802

Abstract

Problems with unit-linked life insurance products such as product transparency where the agent does not provide a detailed explanation regarding the characteristics, benefits, risks, and costs of unit-linked life insurance. This study aims to describe the protection of unit link life insurance in Indonesia and the supervision of the Financial Services Authority, the constraints faced and the steps that must be taken so that the insurance business can run well. This study uses a qualitative, sociological juridical approach. Primary data sources were taken by interview, observation, and documentation. While secondary data obtained from legislation, books, journals, scientific articles related to research. The results showed that: (1) The protection of the unit link life insured in Indonesia is not yet in accordance with the existing regulations. Life insurance agents who violate Marketers Standards of Practice and Code of Conduct may be subject to sanctions. Preventive and repressive efforts are carried out by the Financial Services Authority in order to protect the insured. (2) Supervision of the Financial Services Authority in the insurance business is microprudential supervision which, by its nature, is divided into prudential supervision and market conduct supervision. The conclusions in this study: (1) The protection of life insurance for unit link in Indonesia is not yet fully in accordance with the applicable regulations, this is due to several life insurance agents that do not meet the applicable rules.
Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act) Saputro, Baruna Poking Bagus
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38803

Abstract

The specification in the study uses a qualitative analytical descriptive approach and uses a type of doctrinal legal research with normative legal research methods on synchronization and fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes. The results of research and discussion in the thesis are: First, contains synchronization of public information dispute settlement based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986regardingState Administrative Courts as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by Law Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness. Second, it contains legal remedies that are fair in resolving public information disputes. Conclusions based on the results of research and discussion include: First, synchronizing the settlement of public information disputes based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986 regarding State Administrative Courts as amended by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by the Republic of Indonesia Law Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness can be done with a juridical analysis of the competence and position of the State Administrative Court and Information Commission, as well as legal synchronization of the relevant Law. Second, fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes are carried out by juridical analysis based on the theory of justice. Finally, the author gives advice in the form of legislative review efforts to amend the relevant Law, based on apolitical configuration in democratic orders to be able to produce responsive legal products for the realization of legal certainty and justice.
Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act) Saputro, Baruna Poking Bagus
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38803

Abstract

The specification in the study uses a qualitative analytical descriptive approach and uses a type of doctrinal legal research with normative legal research methods on synchronization and fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes. The results of research and discussion in the thesis are: First, contains synchronization of public information dispute settlement based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986regardingState Administrative Courts as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by Law Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness. Second, it contains legal remedies that are fair in resolving public information disputes. Conclusions based on the results of research and discussion include: First, synchronizing the settlement of public information disputes based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986 regarding State Administrative Courts as amended by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by the Republic of Indonesia Law Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness can be done with a juridical analysis of the competence and position of the State Administrative Court and Information Commission, as well as legal synchronization of the relevant Law. Second, fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes are carried out by juridical analysis based on the theory of justice. Finally, the author gives advice in the form of legislative review efforts to amend the relevant Law, based on apolitical configuration in democratic orders to be able to produce responsive legal products for the realization of legal certainty and justice.
The Evaluation of Early Marriage Law Renewal in Indonesia Ilahi, Andi Hidayat Anugrah
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.43000

Abstract

The study objective is to evaluate early marriage law reform implementation compared to the five regions with the highest Indonesian cases. This research is descriptive using a literature study. The data source consists of primary data consisting of laws. 16 of 2019 and the Decree Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 of the Constitutional Court and secondary legal sources from books, websites, journals, theses, and other sources of information that researchers can use can be justified. The data analysis method uses content analysis from its implementation in the form of regional regulations, programs, and other local government activities in implementing legal products regarding early marriage, which have a significant impact on Indonesian people" s structure of life, such as poverty, reduced educational opportunities, reproductive health hazards, risks. The findings from the research reveal that there have been many efforts by local governments in supporting legal reform which are manifested in institutional programs, working groups and community activities as efforts to mitigate and eliminate early marriage in Indonesia. However, these efforts have not been fully successful; it is necessary to enforce the article on the sanctions on the marriage law to strengthen the law.
The Evaluation of Early Marriage Law Renewal in Indonesia Ilahi, Andi Hidayat Anugrah
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i1.43000

Abstract

The study objective is to evaluate early marriage law reform implementation compared to the five regions with the highest Indonesian cases. This research is descriptive using a literature study. The data source consists of primary data consisting of laws. 16 of 2019 and the Decree Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 of the Constitutional Court and secondary legal sources from books, websites, journals, theses, and other sources of information that researchers can use can be justified. The data analysis method uses content analysis from its implementation in the form of regional regulations, programs, and other local government activities in implementing legal products regarding early marriage, which have a significant impact on Indonesian people" s structure of life, such as poverty, reduced educational opportunities, reproductive health hazards, risks. The findings from the research reveal that there have been many efforts by local governments in supporting legal reform which are manifested in institutional programs, working groups and community activities as efforts to mitigate and eliminate early marriage in Indonesia. However, these efforts have not been fully successful; it is necessary to enforce the article on the sanctions on the marriage law to strengthen the law.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 18