cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya
Contact Email
belardoprasetya@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+628111697376
Journal Mail Official
belardoprasetya@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Jl. Raya Palka KM 3, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Kab. Serang, Provinsi Banten Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law
Published by Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
ISSN : 29618355     EISSN : 29618061     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law (TJIL) is a national peer-reviewed journal particularly in the field of International Law. TJIL aims to publish high quality articles from academics, legal scholars, or practitioners at any level. TJIL creates a forum to exchange new ideas in International Law but not limited to : Public International Law, International Criminal Law, International Environmental law, International Humanitarian law, Human Right, International Law of the Sea, International Dispute Settlement, International Organizations Law, International Private Law. We invite experts, academics, practitioners, NGO activists, master and doctoral students, also legal observers to send their articles.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023" : 8 Documents clear
IMPLEMENTASI TERHADAP MINAMATA CONVENTION ON MERCURY DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Mengenai Pencemaran Merkuri Dan Arsen Di Teluk Buyat) Ahmad Rayhan; Widya Ayu Pramesty
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19111

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The increasingly advanced industrial sector in Indonesia makes several things including the environment negatively affected. The destruction of nature by human activities is caused by over-exploration and exploitation activities. The negative impact that is usually caused by the mining sector for the surrounding environment is the occurrence of water pollution by heavy metals, especially Mercury. In this case, there is an International convention that regulates Mercury, namely the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Pollution of Buyat Bay by Mercury and Arsenic is caused by mining activities from PT. Newmont Minahasa Raya which started in 1996 using normative method research methods. This normative or literature research examines the study of relevant documents in writing this scientific paper to find out the 2013 Minamata Convention agreement and its implementation in the case of mercury and arsenic pollution in Buyat Bay. The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) conducted a study in 2001 on mercury and mercury compounds related to aspects of mercury health impacts, sources, transportation, circulation and trade, and mercury prevention and control technologies. UNEP concluded that an international effort is needed to reduce the risk of mercury impacts on human health and environmental safety. The Minamata Convention was signed by 92 countries of the world at a diplomatic conference in Minamata, Kumamoto Province, Japan on October 10, 2013. In the case of Buyat Bay pollution, the government concluded that, the gold mining company PT Newmont Minahasa Raya had polluted the environment in Buyat Bay, Minahasa, North Sulawesi. As a form of implementation because Indonesia ratified the Minamata Convention, Indonesia established a special Technical Team in mercury management. This technical team was created to compile and publish a National Action Plan (RAN) based on the annex to the Minamata Convention, namely the elimination of the use of mercury in gold processing.  Keywords : Minamata Convention, Mercury, Buyat Bay, Environmental Pollution. ABSTRAK:Semakin majunya sektor Industri di Indonesia membuat beberapa hal termasuk lingkungan terkena dampak negatifnya. Kerusakan alam oleh aktivitas manusia disebabkan oleh kegiatan eksplorasi dan eksploitasi yang berlebihan. Dampak negatif yang biasanya ditimbulkan dari sektor pertambangan bagi lingkungan sekitar adalah terjadinya pencemaran air oleh logam berat Terutama Merkuri. Dalam hal ini terdapat konvensi Internasional yang mengatur mengenai Merkuri yakni Minamata Convention on Mercury. Pencemaran Teluk Buyat oleh Merkuri dan Arsen disebabkan karena aktivitas pertambangan dari PT. Newmont Minahasa Raya yang dimulai sejak tahun 1996 dengan menggunakan metode penelitian metode normatif. Penelitian normatif atau kepustakaan ini mengkaji studi dokumen yang relevan dalam penulisan karya ilmiah ini untuk mengetahui perjanjian Minamata Convention 2013 dan implementasinya dalam kasus pencemaran Merkuri dan Arsen di Teluk Buyat. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) melakukan sebuah kajian pada tahun 2001 mengenai Merkuri dan senyawa Merkuri terkait dengan aspek dampak kesehatan, sumber, transportasi, peredaran dan perdagangan merkuri, serta teknologi pencegahan dan pengendalian merkuri. UNEP berdasarkan kajian tersebut menyimpulkan bahwasanya diperlukan suatu upaya internasional untuk menurunkan resiko dari dampak yang ditimbulkan merkuri bagi kesehatan manusia dan keselamatan lingkungan hidup. Konvensi Minamata ini ditandatangani oleh 92 negara dunia pada diplomatic conference di Minamata, Provinsi Kumamoto, Jepang pada 10 Oktober 2013. Dalam kasus pencemaran Teluk Buyat Pemerintah menyimpulkan bahwa, perusahaan tambang emas PT Newmont Minahasa Raya telah mencemari lingkungan di Teluk Buyat, Minahasa, Sulawesi Utara. Sebagai bentuk pelaksanaan karena Indonesia meratifikasi Konvensi Minamata, Indonesia membentuk Tim Teknis khusus dalam pengelolaan Merkuri. Tim teknis ini dibuat untuk menyusun serta menerbitkan Rencana Aksi Nasional (RAN) yang berdasarkan lampiran dalam Konvensi Minamata yakni penghapusan penggunaan Merkuri pada pengolahan emas. Kata Kunci : Konvensi Minamata, Merkuri, Teluk Buyat, Pencemaran Lingkungan.
COMPARISON OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS IN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA Adelia Oktaviani; Satrio Fajar Romadhon; Muhammad Rusli Arafat
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774

Abstract

Juvenile growth is a period when children have a high level of curiosity which sometimes leads them to commit crimes that can cause a high number of juvenile crimes. Juvenile criminal cases in Indonesia in 2020 reached 6,146 cases obtained from the 2020 Supreme Court Annual Report and in South Korea reached 38,590 cases obtained from the South Korean Judicial Yearbook 2020. There is a juvenile justice system to resolve juvenile criminal cases. This judicial system aims to educate and protect the rights of Children in Conflict with the Law (ABH) for their future. The juvenile justice system is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA) and the Juvenile Act in South Korea. A comparison of the juvenile justice system in the two countries in fostering and protecting juveniles is an interesting matter to discuss by paying attention to the statistics on juvenile crime, the juvenile justice system, types of punishment, and the laws that force in both countries. With normative legal research methods, conclusions are drawn regarding the significant differences in the judicial systems of the two countries.
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION IN THE ERA OF GLOBALIZATION (INDONESIA PERSPECTIVE) Yogi Muhammad Rahman; Aflah Haora; Elsa Nurfitriani Sutansi
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19603

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This journal explores the topic of securing personal data in the era of globalization, focusing on the legal framework of International Law and existing laws and regulations in Indonesia, especially the provisions stipulated in Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Data Protection. The main objective of this study is to provide readers with knowledge regarding the personal data protection regulatory landscape at both national and international levels. This research uses juridical-normative and juridical-empirical methodologies to collect, compile, and research research data. This approach includes the study of legal theories and concepts related to the legal principles of laws and regulations, especially those contained in Law Number 27 of 2022, through journal references or legal materials through electronic media. The goal is to gain theoretical insights that can serve as a foundation for research. Furthermore, this research gave birth to a discourse on individual information governance within the framework of global jurisprudence and regulatory framework in Indonesia, especially Law Number 27 of 2022, along with the consequences caused after its implementation.Keywords; Personal Data, Data Protection, the Era of Globalization
Front Matter Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023 tirtayasa tjil
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.20844

Abstract

TINDAKAN AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM MEMERANGI TERORISME DI AFGHANISTAN DAN HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN PRINSIP NON INTERVENSI Beni Prawira Candra Jaya
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19438

Abstract

                                                        ABSTRACT:Terrorism is a threat for any country and an international crime that must be fought by every country, but a country is not allowed to fight terrorism in the territory of another country, because it is contrary to the principle of non-intervention, which stresses the principle of the sovereign equality of every country. But in fact, the United States has committed military attacks against Afghanistan which resulted in many civilian casualties, Afghans people died, and they didn’t include the thousands of people who had to flee to the surrounding countries. This research aimed to examine and analyze the principle of non-intervention on the regulations according to the international law and its relations with action of the United States to combat the terrorism in Afghanistan. The Research in this thesis conducted in normative legal research. The results showed that the regulation on non-intervention principle governed by international law was regulation in general legal principles, the UN Charter, and UN General Assembly Resolution No. 2131 and 2625. It was also known that the US intervention into Afghanistan are carried out by humanitarian reasons, self defence and to catch and prosecute the perpetrators of terrorism is an act that violates the principle of non-intervention in international law. It happened because there is no evidence of crimes against humanity in Afghanistan. United States also intervened without permission from the government of Afghanistan and didn’t coordinate with the UN Security Council. In fact, because of such action would lead to the view that the purpose of the United States was not only to fight against the perpetrators of terrorism, but also to change the form of government of Afghanistan.Keywords: Non-Intervention, International Crime, TerrorismABSTRAK:Terorisme merupakan ancaman terhadap negara dan kejahatan internasional yang wajib di perangi oleh setiap negara, akan tetapi suatu negara tidak diperkenankan untuk memerangi terorisme di wilayah negara lain, karena bertentangan dengan prinsip non intervensi yang sangat menekankan asas kesetaraan kedaulatan bagi setiap negara. Namun pada kenyataannya, Amerika Serikat telah melakukan tindakan serangan militer terhadap Afghanistan yang mengakibatkan banyaknya korban sipil, dan belum termasuk ribuan penduduk yang harus mengungsi ke negara sekitar. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis pengaturan prinsip non intervensi menurut hukum internasional dan kaitannya dengan tindakan Amerika Serikat dalam memerangi terorisme di Afghanistan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka dan dokumen terhadap bahan hukum primer maupun sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip non intervensi diatur dalam prinsip hukum umum, Piagam PBB, serta Resolusi Majelis Umum PBB Nomor 2131 dan 2625. Diketahui bahwa tindakan Amerika Serikat terhadap Afghanistan yang dilakukan dengan alasan kemanusiaan, pembelaan diri dan menangkap serta mengadili para pelaku terorisme adalah pelanggaran terhadap prinsip non intervensi dalam hukum internasional, Hal ini karena tidak ditemukan bukti terjadinya kejahatan kemanusiaan di Afghanistan. Amerika juga melakukan intervensi tanpa izin dari pemerintah Afghanistan dan tidak berkoordinasi terlebih dahulu dengan Dewan Keamanan PBB. Bahkan, akibat dari tindakan tersebut justru menimbulkan pandangan bahwa tujuan Amerika Serikat yang sebenarnya tidak hanya memerangi para pelaku terorisme, tetapi juga mengubah bentuk pemerintahan Afghanistan.Kata Kunci: Non-Intervensi, Kejahatan Internasional, Terorisme
Back Matter Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023 tirtayasa tjil
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.20845

Abstract

THE DOUBLE STANDARDS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE AND PALESTINE Khoitil Aswadi
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19694

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This study investigates the effect of double standards in international law on conflict resolution in Ukraine and Palestine. Through a comparison of conflicts in the two countries, this study finds that double standards in international law affect conflict resolution in Ukraine and Palestine differently. There is evidence of a double standard in international law related to the different interests of the major powers in the conflict in the two countries. The impact of this double standard affects the effectiveness of efforts to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and Palestine, with conflict resolution in Ukraine being achieved more quickly than in Palestine. Therefore, this research suggests the need for consistency and equality in the application of international law in dealing with conflicts, and seeking peace negotiations involving all parties involved in the conflict in order to achieve a sustainable resolution.Keywords: Double Standards, Conflict Resolution, Parties Involved.
Full Issue Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023 tirtayasa tjil
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v2i1.20846

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 2, No 1 (2023): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2023 Vol 1, No 2 (2022): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 Edisi Desember 2022 Vol 1, No 1 (2022): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 Edisi Juni 2022