cover
Contact Name
Achmad Fawaid
Contact Email
ahmadfawaidfuady@unuja.ac.id
Phone
+6282301906498
Journal Mail Official
jurnalmushaf@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Universitas Nurul Jadid (UNUJA) Karanganyar, Paiton, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur, Indonesia Kode Pos: 67291
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan
ISSN : 27741877     EISSN : 27741885     DOI : http://doi.org/10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1319
The Focus of Mushaf: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan is to provide readers with a better understanding of al-Qur’an dan Tafsir studies. The Scope of Mushaf: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan specializes in the understanding of Indonesian exegesis, methodological examination of Indonesian scholars to the Qur’an and tafsīr, Indonesian scholar manuscript, the living phenomena on Indonesian Islamic tradition, and all related issues to the interdisciplinary studies of the Quran and tafsīr in Indonesia. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Articles 41 Documents
AUTENTIFIKASI DAN INFILTRASI DALAM TAFSIR ISHĀRĪ Rifqatul Husna
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Tafsir and Social Context In Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2089

Abstract

The ishārī interpretation is one of the style or form in the tafsir studies. On the one hand, ishāri was considered to have a positive impact on the interpretation of the al-Qur’an and on the other hand, it was considered a deviant kind of interpretation from al-maqāsid al-shar’iyyah or even contrary to the al-Qur’an and hadīth as the main source in interpreting the al-Qur’an. Therefore, scholars make provisions, criteria, and requirement in interpretation. The mufassir classifies what is considered the main (al-asīl) or basis in an interpretation, and which is considered as abuses (al-dakhīl) in an interpretation. From this academic problem, the discipline of al-asīl wa al-dakhīl fi al-tafsīr was emergent. This research aims to aim to discovere out meeting point the ishāri interpretation, whether it is true or worthy of being considered as al-dakhīl in interpretation or is it necessary to reconstruct the definition, type, or division in the knowledge of al-asīl and al-dakhīl? This study uses the content analysis method so that discussions and conclusions can be traced so that it can produce a neat and orderly conclusion, which in turn results in a conclusion that the ishārī interpretation will be considered and categorized as al-asīl if it meets several conditions: a) the interpretation does not contradict the meaning of z}ahir the end of the verse, b) the interpretation must not contradict reason and sharī'ah, and c) between the interpretation and the interpretation interpreted there is a relationship and correlation.
RELASI JIHĀD DAN SABAR PERSPEKTIF MUḤAMMAD HUSEIN ṬABA’ṬABĀĪ DALAM TAFSIR AL-MIZĀN Abdul Fatah
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 1 (2020): Tafsir, Ideologi, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1333

Abstract

This article figure out the concept of jihād and its correlation with the concept of patience through Muhammad Husein al-ṬabaṬaba’ī perspective. This research set out from a study that often separates the concept of Jihād from the concept of patience, which makes the understanding of jihād used as the basis for violence action in the Qur'an. Meanwhile, some jihād verses are often juxtaposed with patience.  By using the thematic interpretation research method (al-tafsīr al-maudū’ī) and Lucien Goldman's theory of genetic structuralism on the jihād and patient verses in Muhammad Husein al-Tabataba’ī’s Tafsīr, al-Mizān, this study found two conclusions: First, according to ṬabaṬabā’ī, jihād and patience have a strong correlation. Although jihād is a description of one’s faith, the greatest jihad is to be patient with the anger, lust and temptations of satan. A mujāhid is someone who has a patient nature in himself, so even jihād in the form of war must be done with patience. Second, from the analysis of genetic structuralism, the view of ṬabaṬaba’ī was come from an academic situation that emphasizes moderation and logical thinking. Thus, the jihād interpretation in the Tafsīr al-Mizān is peacefull Jihād.
STRENGTHEN THE ROLE OF MUNĀSABAH IN INTERPRETING THE AL-QUR’AN: STUDY OF M. QURAISH SHIHAB PERSPECTIVE ON TAFSIR AL-MISHBAH M. Fatih
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Tafsir and Social Context In Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2061

Abstract

The verses of the Qur’an correspond to each other so that between one part and another explain to one another (al-Qur’ān yufassiru ba’d}uhu ba’d}ā). One of Ulūm al-Qur’ān that examines the reasons and rationality of the sequence and order of parts of the Qur’an is the Munāsabah, that will guide Mufassir in interconnections between parts of the Qur’an. M. Quraish Shihab in his book, Tafsir al-Mishbah, is the only interpretation of the Qur’an 30 juz in Indonesia that consistently applies its approach to the study of the Qur’an in its various forms, as the title of the work implies. This article aims to cover out the role of Munāsabah in Tafsir al-Mishbah. This article is a literal study by making Tafsir al-Mishbah as a major data source. By descriptive and analysis method, finally, this article comes to the conclusion that the role of munāsabah in the al-Misbah has 5 roles; first, prevent the interpreter from misinterpretation; second, removes the obscurity between the multiple choice of meanings and leads to the corresponding meaning; third, presents a product of in-depth and detailed interpretation; fourth, assist the interpreter in uncovering the secret behind the redaction of the verse; fifth, helps the interpreter to conclude Islamic Jurisprudens on the ayat al-ah}kām 
KONTESTASI PENAFSIRAN IDEOLOGIS DI WEBSITE: STUDI ATAS AYAT-AYAT MUTASHĀBIHĀT SIFAT ALLAH DALAM SITUS ISLAM SALAFI DAN NAHDLATUL ULAMA Umarul Faruq
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Tafsir and Social Context In Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2182

Abstract

This article aims to figure out the contesting ideological exegesis of the mutashābihāt verses in the sifāt of Allah from two Islamic sect in Indonesia, Salafi Islam and Nahdlatul Ulama. By using a comparative-qualitative approach to the data on the two streams on the website, this article attempts to describe the interpretations, views, and ideological tendencies of the two schools. Finally, this research concludes that salafi Islam tends to interpret mutashabihat verses zahir without using takwil. Meanwhile, Nahdlatul Ulama carried out takwil on mutashābihāt verses, especially those related to verses that had the connotation of jismiyyah. Although they have differences in interpreting mutashābihāt, they both avoid equating Allah with his being. This article emphasizes that the Salafi Islamic interpretation of the Qur'an and hadith tends to be textual rather than the Nahdlatul Ulama which is more contextual.
PENAFSIRAN ZAITUNAH SUBHAN DAN AMINAH WADUD TENTANG KEBEBASAN PEREMPUAN Diana Khotibi
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 1 (2020): Tafsir, Ideologi, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1345

Abstract

A Discourse on gender is still a controversial issue today. The emergence of various inequalities in society as well as majority injustice occurs in women. The differences in roles between men and women also characterize the culture in society. The role of women is considered limited in the domestic realm, taking care of their children and husbands, while men are not limited. Religion is accused of being one of the causes for the differences between men and women. Therefore this thesis focuses on: (1) How do Amina Wadud and Zaitunah Subhan interpret the verses on women's freedom? (2) What are the similarities and differences in the interpretations of Amina Wadud and Zaitunah Subhan? This study uses a qualitative method with library research techniques or library research, which collects a variety of literature such as books, journals, theses, and theses that are in accordance with the topic of discussion. The results of this study include (1) interpreting the pronunciation of qawwamun in QS. al-Nisā: 34 Amina, interpreting as a leader. By setting two conditions, men have advantages over women. Second, provide for his wife with his own assets. While the meaning of the verse is to imply the functional relationship between men and women. Meanwhile, Zaitunah interprets the pronunciation of qawwāmūn as protector, or person in charge. Regarding nuzhūz, Amina interpreted it as a hormonal disorder, while oliveah interpreted nuzhūz as defiance related to the relationship between humans and their gods. Regarding the progress of women in the public domain, Amina and Zaitunah agree that women should be given the same opportunity to develop themselves. Biological differences according to the two are not reasons in limiting women's movement space. (2) in interpreting the verses Amina and Zaitunah use different methods. Amina Wadud used her hermeneutic method while Zaitunah Subhan used the maud}ū'ī(thematic) method 
CONCEPT OF UMMATAN WASATAN IN THE QUR’AN (COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF TAFSĪR AL-MARĀGHĪ AND TAFSĪR AL-QUR’ĀN BI AL-IMLĀ’ BY KH. ZAINI ABDUL MUN’IM) A. Rafiq Zainul Mun’im; Fadhila Fadhila
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Tafsir and Social Context In Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2164

Abstract

This study discusses the interpretation of KH. Zaini Mun’im and Ah}mad Must}afā al-Marāghī regarding the ummatan wasatan. This research is based on the problem that the interpretation of KH. Zaini Mun’im has the same method and data presentation, and was written at relatively the same time. Besides that, there is an assumption that KH. Zaini Mun’im has a similarity with the tafsīr al-Marāghī. By using the tafsīr muqāran method and tracing the works of both interpretations, Tafsīr bi al-Imlā ‘and Tafsīr al-Marāgī, this article concludes that: first, in terms of data presentation, the interpretation of KH. Zaini Mun’im shares similarities with Tafsir al-Marāghī, and in some cases KH. Zaini Mun’im took al-Maraghi’s opinion. However, the two of them differ in commenting on cases developing in their communities. When interpreting the Koran, KH. Zaini Mun’im always associated with Indonesian traditions and culture, especially the pesantren tradition. Second, when interpreting the wasatan ummatan, both KH. Zaini Mun’im and Ahmad Mustafa al-Marāghi have significant differences. For KH. Zaini, ummatan wasatan is not only a moderate ummah as stated by Ahmad Must}afā al-Marāghī, but these moderate values must be based on al-Qur’an and hadith. This research also confirms that an interpretation, although in some cases taking the opinion of previous scholars, reflects the spirit of the times and traditions.
PANDANGAN AL-ZAMAKHSHARĪ TENTANG NIKAH MUT’AH: ANALISIS IDEOLOGIS DALAM KITAB TAFSIR AL-KASHSHĀF Miftahatul Qalby
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 1 (2020): Tafsir, Ideologi, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1319

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to reveal the tendency of al-Zamakhsharī's interpretation of mut'ah marriage in his book, al-Kashshāf. This study is based on the opinion of M. Quraish Shihab who argues that the al-Zamakhsharī’s interpretation is more inclined to the view of Shiites, that allows Mut'ah marriage. This study uses the thematic research paradigm on QS. Al-Nisā ': 24 and related verses. While the data collected is from primary and secondary literature. With a critical analysis of al-Zamkahsharī's opinion, this study concludes that: The interpretation of al-Zamakhsharī in the tafsir of al-Kashshāf surat al-Nisa 'verse 24 does not discuss about mut'ah marriage, but about the obligation to pay dowry. Meanwhile, the riwāyah that says the verse came down about mut'ah is considered weak, because the narrator not known. Al-Zamakhsharī explained that mut'ah marriage was allowed but the Prophet forbade and forbade mut'ah marriage forever. Of course, his last opinion on the prohibition of mut'ah marriage is a measure that his opinion tends towards Sunnis. From this it becomes clear, that his interpretation of Surat al-Nisa 'verse 24 is in accordance with the opinion of Sunni scholars. 
KECENDERUNGAN IDEOLOGIS TAFSIR KHILĀFAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN; ANALISIS TERHADAP PENAFSIRAN TĀHIR IBNU ‘ASHŪR DAN TAQIY AL-DĪN AL-NABHĀNĪ ahmad nabil
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 1 (2020): Tafsir, Ideologi, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1426

Abstract

This article discusses the insight of the khilāfah in the perspective of Ibn Ashur and Taqī al-Dīn al-Nabhānī. This article departs from the problem that the khilāfah discourse continues to be a polemic among interpreters, especially when the khilāfah is associated with the state. From this problem, this article will discuss the concept of khilāfah in the perspective of T}āhir Ibn Ashur and Taqiy al-Dīn al-Nabhāni. Although al-Nabhānī does not have a complete interpretation work like Ibn Ashur, he does interpret the khilāfah verses contained in his works. Both are sunni figures, although in their attitude towards the problems of the state and khilafah they are different. This article questions how Ibn Ashur and al-Nabhāni view the interpretation of the khilāfah verse? And what are the implications of the two interpretations of the Indonesian context? By using a thematic interpretation approach and discourse analysis of the two interpretive works, this study comes to the conclusion that; (1) khilāfah according to Ibn Ashur is the name of leadership that embodies the leadership of the prophet. while Taqiy al-Dīn al-Nabhānī stated that the khilāfah of the leadership system of Muslims throughout the world is to uphold Islamic law and carry Islamic preaching to all corners of the world. The difference between the two figures in understanding the caliphate is, first, the arguments used by Ibn 'Ashūr emphasize more on aspects that are prerequisites for the Caliph in his khilafah, such as those who believe and do good deeds do justice, while Taqiy al-Dīn al-Nabhānī is more leads to the obligation to obey and practice what Allah commands, and the obligation to establish a caliphate. Second, that both of them have differences in the realm of ideology, of course this will have little or much impact on the frame of mind of the two figures, so what the authors find that distinguishes the two figures is that Ibn 'Ashur is more moderate than Taqiyuddin An-Nabahni.
INDONESIAN MUFASSIR PERSPECTIVE ON GENDER EQUALITY: STUDY ON TAFSIR AL-MISBAH, TAFSIR AL-AZHAR, AND TAFSIR MARĀH LABĪD Ahmad Fawaid; Ach. Zayyadi; Alvina Amatillah; Dwiki Oktafiana Wirendri
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Tafsir and Social Context In Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2169

Abstract

This article aims to figure out Indonesian commentators perspectives on the position of women in the domestic and public sphere. This research comes from the question; Has the patriarchal identity that existed in Indonesia influenced Indonesian commentators perspectives in interpreting the Koran?  And what is Indonesian commentators perspective on women’s leadership in the public sphere? With the literary method and critical analysis of their works, tafsīr al-Misbah, Tafsīr al-Azhar, and Tafsīr Marāh} Labīd, this research resulted in the following findings and conclusions. First, in essence, the three Indonesian commentators did not give permission to women to become leaders in the household, even they have different reasons. Nawāwī al-Bantānī considers men to be leaders for their wives, because men has the potential to educate them, has intellectual and physical strength. Hamka gave consideration to Indonesian traditions and culture. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab argues that a man is the leader over his wife because of the psychological and character considerations of men who are more assertive. Second, regarding women’s leadership in the public sphere, Quraish Shihab and Hamka allow women to become leaders for men as long as they have sufficient criteria. Meanwhile al-Nawāwī did not provide a clear explanation of the status of women’s leadership in the public sphere. The findings in this study also confirm that, in addressing the problem of women, the Indonesian commentators has a paradigm shift from time to time, this is due to sociological factors and conditions surrounding the interpreter.
WACANA MISOGINIS DALAM DISKURSUS TAFSIR AKADEMIS (KAJIAN EPISTEMOLOGIS ATAS JURNAL TAHUN 2010-2019) Sherly Dwi Agustin
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 1, No 1 (2020): Tafsir, Ideologi, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v1i1.1320

Abstract

This study aims to examine misogynic interpretation issues in journals published in 2010-2019. Based on the assumption of journal stagnation in Indonesia on women studies, this study examined 32 journals published that year. Through an epithemological study, using literature review research methods and a philosophical approach, this study tries to examine bibliographically the articles that discuss the interpretation of misogyny verses. This study was conducted to analyze the tendency of writing on misogyny issues in journals. With Ignaz Goldziher's theory of the history of ideas, studies have succeeded in revealing that articles in journals tend to be based on interpretations of the formative era with quasi-critical reasoning dominated by modern feminist ideas from both the theme and methodological aspects. The implication of this study is the formation of a typology of misogynistic studies in journals, which can be used as a reference for the development of further studies, especially the development of the epistemology of al-Qur'an studies